Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 5, 2025, 12:34 am
Thread Rating:
[Quranic reflection]: hell is a black hole-part III
|
I saw a video where there was a tiny chance that the universe is the inside of a black hole.
Hell is here on Earth, for those who create suffering for themselves or others - so there is a tiny chance Winterhold is metaphorically right? (April 14, 2022 at 10:51 am)HappySkeptic Wrote: I saw a video where there was a tiny chance that the universe is the inside of a black hole. We need a Pick your favorite Simulation holiday! I could show-up at my office, pretend to work and get paid!! (April 14, 2022 at 6:37 am)Jehanne Wrote: Black holes evaporate due to Hawking radiation. Does this mean that Hell is not eternal? The life of a black hole is shockingly long: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation Quote:A supermassive black hole with a mass of 1011 (100 billion) M☉ will evaporate in around 2×10100 years That's eternity.
Needs more ostriches.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
RE: [Quranic reflection]: hell is a black hole-part III
April 14, 2022 at 12:22 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2022 at 12:26 pm by WinterHold.)
(April 14, 2022 at 10:08 am)Ranjr Wrote: Why even make an argument that hell is place in the universe? Wouldn't it be in some spiritual realm where the soul can feel spiritual torture. Because a ghost can't feel anything in the physical world. Unless, of course, Whoopi Goldberg is involved. Because the Quran doesn't make any sense unless the reader believes that what's mentioned in it is real 100%. In this age, we discovered that over 80% of all matter in the universe is made up of material scientists have never seen. Black holes even look us in the face but we can't see them but we can only measure their effect on the surrounding bodies. The word spiritual is what ancients used to describe phenomena they can't understand. (April 14, 2022 at 10:51 am)HappySkeptic Wrote: I saw a video where there was a tiny chance that the universe is the inside of a black hole. I always think about life as a "limited, timed trial" that must end; but there are fates worse than it's suffering; like spending 2×10100 years in a black hole. (April 14, 2022 at 12:11 pm)WinterHold Wrote:(April 14, 2022 at 6:37 am)Jehanne Wrote: Black holes evaporate due to Hawking radiation. Does this mean that Hell is not eternal? Ducks, though, rarely live beyond 7 or 8 years. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
RE: [Quranic reflection]: hell is a black hole-part III
April 14, 2022 at 12:46 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2022 at 12:47 pm by Abaddon_ire.)
(April 14, 2022 at 12:22 pm)WinterHold Wrote:We have photos of them, moron.(April 14, 2022 at 10:08 am)Ranjr Wrote: Why even make an argument that hell is place in the universe? Wouldn't it be in some spiritual realm where the soul can feel spiritual torture. Because a ghost can't feel anything in the physical world. Unless, of course, Whoopi Goldberg is involved. (April 14, 2022 at 12:22 pm)WinterHold Wrote: The word spiritual is what ancients used to describe phenomena they can't understand.Then EVERYTHING must be "spiritual" to you, because you appear to understand nothing. (April 14, 2022 at 12:22 pm)WinterHold Wrote: I always think about life as a "limited, timed trial" that must end; but there are fates worse than it's suffering; like spending 2×10100 years in a black hole.Hmm. I never knew you were able to think. You seem to read your magic book, make up nonsense and then simply come to a dead halt. No thinking required for you, is there? (April 14, 2022 at 12:22 pm)WinterHold Wrote: Because the Quran doesn't make any sense unless the reader believes that what's mentioned in it is real 100%. So you reinterpret the Quran in an attempt to fit modern science. However, future science could increase our knowledge of black holes and change the way we describe them. Then, you will have to reinterpret again. That's how the sharpshooter fallacy you so often use is invalid. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)