(May 16, 2018 at 6:08 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Not quite.  You are just in denial that science now proves a Creator.

If such a feat had been accomplished, I guarantee a Nobel, at the very least, would have been awarded. Since it has not......

(May 16, 2018 at 5:27 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(May 16, 2018 at 5:05 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I am speaking science to you.  Information proves a Creator.  I believe to a certain extent micro-evolutionary biology is used as part of the implementation of God's design.  Neo-Darwinism is what is faulty.  This is shown in Cambrian Explosion and in the fossil record.  Stephen C. Meyer wrote a book about Darwin's doubt regarding the Cambrian Explosion.  

Do you deny there is an abundance of functional information in DNA?  Do you agree that there are molecular machines that perform amazing functions at a nano-scale?  Do you believe the universe is fine-tuned?  Do you believe in the Big Bang Theory, that the universe had a beginning?

You are not speaking science.  You are demonstrating your utter ignorant of the underlying principles of science.  All you are doing using what you conceive to be sciency terms to attempt to disseminate garbage from anti-science creationist hucksters masquerading as scientists before gullible fools like you.  You somehow imagined that by adopting a ever more stentorian volume, repetition of the same tripe coumd eventually overwhelm the absurdity of the garbage you spew, and somehow overawe those with considerably deeper and broader knowledge of real science than either you or your intelligent design huckster hero’s.

No, I am not.  They are providing the scientific information I never received in school and I went to a religious Catholic school high school and an engineering university.  I haven't seen anything in these forums that compares to the knowledge of the ID scientists.

---

(May 16, 2018 at 5:29 pm)Khemikal Wrote: You don;t believe in evolutionary biology CDF..so you can;t really point to the assumption of it;s truth as proof of your hilarious cults belief that it's false.

It's a good thing this level of stupidity isn;t a requirement for christianity..or there wouldn;t be many christians in the world.

I believe in micro-evolution.

---

(May 16, 2018 at 6:13 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 16, 2018 at 6:08 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Not quite.  You are just in denial that science now proves a Creator.

If such a feat had been accomplished, I guarantee a Nobel, at the very least, would have been awarded. Since it has not......

There is an agenda against it.

(May 16, 2018 at 6:13 pm)CDF47 Wrote: There is an agenda against it.

Nonsense.

(May 16, 2018 at 6:19 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 16, 2018 at 6:13 pm)CDF47 Wrote: There is an agenda against it.

Nonsense.

Truth.  Watch Expelled movie.

(May 16, 2018 at 6:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Truth.  Watch Expelled movie.

You continuing to peddle that movie does not make your assertions in any way more truthful.

(May 16, 2018 at 6:21 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 16, 2018 at 6:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Truth.  Watch Expelled movie.

You continuing to peddle that movie does not make your assertions in any way more truthful.

It shows the truth of the agenda against ID, like you see on this site.

(May 16, 2018 at 6:23 pm)CDF47 Wrote: It shows the truth of the agenda against ID, like you see on this site.

Recognizing ID as pseudo-science is not an agenda. It's simply preferring real science over the fake stuff you want to peddle that is just as illogical as religious beliefs.

(May 16, 2018 at 6:25 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 16, 2018 at 6:23 pm)CDF47 Wrote: It shows the truth of the agenda against ID, like you see on this site.

Recognizing ID as pseudo-science is not an agenda.  It's simply preferring real science over the fake stuff you want to peddle that is just as illogical as religious beliefs.

DNA has nested coding.  DNA has a files within folders hierarchical structure.  A senior Microsoft software engineer says DNA follows similar Design Patterns (design manual) which Microsoft uses for software development.  Bill Gates also stated that DNA is like a software program but one far more advanced than they have been able to devise. 

We know language and computer codes come only from one source which is intelligence.  DNA is a language and a code so it to must come from intelligence.  

(May 16, 2018 at 6:31 pm)CDF47 Wrote: DNA has nested coding.  DNA has a files within folders hierarchical structure.  A senior Microsoft software engineer says DNA follows similar Design Patterns (design manual) which Microsoft uses for software development.  Bill Gates also stated that DNA is like a software program but one far more advanced than they have been able to devise. 

We know language and computer codes come only from one source which is intelligence.  DNA is a language and a code so it to must come from intelligence.  

No, it mustn't.

(May 16, 2018 at 6:33 pm)Kit Wrote:

(May 16, 2018 at 6:31 pm)CDF47 Wrote: DNA has nested coding.  DNA has a files within folders hierarchical structure.  A senior Microsoft software engineer says DNA follows similar Design Patterns (design manual) which Microsoft uses for software development.  Bill Gates also stated that DNA is like a software program but one far more advanced than they have been able to devise. 

We know language and computer codes come only from one source which is intelligence.  DNA is a language and a code so it to must come from intelligence.  

No, it mustn't.

Yes, information (the code) must have come from an intelligence.  It is highly specific and complex and functional.  It sequences amino acids to program protein/molecular component and molecular machine construction and operation.