(February 9, 2018 at 6:49 pm)Banned Wrote: A lot of people use these illusions as examples that gravity has no anomolies, but they are wrong, although the differences in gravitational pull, and also its directions are  minimal, so we accept the popular idea that gravity is seamless and consistent.

A troll with a penchant for whimsy? Well fuck my old boots, now I've seen everything. But do go on.

Quote:A lot of people use these illusions as examples that gravity has no anomolies, but they are wrong, although the differences in gravitational pull, and also its directions are  minimal, so we accept the popular idea that gravity is seamless and consistent.

Says the moron who knows dick about Physics . But just loves to play expert .

I bet I can guess your next card - gravity's fake, yes? All part of the conspiraceh?

That flat Earth guy looks a lot like Jim Dale's Columbus from the Carry On film of the same name (and supposedly time period):

(February 9, 2018 at 8:48 pm)Succubus Wrote:

(February 9, 2018 at 6:49 pm)Banned Wrote: A lot of people use these illusions as examples that gravity has no anomolies, but they are wrong, although the differences in gravitational pull, and also its directions are  minimal, so we accept the popular idea that gravity is seamless and consistent.

A troll with a penchant for whimsy? Well fuck my old boots, now I've seen everything. But do go on.

I forgot to mention that gravity also fluctuates, but so does everything else by the same causes, so once again the differences are minimal...

The information isn't hidden, and has been known about since the late 1990's. And several magazines have published articles from time to time.
Here is a sample of the one of the latest...

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2...s-serious/ - fluctuations.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2...-extremes/
- variations by location.

---

(February 9, 2018 at 8:55 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:

Quote:A lot of people use these illusions as examples that gravity has no anomolies, but they are wrong, although the differences in gravitational pull, and also its directions are  minimal, so we accept the popular idea that gravity is seamless and consistent.

Says the moron who knows dick about Physics . But just loves to play expert .

"Physics" is not a proper noun, unless it is the name of a department etc.
And it is right to use a capital letter at the beginning of a sentence.
By sentence, I don't mean jail sentence, which you would be familiar with, but sentence as in a subject and predicate.

Quote:"Physics" is not a proper noun, unless it is the name of a department etc. 
And it is right to use a capital letter at the beginning of a sentence.
By sentence, I don't mean jail sentence, which you would be familiar with, but sentence as in a subject and predicate.

1. You don't wanna start a spelling or grammar feud . Because you have made plenty of errors on this site i could nitpick .

2. English is not my native language .

3. I don't care .So take your English lecture and cram it up your ass.

(February 10, 2018 at 12:16 am)Tizheruk Wrote: 1. You don't wanna start a spelling or grammar feud . Because you have made plenty of errors on this site i could nitpick .

2. English is not my native language .

3. I don't care .So take your English lecture and cram it up your ass.

The point I was making wasn't about English grammar, but how would you be able to correctly assess comments on a physical phenomenon, if you can't handle the conveying language?

Do you understand why you needed to make a derogatory remark to me?

Why did you feel intimidated in the first place?

(February 10, 2018 at 5:01 am)Banned Wrote:

(February 10, 2018 at 12:16 am)Tizheruk Wrote: 1. You don't  wanna start a spelling or grammar feud . Because you have made plenty of errors  on this site i could nitpick .

2. English is not my native language .

3. I don't care .So  take your English lecture and cram it up your ass.

The point I was making wasn't about English grammar, but how would you be able to correctly assess comments on a physical phenomenon, if you can't handle the conveying language?

Do you understand why you needed to make a derogatory remark to me?

Why did you feel intimidated in the first place?

1. You confuse not being able to  understand or read comments in english. To not  being perfect in writing in it. 

2. Yes i understand perfectly well why . Your disingenuous prick who's earned it .  

3. Nothing your feeble brain could come up with could  intimidate me . So shove your pretentious psychoanalysis of me in same place as the english lecture .