Please educate yourself on the "BASIC" in Logic. lol

---

The word "No God", can it be:

1. True (1), OR
2. False (0)

?

---

The definition of Atheism...

atheism. n. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Is this a declarative statement or a dogma/religious? lol

Can it be

1. True (1)? or
2. False (0)?

Logic failed! lol

(March 2, 2019 at 12:08 pm)Mahdi Ibrahim Wrote: The word "No God", can it be:

1. True (1), OR
2. False (0)

?

"No god" is two words, you numpty. 

(March 2, 2019 at 12:08 pm)Mahdi Ibrahim Wrote: Please educate yourself on the "BASIC" in Logic. lol

---

The word "No God", can it be:

1. True, OR
2. False

?

Your first string of words, again, makes little to no sense.

'Basic' as in simple? 'Basic' as in fundamental?

You can actually reply to the second string of words where two words of "No god" are emphasised with.

1) True,

Or,

2) False,

Or,

3) I do not know,

Or,

4) Maybe.


Also... is the combining of those two words a question.

If so you should really apply a "?" to the end of them to better help others understand your position/thoughts with more clarity.

However I do feel we are making progrees with you use of English so bravo.

atheism. n. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

1. Is a religious claim, a religion (nothing to do with science, logic, philosophy etc)
2. Is the belief in God(s) (320,000,000 Gods)
3. Is the disbelief in God(s) (320,000,000 Gods)

So your definition confirms that you have 320,000,000 Gods for worshipping ... lol 

---

Logic failed! 

---

Which is better argument between...

1. No God? <- Level 7, Strong Atheist
2. atheism. n. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods!?

(March 2, 2019 at 12:18 pm)Mahdi Ibrahim Wrote: atheism. n. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

1. Is a religious claim, a religion (nothing to do with science, logic, philosophy etc)
2. Is the belief in God(s) (320,000,000 Gods)
3. Is the disbelief in God(s) (320,000,000 Gods)

So your definition confirms that you have 320,000,000 Gods for worshipping ... lol 

---

Logic failed!

 You...  really show that you have little to no grasp of the English language.

 There are many nuanced variations of just the term 'Atheist'.

You even post an image of MULTIPLE words with MULITPLE meainings and then conflate them all into one large, straw-man-esque comment.

A dictionary is just a book of agreed upon definitions of words. it is NOT, however, an exhaustive authority on how those words are used in a language.

Your very obvious and telling lack of understanding of the English words you post is all to often in evidence when ever you post something. Heck, you have to resport to posting pictures because it seems your grasp of English is so poor.

Please stop trying to tell native speakers what they 'Say' when you, yourself, have a very rudimentary grasp of the language you are using.

Please go back to using simpler strings of words so that your ideas can be transferred a little better.

---

---

(March 2, 2019 at 12:18 pm)Mahdi Ibrahim Wrote:

---

Which is better argument between...

1. No God? <- Level 7, Strong Atheist
2. atheism. n. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods!?

Neither.

That is NOT how 'Arguments' work. You have been explained this previously and on/in multiple posts.

Also 'Quote mining' (The act of taking only a small prtion of a longer statement so as to misrepresent a position) is frowned upon aroud here and might have you being called such terms as 'Dishonest twat-waffle'.

So which is a better argument between...

1. No God? <- Level 7, Strong Atheist
2. atheism. n. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods!? 320,000,000 GODS! 



English fail or Logic fail? lol

(March 2, 2019 at 12:46 pm)Mahdi Ibrahim Wrote: So which is a better argument between...

1. No God? <- Level 7, Strong Atheist
2. atheism. n. disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods!? 320,000,000 GODS! 

 English fail or Logic fail?

 Neither of those two string of words would constitute an 'Argument'.

At best they both might be called 'Statements'.... but to make them an 'Argument'?

You have to give/add more explanation or exposition.

Yes, your English use has again failed.

Who is saying it is an argument?

I'm saying it is the premise (reason / the declarative statement) for the argument "Allah exist, you have no existence".. Please improve your logic or I.Q. lol


لا إله إلا الله

First Premise: No God (matter) <-- here is the premise
Second Premise: Only Energy (Light)
-------------------------------------------------------
Argument: Allah exist, you have no existence. <-- here is the argument
-------------------------------------------------------

(March 2, 2019 at 12:53 pm)Mahdi Ibrahim Wrote: Who is saying it is an argument?

I'm saying it is the premise (reason / the declarative statement) for the argument "Allah exist, you have no existence".. Please improve your logic.  lol


لا إله إلا الله

First Premise: No God (matter) <-- here is the premise
Second Premise: Only Energy (Light)
-------------------------------------------------------
Argument: Allah exist, you have no existence. <-- here is the argument
-------------------------------------------------------

 You just did in the previous post. Go back and read the first row of words.

They litterally spell out.

"So which is a better argument between..."

Yes, your 'Argument' (As you point out) is not an understandable string of words in the English language.

It's not even an 'Argument' as it is simply a single string of words using the English language.

Please improve your language skills.

"You can't fix stupid, and stupid can't fix themselves"