RE: Disturbed Theist Calls The Atheist Experience
February 12, 2012 at 1:10 pm
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2012 at 1:14 pm by Rokcet Scientist.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 23, 2025, 5:19 pm
Thread Rating:
Disturbed Theist Calls The Atheist Experience
|
No, she said she got pregnant from watching porn. That is stupid, but it is not a rape accusation.
RE: Disturbed Theist Calls The Atheist Experience
February 12, 2012 at 1:18 pm
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2012 at 1:43 pm by Rokcet Scientist.)
No, that's using 'rape' as an explanation, not as an accusation (for a change).
Because she can hardly haul a 3D digital pornstar who was on the other side of the country and doesn't even know this woman into court, can she? But hey, as long as hubby and the in-laws are stupid enough to buy this cock and bull story her bread is still buttered. And that's apparently all that's important to the lady. Even at the expense of being judged totally bonkers and absurd – or of course simply a bald-faced liar – by the rest of the world. This is an excellent example of how far some women will go to deny the obvious. And this one time it is funny too (if you ignore the cheated husband for a minute).
This whole discussion is getting absolutely ridiculous.
(February 12, 2012 at 1:18 pm)Rokcet Scientist Wrote: No, that's using 'rape' as an explanation, not as an accusation (for a change). She said she got pregnant from watching a porn, not that the porn star raped her. There is a difference. It's kind of like Jesus' mother. She didn't say god raped her. RE: Disturbed Theist Calls The Atheist Experience
February 12, 2012 at 1:47 pm
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2012 at 1:51 pm by Rokcet Scientist.)
SHE GOT INVOLUNTARILY IMPREGNATED (she claims). That is the definition of RAPE, my friend. What part of that don't you understand? Even if she did not use the word 'rape', she most certainly implied it as strongly as possible. So strongly that she was even prepared to go public with it.
What is it with you guys around here? She is not implying anyone raped her. She is saying that watching a porn got her pregnant. What part of that do you not understand? If I said reading a book got me pregnant would I be implying rape?
Nowhere does it mention that the porn watching was involuntary. Thus, not about rape.
RE: Disturbed Theist Calls The Atheist Experience
February 12, 2012 at 1:54 pm
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2012 at 1:57 pm by Rokcet Scientist.)
(February 12, 2012 at 1:50 pm)Shell B Wrote: What is it with you guys around here? She is not implying anyone raped her. She is saying that watching a porn got her pregnant. What part of that do you not understand? If I said reading a book got me pregnant would I be implying rape? Yes, if you claimed it happened involuntarily, without your consent, then you would be implying RAPE as the law defines it.
I disagree. There has to be sex for it to be rape. She is claiming that watching the porn got her pregnant, not having involuntary sex with someone.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)