Jesus Christ, this thread needs splitting, buttholes.

You're right. This thread has turned into a Huggyfest and it should be split into one butthole each.

(March 1, 2018 at 12:01 pm)Shell B Wrote: Jesus Christ, this thread needs splitting, buttholes.

It has been requested. Awaiting for mod action.

(March 1, 2018 at 11:19 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Explain how it's sexist if man was BOTH female and male combined?

Well, you said man. But it turns out you actually meant hermaphrodite.

Androgynous is not the same as male. And male + female is not male.

Why can't you even grasp basic concepts?

---

(March 1, 2018 at 11:19 am)Huggy74 Wrote: The female portion was taken out of man and made in to woman, or do you not remember that part?

I remember the part where I posted that that's one of two contradictory creation stories.

(March 1, 2018 at 11:45 am)pocaracas Wrote:

(March 1, 2018 at 11:19 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I couldn't tell you the chronological order off the top of my head, I just happen to know that Job is the oldest book, so stating it's a post-rationalization its simply not true.

That makes sense...
But I took a look at the wiki and here's what came out.

"Rabbinic tradition ascribes the authorship of Job to Moses, but scholars generally agree that it was written between the 7th and 4th centuries BCE, with the 6th century BCE as the most likely period for various reasons."

"Tradition credits Moses as the author of Genesis, as well as Exodus, Book of Leviticus, Numbers and most of Book of Deuteronomy, but modern scholars increasingly see them as a product of the 6th and 5th centuries BC."

The two books could have been contemporary, if the tradition is right, and Job could be post-Genesis, if one looks at the later dates posited for their writing.

(March 1, 2018 at 11:19 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I don't see how if man had godlike power.

Well, you said that "man was never intended to reproduce sexually", and yet Genesis 1§28 states "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth". How how this second bit happen without sexual reproduction?

*emphasis mine*

That's where the 'godlike' power comes into play, man had creative power.

Jesus is God, yet Jesus is also referred to as the second Adam. Jesus is the example of what man was supposed to be in the beginning.

Did not Jesus feed 5000 people with 5 loaves of bread and two fish? How were bread and fish able to multiply?

(March 1, 2018 at 12:14 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Did not Jesus feed 5000 people with 5 loaves of bread and two fish? How were bread and fish able to multiply?

Because magic. LMAO.

(March 1, 2018 at 12:19 pm)Hammy Wrote:

(March 1, 2018 at 12:14 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Did not Jesus feed 5000 people with 5 loaves of bread and two fish? How were bread and fish able to multiply?

Because magic. LMAO.

Like DUH

(March 1, 2018 at 12:14 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 1, 2018 at 11:45 am)pocaracas Wrote: That makes sense...
But I took a look at the wiki and here's what came out.

"Rabbinic tradition ascribes the authorship of Job to Moses, but scholars generally agree that it was written between the 7th and 4th centuries BCE, with the 6th century BCE as the most likely period for various reasons."

"Tradition credits Moses as the author of Genesis, as well as Exodus, Book of Leviticus, Numbers and most of Book of Deuteronomy, but modern scholars increasingly see them as a product of the 6th and 5th centuries BC."

The two books could have been contemporary, if the tradition is right, and Job could be post-Genesis, if one looks at the later dates posited for their writing.



Well, you said that "man was never intended to reproduce sexually", and yet Genesis 1§28 states "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth". How how this second bit happen without sexual reproduction?

*emphasis mine*

That's where the 'godlike' power comes into play, man had creative power.

Jesus is God, yet Jesus is also referred to as the second Adam. Jesus is the example of what man was supposed to be in the beginning.

Did not Jesus feed 5000 people with 5 loaves of bread and two fish? How were bread and fish able to multiply?

Are you saying that the passage in Genesis "be fruitful and increase in number" really means increase the number of animals and plants?

I read it as they themselves were to be fruitful, they themselves were to bear fruits, aka reproduce. Am I wrong?

(March 1, 2018 at 12:23 pm)pocaracas Wrote:

(March 1, 2018 at 12:14 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*

That's where the 'godlike' power comes into play, man had creative power.

Jesus is God, yet Jesus is also referred to as the second Adam. Jesus is the example of what man was supposed to be in the beginning.

Did not Jesus feed 5000 people with 5 loaves of bread and two fish? How were bread and fish able to multiply?

Are you saying that the passage in Genesis "be fruitful and increase in number" really means increase the number of animals and plants?

I read it as they themselves were to be fruitful, they themselves were to bear fruits, aka reproduce. Am I wrong?

Huggy often has "interesting " ways of reading things .

(March 1, 2018 at 12:19 pm)Hammy Wrote:

(March 1, 2018 at 12:14 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Did not Jesus feed 5000 people with 5 loaves of bread and two fish? How were bread and fish able to multiply?

Because magic. LMAO.

That's what my parties are like.
Very tiny sandwiches.