Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:37 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 8:33 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:31 pm)chimp3 Wrote: They are all cousins. Closely related. All mammals sharing some very primary characteristics. If, in the 21st century you do not know this, you are an ignorant fool!
It's a simple yes or no question... are they distinct from one another or aren't they?
Distinct? They all have fur and mammary glands. Birds and reptiles do not! No mammals lay eggs. So, they are not distinct. They share similarities. Read a high school biology book before you comment on this subject!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:42 pm
Just like "god" and "spirituality", "kinds" means whatever is convenient for the current argument.
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:43 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 8:37 pm)chimp3 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:33 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's a simple yes or no question... are they distinct from one another or aren't they?
Distinct? They all have fur and mammary glands. Birds and reptiles do not! No mammals lay eggs. So, they are not distinct. They share similarities. Read a high school biology book before you comment on this subject!
Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:45 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 8:37 pm)chimp3 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:33 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's a simple yes or no question... are they distinct from one another or aren't they?
Distinct? They all have fur and mammary glands. Birds and reptiles do not! No mammals lay eggs. So, they are not distinct. They share similarities. Read a high school biology book before you comment on this subject! Actually there are mammals that lay eggs . But they still have fur and still nurse their young with milk . But huggy will keep shifting the differences were convenient
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:48 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 8:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:37 pm)chimp3 Wrote: Distinct? They all have fur and mammary glands. Birds and reptiles do not! No mammals lay eggs. So, they are not distinct. They share similarities. Read a high school biology book before you comment on this subject!
Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.
If you really knew me this would be an appropriate response. But, since we are talking about mammalian characteristics and not my lifelong sexual practices, I do not see how shame applies!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:50 pm
Quote:Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.
Nope pointing out all mammals are similar does not belong in the hall of shame . because as i already showed in my own comment they still have more in common then not .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:52 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 8:53 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 17, 2018 at 8:48 pm)chimp3 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.
If you really knew me this would be an appropriate response. But, since we are talking about mammalian characteristics and not my lifelong sexual practices, I do not see how shame applies!
You should be embarrassed by your statement of "no mammal lays eggs" alone...
(March 17, 2018 at 8:50 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Quote:Well, looks like we have another candidate for the hall of shame.
Nope pointing out all mammals are similar does not belong in the hall of shame . because as i already showed in my own comment they still have more in common then not .
Are all mammals identical?
Posts: 29647
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:54 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 9:00 pm by Angrboda.)
"Scientists have recently estimated that there are approximately 8.7 million species on Earth. They believe that 1-2 million of those species are animals."
That was one hellishly cramped ark if kind is equal to species.
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:58 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 8:52 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:48 pm)chimp3 Wrote: If you really knew me this would be an appropriate response. But, since we are talking about mammalian characteristics and not my lifelong sexual practices, I do not see how shame applies!
You should be embarrassed by your statement of "no mammal lays eggs" alone...
(March 17, 2018 at 8:50 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Nope pointing out all mammals are similar does not belong in the hall of shame . because as i already showed in my own comment they still have more in common then not .
Are all mammals identical? All mammals have common characteristics. That is why they are called "mammals" ! I learned this shit in grade school! Were you home schooled or did you just not pay attention?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 9:02 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 9:03 pm by Amarok.)
Quote:Are all mammals identical?
They don't need to be to refute your nonsense . They have a sweep of overarching characteristics. Which is why they are classified as mammals .
Quote:You should be embarrassed by your statement of "no mammal lays eggs" alone...
Nope considering their still mammals .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
