(March 27, 2023 at 7:56 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:

Quote:Actually, no. Literally all I had to do to check is google “are children allowed in nudist resorts” (hopefully, this doesn't put me on a watchlist) and I found out that, as a rule, they are. I found one in California which didn’t, and this decision is controversial, especially among nudists.

Of course, the rest do seem to have provisos that children have to be supervised at all times (usually by their parents specifically), and that’s on top of the usual prohibitions on taking photos (some resorts allow photography but ONLY if anyone in the frame consents to having their picture taken, some forbid it altogether), which are extremely understandable and reasonable. And for an example, here’s one set of rules from a naturist resort in my home state.

They’re allowed in but they cannot be around the naked adults?  I wonder why that is if there is nothing wrong with naked adults being around kids?  You should look up the state laws on this matter.  Not sure why you’d be on a watchlist if there’s nothing wrong with all of this.

Yes, they can be around the naked adults. They're REQUIRED to be around naked adults. That's what I fucking said, and I just bolded the part where I said they did.

The thing about a watchlist is because, frankly, it's not normal to think about kids and nudity as much as you apparently seem to. Even nudists don't think about children and genitalia as much as you seem to.

(March 27, 2023 at 9:14 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(March 27, 2023 at 7:56 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: They’re allowed in but they cannot be around the naked adults?  I wonder why that is if there is nothing wrong with naked adults being around kids?  You should look up the state laws on this matter.  Not sure why you’d be on a watchlist if there’s nothing wrong with all of this.

Yes, they can be around the naked adults. They're REQUIRED to be around naked adults. That's what I fucking said, and I just bolded the part where I said they did.

The thing about a watchlist is because, frankly, it's not normal to think about kids and nudity as much as you apparently seem to. Even nudists don't think about children and genitalia as much as you seem to.

Oh stop, I am the one arguing that this is all wrong and criminal; you're the one fantasizing about kids being required to be around naked adults and reminiscing about the good old days at the YMCA.  Go take a cold shower creep.

Fantasizing? I'm countering your claim that something that is illegal when it patently isn't. Hell, I've mentioned before that nudist resorts (as a rule) are aggressively sexless, which is, frankly, the only reason it's generally considered okay for minors (if supervised) to attend. And, on that note, the whole goddam reason we're even talking about nudism to begin with is because you insisted that nudity is automatically sexual, that there's no moral (or legal) difference between catching a glimpse of someone's genitalia and them trying to show said genitalia to an unwilling participant (which is what indecent exposure is). And I pointed out several counter-examples to showcase how patently untrue that idea is.

(March 28, 2023 at 3:18 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: Fantasizing? I'm countering your claim that something that is illegal when it patently isn't. Hell, I've mentioned before that nudist resorts (as a rule) are aggressively sexless, which is, frankly, the only reason it's generally considered okay for minors (if supervised) to attend. And, on that note, the whole goddam reason we're even talking about nudism to begin with is because you insisted that nudity is automatically sexual, that there's no moral (or legal) difference between catching a glimpse of someone's genitalia and them trying to show said genitalia to an unwilling participant (which is what indecent exposure is). And I pointed out several counter-examples to showcase how patently untrue that idea is.

We've been to nude beaches more than once. Families there with kids. Nothing sexual about any of it (although the barbecuing looks uncomfortably risky. I'd recommend a picnic lunch.)

I can't imagine a naturist resort would be any different.

Boru

Quote:I'm sorry for you having cancer.
If it's comforting to you, I have M.S. It's miles away from cancer, but hey.

As for that comment, even without breasts a woman is a woman. There is no changing your gender; it is a gift from God.

This makes us discover the goal of this topic more and more: even if a man or a woman practiced sex as the opposite gender, it won't change the truth: it's a mere illusion

Sorry, the only illusions here are yours Winter like everything else you spew on this forum 

You think hell is a black hole and blame every problem on earth on the west and the United States.

That's some hefty illusions.

(March 28, 2023 at 4:40 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(March 28, 2023 at 3:18 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: Fantasizing? I'm countering your claim that something that is illegal when it patently isn't. Hell, I've mentioned before that nudist resorts (as a rule) are aggressively sexless, which is, frankly, the only reason it's generally considered okay for minors (if supervised) to attend. And, on that note, the whole goddam reason we're even talking about nudism to begin with is because you insisted that nudity is automatically sexual, that there's no moral (or legal) difference between catching a glimpse of someone's genitalia and them trying to show said genitalia to an unwilling participant (which is what indecent exposure is). And I pointed out several counter-examples to showcase how patently untrue that idea is.

We've been to nude beaches more than once. Families there with kids. Nothing sexual about any of it (although the barbecuing looks uncomfortably risky. I'd recommend a picnic lunch.)

I can't imagine a naturist resort would be any different.

Boru

So have I. It's not even a thing. Just don't be a creep and it's not an issue.

(March 27, 2023 at 7:27 pm)WinterHold Wrote:

(March 27, 2023 at 11:34 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Where is AreWeThereYet defend little girls being forced to see penises. I can't seem to find that post.

Here it is:

https://atheistforums.org/thread-64899-p...pid2140821

Quote:Arewethereyet:

March 25, 2023 at 5:39 pm (This post was last modified: March 25, 2023 at 5:40 pm by arewethereyet.)
Let's say that eight year olds are taking gang showers...what if one of them is starting to feel urges toward girls? How do we weed out the *gasp* future lesbians, bisexuals, gender fluids, etc. etc. etc? Hmmmm?

Surely you have thought this through since you are so concerned about the sexuality of others.

Oh, so it is a complete misrepresentation what they said. Not even one word about penises. Thanks!

(March 28, 2023 at 9:27 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:

(March 27, 2023 at 7:27 pm)WinterHold Wrote: Here it is:

https://atheistforums.org/thread-64899-p...pid2140821

Oh, so it is a complete misrepresentation what she said. Thanks!

Does he do anything else ?

(March 28, 2023 at 7:36 am)Helios Wrote:

(March 28, 2023 at 4:40 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: We've been to nude beaches more than once. Families there with kids. Nothing sexual about any of it (although the barbecuing looks uncomfortably risky. I'd recommend a picnic lunch.)

I can't imagine a naturist resort would be any different.

Boru

So have I. It's not even a thing. Just don't be a creep and it's not an issue.

My only objection to public nudity is that it’s proof that some people wear clothes. *shudder*

Boru

Edit: Except Valk. Valk should go ‘round naked ALL the time.

(March 28, 2023 at 11:51 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(March 28, 2023 at 7:36 am)Helios Wrote: So have I. It's not even a thing. Just don't be a creep and it's not an issue.

My only objection to public nudity is that it’s proof that some people wear clothes. *shudder*

Boru

Edit: Except Valk. Valk should go ‘round naked ALL the time.

True