Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 5:21 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
#11
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 3:43 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Do I really need to explain that?

What do you mean? I am arguing that consciousness being the product of the brain is a lot better explanation than souls being timeless. Don't you agree?
Reply
#12
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 3:48 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 11:10 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’m not at all convinced that the Greek words matter. If you had expressed the same notion without referencing Greek, your argument would stand or fall on other issues.

Boru

Well, sometimes the language does matter when discussing philosophy. Croatian, for example, has the same word for "belief" and "faith", and it is annoying to explain people that those are not the same thing. The guy who rode the airplane in 9/11 attack presumably believed in heaven, but most people don't, most people just have faith that heaven is real.

It sometimes does, it sometimes doesn’t. In your soul argument, I can’t see how it does.

What is the difference between believing that something exists and having faith that it exists?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#13
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 3:50 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 3:43 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Do I really need to explain that?

What do you mean? I am arguing that consciousness being the product of the brain is a lot better explanation than souls being timeless. Don't you agree?

A better explanation for what? I’m not being flippant, I don’t understand what you’re driving at.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#14
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 3:55 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 3:50 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: What do you mean? I am arguing that consciousness being the product of the brain is a lot better explanation than souls being timeless. Don't you agree?

A better explanation for what? I’m not being flippant, I don’t understand what you’re driving at.

Boru

A better explanation for the fact that human beings who wake up from a coma have no idea how much time has passed.
Reply
#15
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 3:57 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 3:55 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: A better explanation for what? I’m not being flippant, I don’t understand what you’re driving at.

Boru

A better explanation for the fact that human beings who wake up from a coma have no idea how much time has passed.

What would that have to do with whether a soul or an afterlife exists? Who says souls have to keep track or time or impart memories?

This might make more sense if you started out by saying what you think a soul is and what qualities it would have.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#16
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 3:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 3:48 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: Well, sometimes the language does matter when discussing philosophy. Croatian, for example, has the same word for "belief" and "faith", and it is annoying to explain people that those are not the same thing. The guy who rode the airplane in 9/11 attack presumably believed in heaven, but most people don't, most people just have faith that heaven is real.

It sometimes does, it sometimes doesn’t. In your soul argument, I can’t see how it does.

What is the difference between believing that something exists and having faith that it exists?

Boru

I think most of the people don't really believe in heaven, that they would behave very differently if they believed in it. Why cry when somebody dear to you dies if it's only "goodbye for now", rather than "goodbye forever"?
Reply
#17
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 3:59 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 3:57 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: A better explanation for the fact that human beings who wake up from a coma have no idea how much time has passed.

What would that have to do with whether a soul or an afterlife exists? Who says souls have to keep track or time or impart memories?

This might make more sense if you started out by saying what you think a soul is and what qualities it would have.

Boru

A soul is some immaterial entity that is you. In order for something to be you, it needs to have your memories. That's how identity is defined in modern philosophy, as psychological continuity.

EDIT: And I think that, for something to be you, it needs to sense the passage of time, don't you think? You cannot be some timeless entity, a timeless entity would have a completely different experience than you have. Not to mention souls being timeless creates a bunch of problems: If souls are timeless, how it is that you cannot remember future events? How does a brain interact with a timeless soul?
Reply
#18
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 4:04 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 3:59 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: What would that have to do with whether a soul or an afterlife exists? Who says souls have to keep track or time or impart memories?

This might make more sense if you started out by saying what you think a soul is and what qualities it would have.

Boru

A soul is some immaterial entity that is you. In order for something to be you, it needs to have your memories. That's how identity is defined in modern philosophy, as psychological continuity.

EDIT: And I think that, for something to be you, it needs to sense the passage of time, don't you think? You cannot be some timeless entity, a timeless entity would have a completely different experience than you have. Not to mention souls being timeless creates a bunch of problems: If souls are timeless, how it is that you cannot remember future events? How does a brain interact with a timeless soul?

That’s a terribly bad definition. I am demonstrably not an immaterial entity, so how could an immaterial entity be me?

I thought identity was defined as the relation a thing bears to itself, which is not the same as psychological continuity.

I can’t address the rest of your post, since your definition of ‘soul’ seems untenable.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#19
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 4:00 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(June 18, 2023 at 3:51 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It sometimes does, it sometimes doesn’t. In your soul argument, I can’t see how it does.

What is the difference between believing that something exists and having faith that it exists?

Boru

I think most of the people don't really believe in heaven, that they would behave very differently if they believed in it. Why cry when somebody dear to you dies if it's only "goodbye for now", rather than "goodbye forever"?

Since that’s not even an attempt to answer my question, I’ll rephrase it: How do you differentiate faith from belief?

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#20
RE: Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy?
(June 18, 2023 at 11:10 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’m not at all convinced that the Greek words matter. If you had expressed the same notion without referencing Greek, your argument would stand or fall on other issues.

Boru



Pretending great wisdom lies in the words from language that one is betting one’s interlocutors to not be fluent in matters a lot, it matters to the tune of being the bedrock of entire epistemologies, just ask Belaqua or neo.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jesus on the Gospel, not any Christian Church, and the Afterlife KerimF 31 3060 May 17, 2023 at 9:13 am
Last Post: KerimF
  Your personal views on the Afterlife Mystic Monkey 31 20341 May 12, 2023 at 10:36 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 17412 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  I have made a new YouTube video about afterlife... FlatAssembler 32 3201 July 12, 2022 at 2:35 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 5204 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 23580 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What is the best counter argument against "What do you lose by believing?" Macoleco 25 2408 May 1, 2021 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  An afterlife would be terrifying for me SuicideCommando01 76 7882 January 6, 2021 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  My essay about afterlife in Latin FlatAssembler 2 668 December 28, 2020 at 1:10 pm
Last Post: brewer
  The Argument Against Evil-lution no one 19 4145 January 5, 2020 at 7:58 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)