(December 25, 2017 at 9:48 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: No, he's really mean to me personally. I've seen him be cool with most other people here, but ever since I first joined he's just been really nasty to me right off the bat for some reason. Besides the obnoxiously dishonest strawmen arguments, hes thrown out some really personal insults my way on a number of occasions. Why in the world would I like someone who talks to me like that?? Lol. It takes quite a bit for me not to like you.

I like him, but I understand. My two favorite monkeys have been much the same. Humorless and obnoxious. Khem’s one of my old “buddies” here, though. We can argue all day and still be cool. I like that he’s not a pussy. You’re cool too. Merry Christmas, ya weird theist.

(December 25, 2017 at 10:04 am)Shell B Wrote:

(December 25, 2017 at 9:48 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: No, he's really mean to me personally. I've seen him be cool with most other people here, but ever since I first joined he's just been really nasty to me right off the bat for some reason. Besides the obnoxiously dishonest strawmen arguments, hes thrown out some really personal insults my way on a number of occasions. Why in the world would I like someone who talks to me like that?? Lol. It takes quite a bit for me not to like you.

I like him, but I understand. My two favorite monkeys have been much the same. Humorless and obnoxious. Khem’s one of my old “buddies” here, though. We can argue all day and still be cool. I like that he’s not a pussy. You’re cool too. Merry Christmas, ya weird theist.

Merry Christmas! ❤😁

(December 25, 2017 at 9:56 am)SaStrike Wrote: People are forgetting it's not about gender, everyone has had experiences in life where they got interrupted while speaking, or have gotten paid more or less than they deserve. Or gotten chosen for a job at someone else's expense. There is no perfect equality. But it surely isn't about gender or race anymore. It's going too far.

I mean sure a list of pros and cons can be listed for both genders and the lists will even differ from people with different backgrounds and upbringing so I don't see the point in trying to embarrass yourself in public as a feminist or mra or whatever new shit people come up with soon.

---

(December 25, 2017 at 9:48 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: No, he's really mean to me personally. I've seen him be cool with most other people here, but ever since I first joined he's just been really nasty to me right off the bat for some reason. Besides the obnoxiously dishonest strawmen arguments, hes thrown out some really personal insults my way on a number of occasions. Why in the world would I like someone who talks to me like that?? Lol. It takes quite a bit for me not to like you.

It's because you were born the inferior gender...

Nope, sorry, studies continue to show gender discrimination against women still a thing. Look up gendered name work application letter studies for example.

(December 25, 2017 at 9:48 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: No, he's really mean to me personally. I've seen him be cool with most other people here, but ever since I first joined he's just been really nasty to me right off the bat for some reason. Besides the obnoxiously dishonest strawmen arguments, hes thrown out some really personal insults my way on a number of occasions. Why in the world would I like someone who talks to me like that?? Lol. It takes quite a bit for me not to like you.

And the saddest part about this is you not getting any Khem in your forum diet, and I definitely enjoy his posts.  Of course few can stick it to you as well as he can and I agree he seems to have something going with you.  You know his wife is a believer, right?  Maybe he is telling you all the things he can't/won't say to her?  That would kind of make you his forum wife.   

But you also have quite a following.  We all just hate to see two of our faves fight.  Like kids in a bad marriage, we're really the victims here.  

(December 25, 2017 at 10:06 am)Grandizer Wrote: Nope, sorry, studies continue to show gender discrimination against women still a thing. Look up gendered name work application letter studies for example.

Apology accepted, and I disagree because it depends on what is being applied for. For a nightclub bouncer for example, would you hire a male or female? In this example I would hire shell B over thumpalumpacus, that doesnt mean im discriminating against the males, it's just she is more suited for the job.

(December 25, 2017 at 10:55 am)SaStrike Wrote:

(December 25, 2017 at 10:06 am)Grandizer Wrote: Nope, sorry, studies continue to show gender discrimination against women still a thing. Look up gendered name work application letter studies for example.

Apology accepted, and I disagree because it depends on what is being applied for. For a nightclub bouncer for example, would you hire a male or female? In this example I would hire shell B over thumpalumpacus, that doesnt mean im discriminating against the males, it's just she is more suited for the job.

Study results trump your individual opinion that may or may not be partly dishonest. Regardless, your example involves one man vs. one woman. Hardly a conclusive example that proves your point.

Furthermore, bouncer is not a high status job anyway, so prob not a loss for either Shell or Thump.

(December 25, 2017 at 9:48 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: No, he's really mean to me personally. I've seen him be cool with most other people here, but ever since I first joined he's just been really nasty to me right off the bat for some reason. Besides the obnoxiously dishonest strawmen arguments, hes thrown out some really personal insults my way on a number of occasions. Why in the world would I like someone who talks to me like that?? Lol. It takes quite a bit for me not to like you.

Grow a pair CL




😋

(December 24, 2017 at 10:34 pm)Thena323 Wrote: But make no mistake: The MRM is all but dominated by wretchedly misogynistic "New Atheists" who have taken to Alt Right ideology like flies to shit.
Their motives and goals are not what they purport to be.

People like this obnoxious motherfucker right?





I can't stand this guy. But I actually think Thunderf00t is even worse:





The first guy is a fucking obnoxious asshole but at least he trys to at least fake humility for comic effect and make fun of himself a little (talking about his small penis, etc). Ahlthough I still can't stand the guy.

This second guy... Thunderf00t..... I've never sensed so much smugness purely in the tone of someone's voice. What a fucking butthole.

Worse than that, he has actually gone out of his way to invade people's privacy and shit. And he thinks that because he's studied chemistry then anyone who disagrees with him is less scientific.

He also thinks that not only did Hitler being in power advance science but he thinks the advances of science made when Hitler was in power probablly outweighs the immorality of the holocaust!

And he acts like because men on average are taller then all taller. And he acts like science supports men being smarter on average, and not only that but he acts like ALL men are smarter and they're the superior sex.

I don't normally cringe even at the most cringeworthy things. But Thunderf00t makes me cringe. I've never disliked an atheist YouTuber as much as I dislike thunderf00t.

(December 25, 2017 at 11:02 am)Grandizer Wrote:

(December 25, 2017 at 10:55 am)SaStrike Wrote: Apology accepted, and I disagree because it depends on what is being applied for. For a nightclub bouncer for example, would you hire a male or female? In this example I would hire shell B over thumpalumpacus, that doesnt mean im discriminating against the males, it's just she is more suited for the job.

Study results trump your individual opinion that may or may not be partly dishonest. Regardless, your example involves one man vs. one woman. Hardly a conclusive example that proves your point.

Furthermore, bouncer is not a high status job anyway, so prob not a loss for either Shell or Thump.

You're just nitpicking in order to skew the stats into favouring the point you are trying to force. A job is a job, it was only an example anyway. Why not mention the many ads that require PA's or secretary which state female only? Had it said male only  I'm sure somehow those would be included in your range of things to point out. But all of a sudden it's "prob not a loss" (just one example of the excuses and selective logic made by both feminists and mra).

Amazing atheist is so obnoxious, I have to say I hate him more than Thunderf00t.