Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
[split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 25, 2012 at 10:18 pm
Quote:Oh for fuck sake, you condemned him? Really? You let certain people who will remain nameless get away with murder and you condemn *this* guy?
Nah, since you're going to bitch, why not go ahead and name them? I'll try to ignore that fact that you and I both know you are not privy to all the reports and such that we get and have no basis for comparison.
Posts: 7031
Threads: 250
Joined: March 4, 2011
Reputation:
78
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 25, 2012 at 10:57 pm
I definitely want to see this list of people that I have let get away with murder
???
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 26, 2012 at 6:15 am
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2012 at 6:16 am by Reforged.)
(May 25, 2012 at 10:18 pm)Shell B Wrote: Quote:Oh for fuck sake, you condemned him? Really? You let certain people who will remain nameless get away with murder and you condemn *this* guy?
Nah, since you're going to bitch, why not go ahead and name them? I'll try to ignore that fact that you and I both know you are not privy to all the reports and such that we get and have no basis for comparison.
Was only thinking of one actually and I'll try to ignore the fact in the case I'm refering to you obviously didn't do your job properly, leapt to a snap conclusion, went to ego-con five and made no attempt to read through his posts which were even laid out before you so you didn't have to do any work whatsoever but whatever.
Care to guess which one I'm thinking of? Its not hard really. :-)
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 12512
Threads: 202
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
107
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 26, 2012 at 6:39 am
(May 26, 2012 at 6:15 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: (May 25, 2012 at 10:18 pm)Shell B Wrote: Nah, since you're going to bitch, why not go ahead and name them? I'll try to ignore that fact that you and I both know you are not privy to all the reports and such that we get and have no basis for comparison.
Was only thinking of one actually and I'll try to ignore the fact in the case I'm refering to you obviously didn't do your job properly, leapt to a snap conclusion, went to ego-con five and made no attempt to read through his posts which were even laid out before you so you didn't have to do any work whatsoever but whatever.
Care to guess which one I'm thinking of? Its not hard really. :-)
Geezzz! Not me I hope Raph!
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 26, 2012 at 6:44 am
(May 26, 2012 at 6:39 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: (May 26, 2012 at 6:15 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Was only thinking of one actually and I'll try to ignore the fact in the case I'm refering to you obviously didn't do your job properly, leapt to a snap conclusion, went to ego-con five and made no attempt to read through his posts which were even laid out before you so you didn't have to do any work whatsoever but whatever.
Care to guess which one I'm thinking of? Its not hard really. :-)
Geezzz! Not me I hope Raph! ![Big Grin Big Grin](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Ha ha, no. Not you. :-)
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 12512
Threads: 202
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
107
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 26, 2012 at 9:47 am
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 26, 2012 at 11:08 am
(May 26, 2012 at 6:15 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Was only thinking of one actually and I'll try to ignore the fact in the case I'm refering to you obviously didn't do your job properly, leapt to a snap conclusion, went to ego-con five and made no attempt to read through his posts which were even laid out before you so you didn't have to do any work whatsoever but whatever.
Care to guess which one I'm thinking of? Its not hard really. :-)
Really? Go ahead and explain to me the case. Because, if I hadn't done my job properly, the rest of the staff would have amended my actions. Furthermore, I never take actions without discussion with the rest of the staff. Therefore, if you don't think it was handled properly, the entire staff is behind it. Thanks for thinking this is a dictatorship, though. I should also point out that I did not Gauntlet Phil. I actually said I wouldn't take any action since I was involved in the discussion and asked the rest of the staff to make the decision. I know, so ego-con.
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
142
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 26, 2012 at 12:14 pm
Shell had nothing to do with this, and shame on you for thinking this is somehow about her "ego". Phil's attitude has been reported many many times, and we (note: WE, the staff) have warned him multiple times about it. He continually disregards these warnings, hence why I (note: ME, Tiberius, not Shell or anyone else) sent him to the Gauntlet.
Perhaps you should enquire about things you clearly have no idea about before making up such ridiculous accusations in a public arena?
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 30, 2012 at 4:12 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2012 at 4:26 pm by Reforged.)
(May 26, 2012 at 11:08 am)Shell B Wrote: (May 26, 2012 at 6:15 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Was only thinking of one actually and I'll try to ignore the fact in the case I'm refering to you obviously didn't do your job properly, leapt to a snap conclusion, went to ego-con five and made no attempt to read through his posts which were even laid out before you so you didn't have to do any work whatsoever but whatever.
Care to guess which one I'm thinking of? Its not hard really. :-)
Really? Go ahead and explain to me the case. Because, if I hadn't done my job properly, the rest of the staff would have amended my actions. Furthermore, I never take actions without discussion with the rest of the staff. Therefore, if you don't think it was handled properly, the entire staff is behind it. Thanks for thinking this is a dictatorship, though. I should also point out that I did not Gauntlet Phil. I actually said I wouldn't take any action since I was involved in the discussion and asked the rest of the staff to make the decision. I know, so ego-con.
Didn't get the Mehmet thread reference I take it? No-one got that? No? Would you care to take me step by step through what aided your decision in ignoring the constant attempts of one person to force arguements on whos the better nation and/or race on as many threads as he could in a forum concerned with matters of theism and atheism? Even if the thread creator was wrong did that give you licence to ignore an issue that was clearly present as well as any evidence in the form of posts pertaining to it?
Yet in this instance you were very quick to condemn. What made this guy so much worse?
(May 26, 2012 at 12:14 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Shell had nothing to do with this, and shame on you for thinking this is somehow about her "ego". Phil's attitude has been reported many many times, and we (note: WE, the staff) have warned him multiple times about it. He continually disregards these warnings, hence why I (note: ME, Tiberius, not Shell or anyone else) sent him to the Gauntlet.
Perhaps you should enquire about things you clearly have no idea about before making up such ridiculous accusations in a public arena?
Ironic, you obviously have no idea what I'm referencing either. Maybe you should look into it.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 30, 2012 at 4:25 pm
Mehmet's posts about nationalistic tripe do not break the rules, so there is no 'clearly present' issue as you put it. If you feel he is being atagonistic, feel free to report him, but people are allowed to spout their political views, even if they are unpopular. Just because the site is called 'Atheist Forums' does not mean that certain topics are off limits.
FYI, mehmet does get warned when he breaks the rules, but it happens behind the scenes. Actually, a lot happens behind the scenes, including the event that you seem to be throwing a fit over, so how about you admit that you don't have all the information and should probably not be commenting on these issues from such a position of ignorance.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
|