(March 10, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Banned Wrote: Resorting to personal attacks is usually a sign of not having any more imput on the subject.

When you're among the first to draw that particular blood, crying about others seems a bit... weak.

(March 10, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Banned Wrote: Asking people to go to a library is hardly a conversation.

You weren't asked to visit a library you smarmy, self satisfied ass-crack. You were given multiple links to exactly what you fucking asked for. In typical troll form, you simply ignored them and demanded we give you more since none had been presented.

(March 10, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Banned Wrote:

(March 10, 2018 at 9:30 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: He's not lying, he's trolling. Hence, my report.

When you are feeling powerless, that's probably all you can do.

Trolling is against the rules. You broke that rule. Maybe you should have read them before you went full troll, POE.

(March 11, 2018 at 12:36 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:

(March 10, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Banned Wrote: Resorting to personal attacks is usually a sign of not having any more imput on the subject.

When you're among the first to draw that particular blood, crying about others seems a bit... weak.

(March 10, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Banned Wrote: Asking people to go to a library is hardly a conversation.

You weren't asked to visit a library you smarmy, self satisfied ass-crack. You were given multiple links to exactly what you fucking asked for. In typical troll form, you simply ignored them and demanded we give you more since none had been presented.

(March 10, 2018 at 10:58 pm)Banned Wrote: When you are feeling powerless, that's probably all you can do.

Trolling is against the rules. You broke that rule. Maybe you should have read them before you went full troll, POE.

Yeah, I'm very close to removing his posting privileges which may have him living up to his name sooner rather than later.

Interesting how he completely ignored my link.

(March 11, 2018 at 12:47 am)Lutrinae Wrote: Interesting how he completely ignored my link.

And the three I gave him.

Yet he still felt justified in demanding we give him what he was asking for. I guess dishing up dinner and handing it to him, along with silverware and a napkin, wasn't enough. He apparently wants to be spoon fed, bite by bite, as well.

---

(March 11, 2018 at 12:46 am)The Valkyrie Wrote:

(March 11, 2018 at 12:36 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: When you're among the first to draw that particular blood, crying about others seems a bit... weak.

You weren't asked to visit a library you smarmy, self satisfied ass-crack. You were given multiple links to exactly what you fucking asked for. In typical troll form, you simply ignored them and demanded we give you more since none had been presented.

Trolling is against the rules. You broke that rule. Maybe you should have read them before you went full troll, POE.

Yeah, I'm very close to removing his posting privileges which may have him living up to his name sooner rather than later.

You mean the one he accused the staff of giving him?

(March 11, 2018 at 1:03 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:

(March 11, 2018 at 12:47 am)Lutrinae Wrote: Interesting how he completely ignored my link.

And the three I gave him.

Yet he still felt justified in demanding we give him what he was asking for. I guess dishing up dinner and handing it to him, along with silverware and a napkin, wasn't enough. He apparently wants to be spoon fed, bite by bite, as well.

---

(March 11, 2018 at 12:46 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: Yeah, I'm very close to removing his posting privileges which may have him living up to his name sooner rather than later.

You mean the one he accused the staff of giving him?

Wow he actually said that 

(March 11, 2018 at 1:36 am)Tizheruk Wrote:

(March 11, 2018 at 1:03 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: And the three I gave him.

Yet he still felt justified in demanding we give him what he was asking for. I guess dishing up dinner and handing it to him, along with silverware and a napkin, wasn't enough. He apparently wants to be spoon fed, bite by bite, as well.

---

You mean the one he accused the staff of giving him?

Wow he actually said that 

Yes.

Another professional victim.

(March 10, 2018 at 11:44 am)chimp3 Wrote:

(March 10, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote:

---

Ok, then.

Are you ready to show me that she never did something wrong with solid evidence?

Put up or shut up son.  

At least once a year I like to remind our fellow forum lurkers the hidden sickness of your twisted thoughts. I can not conceive of any humanist ever finding a reason that rape would be acceptable. You seem to revel in it. I hope you do not have children. If you do or have, please keep this sick idea away from them. If they suffer from sexual abuse they would only feel guilt and shame for bringing rape upon themselves.

Idiot.  

1) When I ever said that rape is acceptable?  
I am only saying that humans are not able to change the natural laws.
Can you cancel or undo a reaction after an action take place?

These laws are not set by LR you fool.  
All humans can do is to limit or avoid the damage if that is possible and of course I will be the first to help if I can.

2) As usual you fail to bring any evidence that this little girl in question never lived before and never engage in bad actions.
I already knew that you are all talking and zero substance.  

---

(March 10, 2018 at 2:12 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: I never finish to wonder how stupid can you be yog.

Atheists are there all the time to glorify physical science but physical science say that for every action there got to be and equal and opposite reaction.

You're referring to Newton's first law of motion, which, not surprisingly, applies only to motion of physical bodies.  Since it only applies to efficient, material causes, it is definitely not karma.  You're making the claim that because physical bodies can be described in this way that moral bodies can be described this way.  That's a claim, not an argument.  You need to show that Newton's first law of motion applies to moral properties, not simply claim it.  Otherwise you're just equivocating upon the meaning of the law.  So no, Newton's first law of motion doesn't demonstrate karma; karma is totally unrelated to the laws governing motion of physical bodies.

(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: This is karma in action.

No, it's not.  It's a description of efficient, material causes.  It has fuckall to do with karma.  What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: Karma goes hand in hand with this science that of course contradict atheists 100% and if there is karma obviously there is someone who run this karma.

Bullshit.  You can't simply extend laws of motion to imperceptible properties and hope it still holds.  Your claim that Newton's laws of motion demonstrate karma is false.

So, you still haven't provided any actual evidence of karma.

(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: Fail once again yog.

Someone once said, "First of all you only present one point among those who I already knock down in the previous post."  Likewise, you have utterly failed to demonstrate the existence of reincarnation which was the task that was set before you.  So in addition to being wrong about Newton's laws of motion, you've completely failed to address the actual topic.  Remember evolution?  It's in the title of the thread.  You have to demonstrate karma and reincarnation for your views on evolution to be valid.

Put up or shut up.  Provide evidence of reincarnation and karma or GTFO.  If you're going to invoke god, then you need to demonstrate him as well.

Try again, asswipe.  Your last post didn't accomplish shit.

More and more idiotic comments from you but after all what to expect from such an idiot.  

Science is all about searching and more searching but it seems that atheists gave up on searching.
In fact they never bother to search so science which is all about searching means absolutely nothing to them.

Take someone who born healthy and wealthy while somebody else born sick and poor.
Atheists don't really bother to know why.
For them is all about good or bad luck.
In this universe there is no such a thing as good or bad luck.
If that would be the case this universe never existed in the first place or if it would have started at one stage because of bad luck it would have already disintegrate but it never did and never will BECAUSE obviously someone run it.

Atheism is based on coincidences that is why searching goes down the sewer while fantasies reign supreme.

(March 10, 2018 at 11:19 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Informed people know that it is mattresses  - not computers - that breed in swamps.  Specifically, in the swamps of Sqornshellous Zeta, where they live (to be honest) rather pointless lives of follopping and vollueing.  If you weren't so stunningly pig-ignorant, you'd be aware of this.

This is so true. I am glad that someone has brought up this subject because it is one close to my heart. Due to humans encroaching upon the natural habitat of the mattresses, they have been forced to scavenge in towns looking for food. This is why you can often see them hanging around communal trash bins. Unfortunately this is very dangerous for them as doing so risks being collected and dumped in landfill. To raise money for mattress conservation, you can now buy a calendar featuring beautiful yet heartbreaking images of their struggle for survival.

Abandoned Mattresses Calendar 2018

Imagine if these guys spent as much time studying science as they did shooting their mouth off. They'd be schooling me by now, that's for sure.

The anti-science / pseudoscience side of religion makes me sad.

(March 10, 2018 at 2:39 pm)Banned Wrote:

(March 10, 2018 at 2:09 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: Exactly, They make it up as they go. Additionally, science can't be trusted as we both know, Can you think of one thing science ever gave us? I can't

Fun fact: No fossils actually exist, they are all plastic stand-ins to fool the masses.

RAmen brother.

Science has given us a lot, and it's methods are reasonable when it comes to practical applications, but when it comes to theory, that's just what it is, until proven.

And fossils? Do they support evolution?
Whole creatures trapped in mud?

Think very carefully on this one.

Fossil layers - are supposed to represent time periods of millions of years. Remember whole bodies fossilized in often upright positions in the layers, and sharing layers as well.

Let's say that one foot of a layer represents 1 million years of gradual desposition. How on earth does a fossil remain in tact partially buried for nearly a million years before it is finally covered?

Theories are in science are "facts" until then its a hypothesis.

Do fossils prove evolution. Cummulatively yes they do you can date then see the changes and progression of the species.

How do creatures stay in tact for millions of years? Mostly they don't but in very rare situations they do its down to what for us is a lucky set of circumstances.
But there has been a long time and a lot of animals.