(February 5, 2012 at 2:52 pm)Zakir_250 Wrote: He refuses to debate people.

Some people can't be taken seriously enough to be worth debating. Yourself included.

Who he debates is irrelivent, he's a scientist, not a professional debator like WLC.

Zakir, you have proven you have no scientific knowledge, are a particularly awful poster/apologist, have no idea about the real world and you have no argument, and lasty, the videos you have put up on here are awful and you're a seriously deluded fool, get an education and look elsewhere than Islamic sites for real knowledge.

TRY OBJECTIVITY FFS.

(February 5, 2012 at 3:14 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: Who he debates is irrelivent, he's a scientist, not a professional debator like WLC.

Zakir, you have proven you have no scientific knowledge, are a particularly awful poster/apologist, have no idea about the real world and you have no argument, and lasty, the videos you have put up on here are awful and you're a seriously deluded fool, get an education and look elsewhere than Islamic sites for real knowledge.

TRY OBJECTIVITY FFS.

Young girls just exposed him to what he is. I know some Atheists who think Dawkins isn't a good scientist.

(February 5, 2012 at 2:52 pm)Zakir_250 Wrote: Like I said, he is a very reliable source. More reliable than Richard DORKins

Jesus fucking christ, you called Dawkins DORkins! I feel so insulted

(February 5, 2012 at 3:18 pm)LastPoet Wrote:

(February 5, 2012 at 2:52 pm)Zakir_250 Wrote: Like I said, he is a very reliable source. More reliable than Richard DORKins

Jesus fucking christ, you called Dawkins DORkins! I feel so insulted

So?

Richard Dawkins is a peer-reviewed scientist and popular author with many best-selling publications to his name. Hamza Tzortzis and William Lane "Two Citations" Craig are mass debating preachers who appeal to the lowest common denominator. I know who I'd trust as a source of information.

(February 5, 2012 at 3:19 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Richard Dawkins is a peer-reviewed scientist and popular author with many best-selling publications to his name. Hamza Tzortzis and William Lane "Two Citations" Craig are mass debating preachers who appeal to the lowest common denominator. I know who I'd trust as a source of information.

But what about the video I posted where younger girls knew more about Science than him?

(February 5, 2012 at 3:17 pm)Zakir_250 Wrote: I know some Atheists who think Dawkins isn't a good scientist.

Then they don't know what they are talking about. He may, arguably, not be the best debater but he certainly is a very fine scientist.

However, I'm sure that many consider you as a masterdebater

(February 5, 2012 at 3:17 pm)Zakir_250 Wrote: Young girls just exposed him to what he is.

Better than exposing them to muhammad, you know, your paedo prophet

Quote: I know some Atheists who think Dawkins isn't a good scientist.

Some might do, but I don't like Dawkins when he speaks about atheist stuff. As a biologist he has the skills, something you do not

He was, before he retired, the top biologist at one of the top 5 universities in the world, has a Phd in Zoology, has written peer reviewed papers, authored pop-science books, taught at UC Berkeley.

You think a young girl knows more about science than Dawkins does.

---

FWIW i'm going with stupid.