Quote:If English is your second language, it's cool I get it - that's legitimately helps me understand where some of the confusion might be coming in.

It is but that's aside the point 

Quote:This statement implies, as it is written, that I am the one using the fallacy; if you are trying to make the statement that I am accusing others of it then it would be, "Again, why is it my job to define a fallacy you are accusing others of throwing around

Nah the way I wrote it is fine

So to sum up my earlier statement, hold arguing Trans Issues with a right-winger is futile as they don't have a clue what they are talking about. Just be content with the fact you are right and that future generations will treat them like Geocentrists or Vitalists

(Yesterday at 6:39 pm)TheWhiteMarten Wrote:

(Yesterday at 6:16 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: And I take it that we’re ignoring that this random Quora poster is an MD in Psychiatry and Neurology, and, oh, yeah, was actually there when they made the change?

Can you prove it?

Well, here's her LinkedIn page. That's sufficient enough for her degrees.

(Yesterday at 7:02 pm)The Architect Of Fate Wrote:

Quote:If English is your second language, it's cool I get it - that's legitimately helps me understand where some of the confusion might be coming in.

It is but that's aside the point 

Quote:This statement implies, as it is written, that I am the one using the fallacy; if you are trying to make the statement that I am accusing others of it then it would be, "Again, why is it my job to define a fallacy you are accusing others of throwing around

Nah the way I wrote it's fine

It's really not, because if you are approaching me from a position of ignorance (misunderstanding my position) then I don't need to assume you are coming from a position of arrogance or spite.

What you said was not "fine" unless your intention was to accuse me of using false dilemma arguments, and it's what I mean by a position of ignorance. 





 Adverb Phrase                        Noun                         Verb                     Noun                  Noun                               Phrasal Verb 
Again, why is it           my job            to define        a fallacy       you...          ...'re throwing around?



The first half of the sentence is in regard to yourself, leaving us with, "A fallacy you're throwing around."

Our verb is the phrase, "Throwing around" - from there we have to find who is throwing it ("you") and what it even is ("a fallacy.")

Quote:It's really not, because if you are approaching me from a position of ignorance (misunderstanding my position) then I don't need to assume you are coming from a position of arrogance or spite.

It really is, Nah no one approaches you from a position of ignorance all the ignorance is found in you (everyone understand your bullshit position ) Try again 

Quote:What you said was not "fine" unless your intention was to accuse me of using false dilemma arguments, and it's what I mean by a position of ignorance. 

Nah it was fine 

Quote:Adverb Phrase                        Noun                         Verb                     Noun                  Noun                               Phrasal Verb 
Again, why is it           my job            to define        a fallacy       you...          ...'re throwing around?



The first half of the sentence is in regard to yourself, leaving us with, "A fallacy you're throwing around."

Our verb is the phrase, "Throwing around" - from there we have to find who is throwing it ("you") and what it even is ("a fallacy.")

Nah what I wrote was fine

(Yesterday at 7:35 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(Yesterday at 6:39 pm)TheWhiteMarten Wrote: Can you prove it?

Well, here's her LinkedIn page. That's sufficient enough for her degrees.

Fair enough; to the best of my ability, I am not able to find any information about her being on the panels either - but as already stated, since she repeated what I said I'm not too hard pressed to find that information anyway.

I would just note that she doesn't have a degree in any hard sciences (philosophy and psychology) which makes me question why she would be referenced in regards to the biology of males and females... even if she confirms what I said about the DSM.

(Yesterday at 7:46 pm)The Architect Of Fate Wrote:

Quote:Adverb Phrase                        Noun                         Verb                     Noun                  Noun                               Phrasal Verb 
Again, why is it           my job            to define        a fallacy       you...          ...'re throwing around?



The first half of the sentence is in regard to yourself, leaving us with, "A fallacy you're throwing around."

Our verb is the phrase, "Throwing around" - from there we have to find who is throwing it ("you") and what it even is ("a fallacy.")

Nah what I wrote was fine

One day, *one day,* I'm going to get you to accidently let down your armor and actually justify a statement you make.

It's going to be wonderful and I'm gonna crack open a beer in celebration, so just known you are cheating me out of that if it gives you more motivation to play tough.

Quote:One day, *one day,* I'm going to get you to accidently let down your armor and actually justify a statement you make.

I have given you all justification you deserve sunshine your entitled to nothing else. 

Quote:It's going to be wonderful and I'm gonna crack open a beer in celebration, so just known you are cheating me out of that if it gives you more motivation to play tough.

I don't need to play tough I simply need to state what's so and watch you falter against it of course until you fall to same fate as all the others. I have been here almost a decade your not special just one more blip I whose name I won't even remember.

Also nothing Rye's source says agrees with your nonesense position and the person he cites is enough you fumble yet again 

(Yesterday at 6:39 pm)TheWhiteMarten Wrote: I allege that a certain type of man is dangerous in this situation - deviants, perverts, sexual assaulters - and that giving them legal protection to insert themselves into areas where women are at a high risk is not sound policy.

Oh, so that's your problem. Well, good news: policies that allow trans women into women's bathrooms won't actually give them legal protection to sexually assault women. For one thing, sexual assault, whether or not it happens in a restroom or not, is still illegal, and "I identify as a woman, so I belong in there sexually assaulting women" is simply not a defense anyone, even the most "woke" person will entertain. 

And, frankly, your unspoken assumption that someone inclined to sexually assault women would only find a way to do so if the law allowed certain penis-bearing people to do so, is false. This is the testimony of a woman who was actually assaulted in a women's restroom by a man. And the man didn't pretend to be a woman, and they didn't have gender-neutral or trans-friendly restrooms. They just had a clearly marked women's room and a man willing to just ignore that, barge in, and fulfill his depraved desires.