Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 21, 2026, 12:48 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
the god created science argument
#11
RE: the god created science argument
Ok. So your sayin the laws of physics. Has shown supernatural tendencies. Physics is I'm sure u know the basis of how the universe works
Bill Maher: If you believe that the world is going to come to an end - and perhaps any day now - does it not drain one's motivation to improve life on earth while we're here?
Reply
#12
RE: the god created science argument
"There is no empirical evidence for or against spirit."

I'll send a shout out for Ace here and suggest the application of Ockham's Razor at this juncture.
Trying to update my sig ...
Reply
#13
RE: the god created science argument
Absalutely. Ockham's or if you will Occam's (two ways of spelling it) should always be applied.
"The simplest explanation for some phenomenon is more likely to be accurate than more complicated explanations." In this case, the simplest explanation is that you're mistaken.

Stick to the simplest till there is evidence for the more complex.
Opt for the explanation requiring the fewest assumptions.

"We could still imagine that there is a set of laws that determines events completely for some supernatural being, who could observe the present state of the universe without disturbing it. However, it seems better to employ the principle known as Occam's razor and cut out all the features of the theory for which cannot be observed."
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
#14
RE: the god created science argument
Quote:Where do you get the idea that physics disproves God? Science has nothing to say about the supernatural


IF you believe in a god it is up to you to provide evidence for him. Its your proposal - you defend it. Science shows us that your god is an unnecessary bit of twaddle in the discussion


So far all I've seen from you before I lost interest in your ramblings was that you looked at a landscape and thought jesus grabbed your dick or some such nonsense.
Reply
#15
RE: the god created science argument
If something really exists, it can be discovered.

If it can be discovered, it can be studied.

If it can be studied, it can be understood.

If it can be understood, it can be explained.

If it can be explained, it's part of the natural universe.

Ergo, "supernatural" that exists is natural.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#16
RE: the god created science argument
(September 18, 2011 at 6:07 am)lucent Wrote: Where do you get the idea that physics disproves God? Science has nothing to say about the supernatural. There is no empirical evidence for or against spirit.

Well, actually science has a lot to say about the supernatural. The field is called neurotheology. http://www.npr.org/2010/12/15/132078267/...ce-collide just look it up on google. Just another example of how the supernatural becomes natural.

Reply
#17
RE: the god created science argument
The god spot.
http://atheistempire.com/reference/brain/main.html

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
#18
RE: the god created science argument
(September 18, 2011 at 4:07 pm)weakagnostic Wrote: Well, actually science has a lot to say about the supernatural. The field is called neurotheology. http://www.npr.org/2010/12/15/132078267/...ce-collide just look it up on google. Just another example of how the supernatural becomes natural.

All this says is that if one calms down and takes control of their life, things will get better. It specifically states "...neurotheology won't provide definitive findings about things like the existence of a higher power...".

Supernatural does not come into play at all. Why? Because 'supernatural' does not exist. Basically, it nothing more than an oxymoron. If it exists, it is natural.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
#19
RE: the god created science argument
That is because nature could be described as "all that is".... Or at least that is the way I see it.
Cunt
Reply
#20
RE: the god created science argument
.....
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Kalam Cosmological argument. JJoseph 113 27342 January 10, 2024 at 12:38 am
Last Post: Astreja
  A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work. JJoseph 23 6928 January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 39103 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Is the Argument from Degrees contradictory to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics? FlatAssembler 49 11532 June 26, 2023 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 14654 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 40938 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 11321 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 60895 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What is the best counter argument against "What do you lose by believing?" Macoleco 25 5338 May 1, 2021 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Watchmaker: my fav argument zwanzig 672 191308 March 31, 2021 at 11:34 am
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)