If nobody minds, I'll be taking a short break from this thread since I want to focus more on writing up my opening debate statements. I'll make my responses either over the weekend or early next week.

(January 26, 2012 at 5:38 pm)Tiberius Wrote: If nobody minds, I'll be taking a short break from this thread since I want to focus more on writing up my opening debate statements. I'll make my responses either over the weekend or early next week.

LOL, mine is ready to go bro... If you are correct, here is to hoping I am open minded enough to change my position.

(January 26, 2012 at 5:40 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: If you are correct, here is to hoping I am open minded enough to change my position.

Hear hear!

(January 26, 2012 at 5:01 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Adrian is driving down the road in alabama and gets in a car wreck. The closest hospital is 10 minutes away. Sadly for him, it is "non-whites only" and they flat out refuse to accept him as a patient for any reason. The closest hospital to accept him as a patient happens to be an hour away.

Rev, you scenario reminded me of this:

Quote:Oh, yeaah, how about that media? Lets just say the owner of a local newspaper is a white supremecist. He decides to be slick and not hang the "whites only" sign on his business, but the policy is definitely apparent in the way he runs his business. He hires a very small handfull of blacks, but makes sure the majority of his staff are populated by white supremecists or racists. he informs them not to be open and blunt about their racist mission and instead makes selective editing on stories to push his racist agenda, all the while seeming "inclusive" and NOT lying in the legal sense. Now we have the entire populace being influenced by a white power newspaper in the guise of a normal and "open minded" media.

I think you've just described Fox News.