(May 13, 2018 at 3:04 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 2:58 pm)Hammy Wrote: I'll pick the 'no designer' option then, please.

Sorry, you lose, wrong bet.

Science supports evolution by natural selection so I doubt it's the wrong bet.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:06 pm)Hammy Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:04 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Sorry, you lose, wrong bet.

Science supports evolution by natural selection so I doubt it's the wrong bet.

Science supports design by a Creator as seen with information inside of DNA.

162 pages??

I'm glad I haven't read the whole thing. It, like any ongoing creationist nonsense, is like a slow lobotomy.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:18 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:06 pm)Hammy Wrote: Science supports evolution by natural selection so I doubt it's the wrong bet.

Science supports design by a Creator as seen with information inside of DNA.

Only mad science.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:25 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:18 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Science supports design by a Creator as seen with information inside of DNA.

Only mad science.

Actually some brilliant scientists support it.  There are more scientists in the US that believe in a higher power than there are atheist scientists.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:26 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Actually some brilliant scientists support it.  There are more scientists in the US that believe in a higher power than there are atheist scientists.

As I've already explained:

A good scientist can hold silly religious beliefs and still be good at his job so long as he keeps both separate, unless he's an ID scientist; at that point, he's just lost his way entirely.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:26 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:25 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Only mad science.

Actually some brilliant scientists support it.  There are more scientists in the US that believe in a higher power than there are atheist scientists.

Then you'll believe that your are in good company. The rest of us will either point and laugh or sigh.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:30 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:26 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Actually some brilliant scientists support it.  There are more scientists in the US that believe in a higher power than there are atheist scientists.

As I've already explained:

A good scientist can hold silly religious beliefs and still be good at his job so long as he keeps both separate, unless he's an ID scientist; at that point, he's just lost his way entirely.

There are brilliant scientists that are ID scientists.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:39 am)Kit Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:25 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: Again, no. Why don’t you shut the fuck up and let real scientist doing real science using real scientific methods tdetermine what signs they see and not see, and stop pretending your bible addled mind gives you leave to pipe up in any serious discussion?

If you're simply going to paste the same response to him over and over again, at least have the decency to use proper spelling and grammar.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:43 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:30 pm)Kit Wrote:

As I've already explained:

A good scientist can hold silly religious beliefs and still be good at his job so long as he keeps both separate, unless he's an ID scientist; at that point, he's just lost his way entirely.

There are brilliant scientists that are ID scientists.

The fact that you have point this out indicate what an exception it is even in your mind and by your dubious standard of what is science and your wacko idea of who really is practicing it.

(May 13, 2018 at 3:26 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(May 13, 2018 at 3:25 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Only mad science.

Actually some brilliant scientists support it.  There are more scientists in the US that believe in a higher power than there are atheist scientists.

Going with that idea, I don't see a problem with a scientist also believing in a higher power/God. I think that science and faith can coexist, but there are some areas where they could collide. But, I believe in God, and also have a love and respect for science.