You guys still playing chess with this pigeon?
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
Muhammad the Greatest: A Comparative Study
|
You guys still playing chess with this pigeon?
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
(December 9, 2012 at 7:16 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: Wow, just wow you could not do it today as people are too smart/in to their current believes for a new major religion to crop up, as science is slowly debunking everything, but back then I could have told them anything as long as it made 'logical' sense for that time. Today I would destroyed as a fake by the scientific community but it did not exist then. And the internet would also destroy and bullshit I sent I might get a small following but everybody else would have called bullshit. Response: Your rebuttals are becoming sadder and sadder. For your claims that it can't be done today because people are too smart/in to their current believes for a new major religion to crop up...is backed by nothing. Debunked again. Meanwhile, the qur'an challenge roves that the qur'an is the true word of Allah, as the qur'an challenge provides a hands on-eyewitness account that inspiring enough followers to conquer a nation, or just the street you live on, by using human-made speech/literature that goes against what the people want is humanly impossible, because anyone who takes the challenge will fail and not come close to answering it. And since it is clearly humanly impossible to use human-made speech/literature to achieve the act, then that means that the Qur'an that Muhammad used to inspire enough followers to conquer a nation was not the invention of any human/s, but from one who has greater power and authority than humans, and that is Allah. Debunked as usual.
What if Mo was an alien using advanced technology to trick people? Or maybe he was Satan of the Christian religion? Or maybe he was time traveller from the future?
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence." -- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103). (December 9, 2012 at 7:24 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote: Response: Your rebuttals are becoming sadder and sadder. For your claims that it can't be done today because people are too smart/in to their current believes for a new major religion to crop up...is backed by nothing. Debunked again. (December 9, 2012 at 7:24 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote:(December 9, 2012 at 7:16 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: Wow, just wow you could not do it today as people are too smart/in to their current believes for a new major religion to crop up, as science is slowly debunking everything, but back then I could have told them anything as long as it made 'logical' sense for that time. Today I would destroyed as a fake by the scientific community but it did not exist then. And the internet would also destroy and bullshit I sent I might get a small following but everybody else would have called bullshit. Way to shift the burden of proof. 1. Make unsubstantiated claim. 2. Offer the claim as proof. 3. Challenge others to disprove it. 4. Claim victory. Way to go! (December 9, 2012 at 7:35 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote:(December 9, 2012 at 7:32 pm)Dee Dee Ramone Wrote: Sure Al. Your prophet is an insider in childishness right? You are a fundamentalist. It's therefore necessary to ridiculize your ideas, because they are dangerous. And besides, allah is imiginary anyway. So let's call stupidity by it's name; Muhammed.
And I thought Christians were stubborn. Have you ever thought the REASON why he was able to 'conquer' a nation was because he was made up precisely for that purpose, a Muslim Hercules or Achilles, and people just believed whatever they were told about him?
As for your Rebuttals there are repetitive, please think of something original. If you Mohammed cam today to me with his massage, I would point him to the nearest mental heath clinic.
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful" - Edward Gibbon (Offen misattributed to Lucius Annaeus Seneca or Seneca the Younger) (Thanks to apophenia for the correction)
'I am driven by two main philosophies: Know more about the world than I knew yesterday and lessen the suffering of others. You'd be surprised how far that gets you' - Neil deGrasse Tyson "Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain (December 9, 2012 at 7:37 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Way to shift the burden of proof. Response: Way to shift the burden of proof and pretend as if you didn't. Ask for proof of something. Proof that can be tested and verified is presented Start to complain because you don't like the idea that by testing the evidence as required, it debunks your claim Use a strawman that the burden of proof has been shifted Way to go (December 9, 2012 at 7:46 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote:(December 9, 2012 at 7:37 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Way to shift the burden of proof. Begging the question, Al. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|