(May 2, 2018 at 3:37 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 3:32 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: You stated it was a fact. You studied every argument out there in the world pertaining to proofs for irreducible complexity of a system in nature?

As i said i don't need to . You have yet to provide such a system thus it is a fact such a system has not been presented . If such a system had been found it would be known because creationists wouldn't shut up about it.But even if it was found it would not render evolution defeated.

Quote:But since no system has ever been shown to be such . No ones worried .

Check mate

Creationists might be talking about a lot of these systems.   My experience with you Atheists is your not reliable means to assess whether something or something has not been proven.
 

Your line would make sense perhaps if you said something "no system has ever been shown to be such to me" and although I wouldn't know if that was true,  seeing how dishonest Atheists are with arguments that do prove God,  I might've been inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Talk about derailing a thread into Shitpostburg.

(May 2, 2018 at 3:44 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 3:37 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: As i said i don't need to . You have yet to provide such a system thus it is a fact such a system has not been presented . If such a system had been found it would be known because creationists wouldn't shut up about it.But even if it was found it would not render evolution defeated.


Check mate

Creationists might be talking about a lot of these systems.   My experience with you Atheists is your not reliable means to assess whether something or something has not been proven.
 

Your line would make sense perhaps if you said something "no system has ever been shown to be such to me" and although I wouldn't know if that was true,  seeing how dishonest Atheists are with arguments that do prove God,  I might've been inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Forget a lot of system how about one . As for your baseless opinion on atheists it's just that.

Nope i stand by my original state .Which is totally honest . If such a system or systems had been found they would be common knowledge because creationist would not stop mentioning them . So far no luck on their end . A we deal with your non evidence for god better then it deserves .

So again no such system has been presented .

---

(May 2, 2018 at 3:45 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Talk about derailing a thread into Shitpostburg.

Sorry i'll stop 

(May 2, 2018 at 3:52 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 3:44 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Creationists might be talking about a lot of these systems.   My experience with you Atheists is your not reliable means to assess whether something or something has not been proven.
 

Your line would make sense perhaps if you said something "no system has ever been shown to be such to me" and although I wouldn't know if that was true,  seeing how dishonest Atheists are with arguments that do prove God,  I might've been inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Forget a lot of system how about one . As for your baseless opinion on atheists it's just that.

Nope i stand by my original state .Which is totally honest . If such a system or systems had been found they would be common knowledge because creationist would not stop mentioning them . So far no luck on their end . A we deal with your non evidence for god better then it deserves .

So again no such system has been presented .

You can say the same thing with proofs of God and that is despite every civilization providing proof.

I challenge you to one on one debate than about this issue.  I believe there is plenty of systems, but ok, how about we just discuss one?

(May 2, 2018 at 3:52 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 3:44 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Creationists might be talking about a lot of these systems.   My experience with you Atheists is your not reliable means to assess whether something or something has not been proven.
 

Your line would make sense perhaps if you said something "no system has ever been shown to be such to me" and although I wouldn't know if that was true,  seeing how dishonest Atheists are with arguments that do prove God,  I might've been inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Forget a lot of system how about one . As for your baseless opinion on atheists it's just that.

Nope i stand by my original state .Which is totally honest . If such a system or systems had been found they would be common knowledge because creationist would not stop mentioning them . So far no luck on their end . A we deal with your non evidence for god better then it deserves .

So again no such system has been presented .

---

(May 2, 2018 at 3:45 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Talk about derailing a thread into Shitpostburg.

Sorry i'll stop 

Lol, it's not you that's driving the train.

Quote:You can say the same thing with proofs of God and that is despite every civilization providing proof.

Yes i can say the same thing to date theists have failed miserably 

Quote:I challenge you to one on one debate than about this issue.  I believe there is plenty of systems, but ok, how about we just discuss one?

Why would i do that? 

How do i benefit from such a contest ? 

If the 8 million threads you weave is not evidence enough your loopier than a box of cheerios what would a debate alter .

Alright, you don't want discuss a potential proof of an irreducible complex system, but I have to take your word on it than none has been shown.

(May 2, 2018 at 4:01 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Alright, you don't want discuss a potential proof of an irreducible complex system, but I have to take your word on it than none has been shown.

No you don't because if you did you would have already provided one with your opening boast . You don't have to take anything . But it remain not single ones been present thus far . So what conclusion can one draw?

For some reason lately MK reminds me of the creature from the black spittoon.

(May 2, 2018 at 4:04 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 4:01 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Alright, you don't want discuss a potential proof of an irreducible complex system, but I have to take your word on it than none has been shown.

No you don't because if you did you would have already provided one with your opening boast . You don't have to take anything . But it remain not single ones been present thus far . So what conclusion can one draw?

I don't know bro, but keep it up with the non-sequiturs if it helps you sleep.