(October 30, 2018 at 10:34 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

That's quite amusing. Wrong, totally wrong but amusing.

Not amusing considering children in Africa are starving and yet the likes of him consumes food.

(October 30, 2018 at 10:30 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:

(October 30, 2018 at 9:28 pm)CDF47 Wrote: That last 2000 years are the end times just waiting for the Lord to return and gather His people.

---

Faith.  Thankfully, the Lord gave us the information in DNA to know a Creator exists to strengthen faith; especially for technical people like me.

LOL. 
You are not exactly a "technical" person. You don't even get the science of the flood.

Quote:It is the only religion which talks of creation in real terms aside from Islam and Judaism.  

Actually it isn't. You just never studied religions.

Quote:There are prophecies fulfilled in the Bible hundreds of years after it was written.  Jesus is prophesied numerous times in the Old Testament.  

The role of a prophet was not to tell the future. This is the ignorance of Fundamentalism. Omen reading was forbidden.

Quote:Also, the science stands up unlike with Islam. I also believe with the new information we find in DNA we find a Creator who is active in His creation which I believe destroys the deist belief.

You also know no basic chemistry. You see things that are not there, due to your complete ignorance.
You can repeat this shit until kingdom come, it won't be true then either. It's nonsense. Nothing but rubbish.

That's your opinion.

The prophet predicted the future at times when interpreting dreams and visions.  Jesus was predicted.  The Book of Daniel has much prophecy in it about future kingdoms using symbolic language.  It is really interesting and cool to read and understand the prophecies.

Whyyyyyyyy is it still here?! ?

(October 30, 2018 at 11:06 pm)CDF47 Wrote:

(October 30, 2018 at 10:30 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: LOL. 
You are not exactly a "technical" person. You don't even get the science of the flood.


Actually it isn't. You just never studied religions.


The role of a prophet was not to tell the future. This is the ignorance of Fundamentalism. Omen reading was forbidden.


You also know no basic chemistry. You see things that are not there, due to your complete ignorance.
You can repeat this shit until kingdom come, it won't be true then either. It's nonsense. Nothing but rubbish.

That's your opinion.

The prophet predicted the future at times when interpreting dreams and visions.  Jesus was predicted.  The Book of Daniel has much prophecy in it about future kingdoms using symbolic language.  It is really interesting and cool to read and understand the prophecies.

That's interesting. You think Daniel was accurate despite getting everything wrong. How do you reconcile that?

At work.

(October 30, 2018 at 11:02 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(October 30, 2018 at 10:34 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: That's quite amusing. Wrong, totally wrong but amusing.

Not amusing considering children in Africa are starving and yet the likes of him consumes food.

The plight of those suffering Africa and , truth be told other ravaged places in the world are a far more complicated fix than the simple ramblings here might address.

So, slalloming back into the topic, an intetesting question to the OP is in regards to the DNA and all the things it does not support by way of the OP's assertions.

Some of which have already been pointed out.

I.E.

Lack of evidence for drastic genetic bottle-necks.

That mitochondrial Eve is dated many thousands of years apart from the genes of the so called Adam.

That the myriad evidences for theory of evolution indicate a 'Deeper' amount of time than the OP allots.

The list goes on.

Strange, nay almost cherry picked, seem the OP's limited fixations

(October 31, 2018 at 3:22 am)CDF47 Wrote: How do you determine a genetic bottle neck for the flood?

How accurate do you think mitochondrial Eve and Y Chromosome Adam genetic dates actually are?  We are talking about ancestors of the human race that existed 50,000 - 450,000 years ago.

I believe in OEC and day-age interpretation which dates the universe as 13.8 billion years old and the Earth 4.54 billion years old.

But creationism doesn't tally with the way living things developed. We know the process that allows for the development of complex life and god is not part of the process at any stage.
What you believe is patently wrong.

(October 31, 2018 at 3:22 am)CDF47 Wrote:

(October 31, 2018 at 1:49 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: The plight of those suffering Africa and , truth be told  other ravaged places in the world are a far more complicated fix than the simple ramblings here might address.

So, slalloming back into the topic, an intetesting question to the OP is in regards to the DNA and all the things it does not support by way of the OP's assertions.

Some of which have already been pointed out.

I.E.

Lack of evidence for drastic genetic bottle-necks.

That mitochondrial Eve is dated many thousands of years apart from the genes of the so called Adam.

That the myriad evidences for theory of evolution indicate a 'Deeper' amount of time than the OP allots.

The list goes on.

Strange, nay almost cherry picked, seem the OP's limited fixations

How do you determine a genetic bottle neck for the flood?

How accurate do you think mitochondrial Eve and Y Chromosome Adam genetic dates actually are?  We are talking about ancestors of the human race that existed 50,000 - 450,000 years ago.

I believe in OEC and day-age interpretation which dates the universe as 13.8 billion years old and the Earth 4.54 billion years old.

 I stand corrected on your view of the age of reality. *Bows*

As for "How do you determine a genetic bottle neck" ?

On the technical aspects I must deffer to other possible forum members more knowledgable than I.

My point is that human genetics do NOT show any sort of hall marks of a genetic bottle neck where the entire human genome was reducde to around a dozen people. A species that I understand to have suffered a serious genetic bottle neck is the African Cheeta. Reading how such a problem effects said animals should make for interesting reading.

By all counts (I think it was the forum member Mathilda?) who pointed out that for a populatiopn to continue to survive a minimum of about 10, 00 indiviuals have to survive and be able to then increase the population numbers.

Not at work.

(October 30, 2018 at 7:10 pm)CDF47 Wrote:   I think ...

Would that you could.