I assume that homosexuality is a natural state. A specie destructive one too <-- which I think is the classical objection to it.

I went to a series of church meetings where it was openly discussed. You had your flamers who said their piece and stormed out. An ordained clergyman told us how he believed that he was born gay. I believed him.

I think society isn't quite right with homosexuality still. There was a great bit in around the world in 80 faiths (uk TV series) where this trendy vicar travelled the worlds religious hot spots... visited a mountain monastery of all male monks, who just naturally cuddled each other openly, slept together and fostered loving relationships with each other.

I think by this point we can all agree that salty is just a brain-addled God slave, has really stupid and ignorant views on this topic, is unable to qualify her position beyond basically shrieking 'THAT DOESNT GO THERE' and is unable to remove the Bible from her arsehole and form a reasonable opinion.

To pre-empt the predictable and incorrect response, nobody has dismissed out of hand any point you've made, salty. In fact, this conversation has gone on an embarrassingly long time considering the lack of reason you've displayed. No, we don't have to 'respect' points of view just because people hold them, if the reasons for holding them are abhorrent and based on nothing, like yours.

She is pretty much just saying "EWWW, That's icky!"

No... you guys are saying pretty much what she's saying but disagreeing at the same time. Watch for the back slapping when an atheist mysoginist speaks up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klXUOM4wtT8

---

(October 5, 2011 at 7:38 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: No... you guys are saying pretty much what she's saying but disagreeing at the same time. Watch for the back slapping when an atheist mysoginist speaks up

Care to qualify that?

That is because she adds on the bit about it being immoral... I understand that a penis is not designed to fuck an anus, but I don't see it as immoral as a result of that... Coz that is a bit silly

I apologise in advance for what I am about to say, I don't make a habit of being deliberately insulting. Salty, if your words are a true reflection of the way your mind works, then in my honest opinion you are not only astonishingly deluded about human nature (amongst other things) but also possibly one of the most revolting people I have interacted with for quite some time. I can understand if love between two people of the same sex isn't your particular cup of tea, it's not mine either. However, the difference between me and thee is I don't imagine I have the right to impose my values into other people's lives. I don't usually judge others by whether their actions are natural or not - you're sitting at a computer and making your opinions known to people across the planet, how natural is that?

As long as innocent bystanders are not harmed, whatever two or more people choose to do is their own business and nothing to do with you or anybody else. That also includes the bedroom, which is even less to do with you (unless you're invited). This is the twenty-first century; why does any of this still need saying?

Homosexuality is abnormal. Studies have shown it to be potentially treatable.

More funding should be allocated to cure this abnormality. Of course people afflicted with this disease should retain the right to decide to opt for, or opt out undergoing treatment.

What if I like fucking my girlfriend in the ass? is their treatment for that?

(October 5, 2011 at 8:08 pm)cdog Wrote: What if I like fucking my girlfriend in the ass? is their treatment for that?

Probably aversion therapy - you just keep doing it until you've had enough.