Posts: 10827
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 12:50 pm
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2023 at 1:07 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 27285
Threads: 519
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 2:21 pm
(January 28, 2023 at 11:26 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: (January 27, 2023 at 5:48 pm)brewer Wrote: Did you actually read/understand that this is a conspiracy site?
So what if somebody is posting conspiracy theory stuff there? Every claim needs to be analyzed independently. You don't get to dismiss every logical argument just because it is on a website that is also hosting conspiracy theory stuff. Besides, it seems to me that the term "conspiracy theory" has been applied to quite a lot of things that are not actual conspiracy theories, all in an effort to discredit them.
Logical??? 
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Posts: 2020
Threads: 133
Joined: July 26, 2017
Reputation:
5
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:00 pm
(January 28, 2023 at 12:50 pm)Helios Wrote: And no the Vaccine isn't causing any of that.... 
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/medica...thats-hoax
https://www.tctmd.com/news/reports-sudde...nformation
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nco...vents.html
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-co...9195878254
It's a hoax plain and simple.
I feel like you are trying to Gish-Gallop me. Of those 4 web-pages you linked me, only the last one even addresses the study the AMG News is talking about. The third one is not even talking about heart issues, it is talking about kidney issues.
The methodology of the 2 studies that the AMG News study is building upon may be different, but does that really account for the recent one giving 17 times larger result than the older one? 17 times? Really? Until you point to a better study, the AMG News study is the best data we have. If you think it's enough to complain about the flaws in methodology to discard a study, read up on conspiracy theorists (perhaps The Mad Revisionists - the conspiracy theorists who claim the Moon doesn't exist) and consider the matters again. You cannot manufacture the truth by discarding the evidence. That's not how science works. The study that AMG News is talking about is, until you point to a better study, the best data we have.
Posts: 2020
Threads: 133
Joined: July 26, 2017
Reputation:
5
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:05 pm
(January 28, 2023 at 2:21 pm)brewer Wrote: (January 28, 2023 at 11:26 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: So what if somebody is posting conspiracy theory stuff there? Every claim needs to be analyzed independently. You don't get to dismiss every logical argument just because it is on a website that is also hosting conspiracy theory stuff. Besides, it seems to me that the term "conspiracy theory" has been applied to quite a lot of things that are not actual conspiracy theories, all in an effort to discredit them.
Logical???
OK, fine, they are empirical arguments, so maybe they are not logical arguments if we want to be extremely precise.
Posts: 10827
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:08 pm
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2023 at 4:09 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:I feel like you are trying to Gish-Gallop me. Of those 4 web-pages you linked me, only the last one even addresses the study the AMG News is talking about. The third one is not even talking about heart issues, it is talking about kidney issues.
The methodology of the 2 studies that the AMG News study is building upon may be different, but does that really account for the recent one giving 17 times larger result than the older one? 17 times? Really? Until you point to a better study, the AMG News study is the best data we have. If you think it's enough to complain about the flaws in methodology to discard a study, read up on conspiracy theorists (perhaps The Mad Revisionists - the conspiracy theorists who claim the Moon doesn't exist) and consider the matters again. You cannot manufacture the truth by discarding the evidence. That's not how science works. The study that AMG News is talking about is, until you point to a better study, the best data we have.
So mindless babble and pushing pseudoscience nuttery. And your whole case is built on nothing... 
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 10827
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:09 pm
Quote:OK, fine, they are empirical arguments, so maybe they are not logical arguments if we want to be extremely precise.
They aren't arguments at all simply mindless babble.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 10827
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:16 pm
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2023 at 4:23 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 15242
Threads: 116
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:22 pm
(January 28, 2023 at 11:26 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: (January 27, 2023 at 5:48 pm)brewer Wrote: Did you actually read/understand that this is a conspiracy site?
So what if somebody is posting conspiracy theory stuff there? Every claim needs to be analyzed independently. You don't get to dismiss every logical argument just because it is on a website that is also hosting conspiracy theory stuff. Besides, it seems to me that the term "conspiracy theory" has been applied to quite a lot of things that are not actual conspiracy theories, all in an effort to discredit them.
We have a thread for COVID conspiracy theories. You may find yourself there if you don't find a fact or two from a legitimate source.
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
Posts: 10827
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:25 pm
All he has is babble and nonesense
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 2020
Threads: 133
Joined: July 26, 2017
Reputation:
5
RE: Official live update of spread of COVID19
January 28, 2023 at 4:41 pm
(January 28, 2023 at 4:08 pm)Helios Wrote: Quote:I feel like you are trying to Gish-Gallop me. Of those 4 web-pages you linked me, only the last one even addresses the study the AMG News is talking about. The third one is not even talking about heart issues, it is talking about kidney issues.
The methodology of the 2 studies that the AMG News study is building upon may be different, but does that really account for the recent one giving 17 times larger result than the older one? 17 times? Really? Until you point to a better study, the AMG News study is the best data we have. If you think it's enough to complain about the flaws in methodology to discard a study, read up on conspiracy theorists (perhaps The Mad Revisionists - the conspiracy theorists who claim the Moon doesn't exist) and consider the matters again. You cannot manufacture the truth by discarding the evidence. That's not how science works. The study that AMG News is talking about is, until you point to a better study, the best data we have.
So mindless babble and pushing pseudoscience nuttery. And your whole case is built on nothing...
My case is built on an actual study, one cited by AMG News.
|
