Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 1:05 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:04 am)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 10:55 am)Mathilda Wrote: Who said anything about increasing in intelligence?
You did...
(March 9, 2018 at 10:36 am)Mathilda Wrote: Photons do not change. Intelligence require change over time.

Maybe you should learn to read. Admittedly my post did have a typo and I meant to say requires. Still, the meaning is the same.

Intelligence requires change over time. This is not the same as saying intelligence increases over time.

You really have reached full-on nutter mode now though with your references to the bible. I'm taking this as a sign that you've lost the argument and can only respond with noise.
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:04 am)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 11:00 am)Grandizer Wrote: We're talking about 1 John here. Why did you jump to other books in order to interpret the verse? And the books you quote here are still full of metaphors and symbolism, lol.

Because you interpret scripture with scripture, that's why.

So I take it you are a literal light of the world? Is Jesus a literal word of God? Is he literal bread as well?

Quote:It doesn't get any more clearer than THE CITY HAD NO NEED OF THE SUN... FOR THE GLORY OF GOD DID LIGHTEN IT.

Nothing to do with physical light. On the contrary, the verses are clear that God's light is separate from the physical light.
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:12 am)Mathilda Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 11:04 am)Huggy74 Wrote: You did...

Maybe you should learn to read. Admittedly my post did have a typo and I meant to say requires. Still, the meaning is the same.

Intelligence requires change over time. This is not the same as saying intelligence increases over time.

You really have reached full-on nutter mode now though  with your references to the bible. I'm taking this as a sign that you've lost the argument and can only respond with noise.

Ok, so what did you mean by stating "Intelligence requires change over time".

For me to lose the argument, you'd have to present evidence of Odin that at least meets or exceeds the "low" standard of evidence I presented, can you?
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:31 am)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 11:12 am)Mathilda Wrote: Maybe you should learn to read. Admittedly my post did have a typo and I meant to say requires. Still, the meaning is the same.

Intelligence requires change over time. This is not the same as saying intelligence increases over time.

You really have reached full-on nutter mode now though  with your references to the bible. I'm taking this as a sign that you've lost the argument and can only respond with noise.

Ok, so what did you mean by stating "Intelligence requires change over time".

For me to lose the argument, you'd have to present evidence of Odin that at least meets or exceeds the "low" standard of evidence I presented, can you?

That's the problem, Huggy. You have a very low standard of evidence.
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:43 am)Grandizer Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 11:31 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ok, so what did you mean by stating "Intelligence requires change over time".

For me to lose the argument, you'd have to present evidence of Odin that at least meets or exceeds the "low" standard of evidence I presented, can you?

That's the problem, Huggy. You have a very low standard of evidence.

Ok granted, but you match my low standard in providing evidence for Odin?
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:47 am)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 11:43 am)Grandizer Wrote: That's the problem, Huggy. You have a very low standard of evidence.

Ok granted, but you match my low standard in providing evidence for Odin?

As a joke, or for reals?

You seem confused.
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:51 am)Grandizer Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 11:47 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ok granted, but you match my low standard in providing evidence for Odin?

As a joke, or for reals?

You seem confused.

For real...

I've stated I'd provide evidence for God and challenged anyone to provide evidence against and we'd who had the most evidence for or against. You guys are on record saying my evidence is "low" in standard which I'm granting, either way low does not equate to zero, So I still have a leg up on Odin for which absolutely ZERO evidence that meets my "low" standard has been submitted.
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 11:04 am)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 10:55 am)Mathilda Wrote: So if your god is made from light, how can it interact with the world without us seeing it?

How can something made from light be intelligent?

How can a structure of light (or even any other form of energy) persist without the use of matter?

That's the supernatural part...

LOL. That’s right; don’t think about it too hard, Huggy.  You might be forced to realize what a crock of shit it all is.  

(March 9, 2018 at 10:54 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: And, there it is.  When we don’t have an explanation for the supernatural claims made in the Bible, just reference the Bible!  Huggy, you are truely a one-trick-pony.

The sad irony here is that Huggy is incapable of realizing that this failed logic, and ridiculously low standard for “evidence” are exactly what we have been proposing in favor of Odin; a claim that he has essentially dismissed as ridiculous and improbable due to lack of evidence.

Quote:However low you believe my standard of evidence to be, none of you has even come close to presenting anything remotely close for Odin, if so, link it.

Stories of Odin exist.  I have a personal relationship with Odin.  Therefore he exists.  Exactly the same evidence and argument that Christians use for Yahweh.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
Huggy thinks his god is special.  Short bus special.
Reply
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
(March 9, 2018 at 12:08 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 9, 2018 at 11:51 am)Grandizer Wrote: As a joke, or for reals?

You seem confused.

For real...

I've stated I'd provide evidence for God and challenged anyone to provide evidence against and we'd who had the most evidence for or against. You guys are on record saying my evidence is "low" in standard which I'm granting, either way low does not equate to zero, So I still have a leg up on Odin for which absolutely ZERO evidence that meets my "low" standard has been submitted.

I proved handily FSM exists and is the one true god, It's up to you to accept that fact.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

      Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg]
                                                                                         
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  It's Darwin Day tomorrow - logic and reason demands merriment! Duty 7 971 February 13, 2022 at 10:21 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
Photo The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it Ghetto Sheldon 86 8489 October 5, 2021 at 8:41 pm
Last Post: Rahn127
  Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God Mechaghostman2 158 36248 July 14, 2021 at 3:52 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  First order logic, set theory and God dr0n3 293 36642 December 11, 2018 at 11:35 am
Last Post: T0 Th3 M4X
  Disproving the christian (and muslim) god I_am_not_mafia 106 31072 March 15, 2018 at 6:57 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  a challenge All atheists There is inevitably a Creator. Logic says that suni_muslim 65 17171 November 28, 2017 at 5:02 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  What is logic? Little Rik 278 66055 May 1, 2017 at 5:40 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  What is your Opinion on Having Required Classes in Logic in Schools? Salacious B. Crumb 43 10320 August 4, 2015 at 12:01 am
Last Post: BitchinHitchins
  Arguing w/ Religious Friends z7z 14 4008 June 5, 2015 at 4:53 pm
Last Post: Cephus
  Logic vs Evidence dimaniac 34 14093 November 25, 2014 at 10:41 pm
Last Post: bennyboy



Users browsing this thread: 29 Guest(s)