CD - Your lord is a fantasy, a delusion. As men & women, we invent gods and we can take them away at our will.

They are in a better place now.........The fictional section of your local library.

(December 22, 2018 at 11:17 pm)Rahn127 Wrote: CD - Your lord is a fantasy, a delusion. As men & women, we invent gods and we can take them away at our will.

They are in a better place now.........The fictional section of your local library.

Conjecture.  I wonder if that's what happened to the dinosaurs.  They were too busy pondering how meteors couldn't exist that they didn't bother to take cover when the meteors started to make impact.  I heard one T-Rex almost made in into his hut, but he couldn't quite reach the door in time.

(December 22, 2018 at 11:37 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:

(December 22, 2018 at 11:17 pm)Rahn127 Wrote: CD - Your lord is a fantasy, a delusion. As men & women, we invent gods and we can take them away at our will.

They are in a better place now.........The fictional section of your local library.

Conjecture.  I wonder if that's what happened to the dinosaurs.  They were too busy pondering how meteors couldn't exist that they didn't bother to take cover when the meteors started to make impact.  I heard one T-Rex almost made in into his hut, but he couldn't quite reach the door in time.

Things that exist or existed in your reply.

Dinosaurs - they existed. Lots of fossil evidence
Meteors exist. We see them all the time on a clear dark night.
Meteorites exist. We find them from time to time.
T-Rex existed. Again fossil evidence.
Doors exist, as well as huts.

Can you guess what doesn't exist ?

(December 22, 2018 at 11:50 pm)Rahn127 Wrote:

(December 22, 2018 at 11:37 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Conjecture.  I wonder if that's what happened to the dinosaurs.  They were too busy pondering how meteors couldn't exist that they didn't bother to take cover when the meteors started to make impact.  I heard one T-Rex almost made in into his hut, but he couldn't quite reach the door in time.

Things that exist or existed in your reply.

Dinosaurs - they existed. Lots of fossil evidence
Meteors exist. We see them all the time on a clear dark night.
Meteorites exist. We find them from time to time.
T-Rex existed. Again fossil evidence.
Doors exist, as well as huts.

Can you guess what doesn't exist ?

I guess you missed it.  It has to do with "conjecture."  You're applying fallacies to your thought process and coming to conclusions based on them.  Same thing you're going on about in another thread.  Dream physics and punching through walls.  Maybe relax a bit.

(December 22, 2018 at 12:15 pm)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote:

(December 22, 2018 at 12:11 pm)CDF47 Wrote: The proof is in the information for the millionth time. 

I've told you a million times not to exaggerate.

That's not exaggerated at all.

(December 23, 2018 at 1:27 am)CDF47 Wrote:

(December 22, 2018 at 12:15 pm)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote: I've told you a million times not to exaggerate.

That's not exaggerated at all.

WOOSH!

Quote:Maybe interpret your own life, not mine.

I'm always multi-tasking online out of necessity, so no big deal to respond to things here.  Also, maybe read things in context.  I don't try to convince anybody they have to think a certain way.  If I share information, it's up to whoever to decide what to do with it, even if it's telling me to go fetch a stick because they don't care.  I just process it and move forward.   Have a good one.

Maybe if I need advice, I'll be sure and ask. 
You clearly care, or you would not be here. "Out of necessity" ... LOL
So you're being forced to post here .... LMAO. Don't be stupid.

@ CDF47:

Summary of failures to date:

You have failed to prove DNA was created by an intelligent designer.
You have failed to prove the existence of God.
You have failed to demonstrate that modern evolutionary theory is unreliable.
You have repeatedly conflated science with religion.
You have repeatedly demonstrated your dogmatic, inflexible thinking.
You have repeatedly demonstrated your crass ignorance and unwillingness to learn.
You have failed to prove that the Bible is true.
You have failed to prove the historicity of any biblical prophecies.
You have failed to demonstrate that any of the biblical scholars I referenced above are, in fact, atheists.
You have failed to demonstrate that any of them have an atheist agenda.

Any one here care to add to that list?

At work.

CDF47 constantly fails with their bizarre insistence that DNA is a 'Binary' code. When the molecule is made up of three sets of different nucleotides.

They have also failed to explain why DNA must operate in a triplet fashion as opposed to:

Dual; It would be 'simpler' and less resource intensive.
Quadruplex; it would be more robust to coding errors due to increased redundancies as well as being able to create a greater difference of amino acids (Current DNA codes for just 21 or 2
Quintuple; As well as being even more robust. This amount of coding would be able to transcribe ALL 110 known amino acids.

No explanation has been given as to why a pentose (5 sided) sugar/nucleic form is the 'Back bone' of the DNA as opposed to a Hexose (6 sided) form.

Why a carbohydrate sugar should form said chain instead of an even mord robust peptide chain.

(December 23, 2018 at 6:51 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: @ CDF47:

Summary of failures to date:

You have failed to prove DNA was created by an intelligent designer.
You have failed to prove the existence of God.
You have failed to demonstrate that modern evolutionary theory is unreliable.
You have repeatedly conflated science with religion.
You have repeatedly demonstrated your dogmatic, inflexible thinking.
You have repeatedly demonstrated your crass ignorance and unwillingness to learn.
You have failed to prove that the Bible is true.
You have failed to prove the historicity of any biblical prophecies.
You have failed to demonstrate that any of the biblical scholars I referenced above are, in fact, atheists.
You have failed to demonstrate that any of them have an atheist agenda.

Any one here care to add to that list?

I would posit that MrInquisition has also failed to demonstrate a working understanding of evidence.