Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 7, 2013 at 6:25 pm
(January 7, 2013 at 5:55 pm)HalcyonicTrust Wrote: THE MAMMOTH TOUGHNESS SPELL IS FAR SUPERIOR!! TRUST ME ON THAT!!
Well, which one is 'superior' is up to the person... but mammoth's toughness would matter only if someone was attacking him with a boulder of infinite damage +1. Honestly, for moving the rock of immovability +3, bull's strength is more effective at every level.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 7, 2013 at 6:33 pm
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2013 at 6:33 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
K. Let's just leave it at "it's up to the person" 
I was being subjective anyway by the way 
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 7, 2013 at 6:47 pm
(January 7, 2013 at 6:33 pm)HalcyonicTrust Wrote: K. Let's just leave it at "it's up to the person"
I was being subjective anyway by the way
You're always being subjective, everything is. You know that.
It remains that, mathematically, your chances of survival or lifting would be better fitted to spells designed for the task.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 2254
Threads: 85
Joined: January 24, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 7, 2013 at 6:50 pm
(January 5, 2013 at 3:31 pm)Tiberius Wrote: "Can God make a rock so heavy he cannot lift it?" is a loaded question, and a logical fallacy.
At the very most, it only denies an absolutist version of omnipotence that almost nobody believes in in the first place. The question could really be asked this way: "Can God make square circles?". Most theists I've talked to believe in a version of omnipotence in which God can perform every action that is logically possible. The question is as rubbish as "Can God make square circles?" but the semantics behind it is valid, as its actually all originating from the omnipotence paradox. Then we start going down this whole "Types of omnipotence" bullshit. You're either all-powerful, or you're not, there is no "in-between".
For this reason the "omni" labels are self-defeating, self-contradictory terms that carry way too much baggage and should be prohibited from modern use.
(January 5, 2013 at 3:40 pm)Psykhronic Wrote: This. God still acts in accordance to his laws and reality, and also cannot make someone/thing greater than himself since he is the greatest. Which is not all-powerful. A magical all-powerful genie should be able to create another genie who's more powerful than the original. If the genie is bound by reality, by the laws of logic and physics, then its not all-powerful, just merely a powerful genie.
Omnipotence is a frigging useless word.
And, actually this thread can go fuck itself for all I care. I fucking hate arguing over arbitrary labels and semantics. >.>
Posts: 1272
Threads: 3
Joined: July 29, 2012
Reputation:
7
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 7, 2013 at 9:05 pm
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2013 at 9:08 pm by Lion IRC.)
Superlative terms like Omnipotent and Maximal Being etc are very important if you are ranking beings for the purpose of a discussion about deities.
That is what atheists here are doing right? Telling us foolish theists all about the way things are. (Preachy, atheist counter-apologetics.)
How can atheists disbelieve in a certain type of Being if they cant even get their head around the concept of a Higher Being that can do unbelievably omnipotent stuff?
2 fingers + 2 fingers = 7
(for extremely large values of 2)
![[Image: bruce-almighty.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=witneyman.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F06%2Fbruce-almighty.jpg)
Bruce Almighty. 2003 Movie
Posts: 67141
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 7, 2013 at 9:21 pm
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2013 at 9:23 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
The Gospel of Bruce, well, I suppose that's an upgrade from the bible, so, have at it.
Tibs....tiiiiiiiibs...see what happens when you try to make the whole thing sound a little less idiotic? Someone comes along and says "no no- I worship the nut-god, you've got him all wrong, all this sane bullshit"
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 5598
Threads: 112
Joined: July 16, 2012
Reputation:
74
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 7, 2013 at 10:06 pm
Quote:How can atheists disbelieve in a certain type of Being if they cant even get their head around the concept of a Higher Being that can do unbelievably omnipotent stuff?
Because it's fucking nonsense.
Posts: 1272
Threads: 3
Joined: July 29, 2012
Reputation:
7
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 8, 2013 at 1:59 am
(January 7, 2013 at 10:06 pm)Ryantology Wrote: Quote:How can atheists disbelieve in a certain type of Being if they cant even get their head around the concept of a Higher Being that can do unbelievably omnipotent stuff?
Because it's fucking nonsense.
Preachy, atheist counter-apologetics.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 8, 2013 at 7:33 am
Quote:For this reason the "omni" labels are self-defeating, self-contradictory terms that carry way too much baggage and should be prohibited from modern use.
BINGO!
The only way this concept as a claim works is because the person has already swallowed "He can do what he wants". Well yea, it does work when you let your brains fall out. But not only modern use of the word, but any use, because the myths of the past were not true even back then.
The Omni god claims have so much baggage no passenger airline would let them on board.
Posts: 2254
Threads: 85
Joined: January 24, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: The rock God can't lift.
January 8, 2013 at 2:56 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2013 at 2:57 pm by Welsh cake.)
(January 7, 2013 at 9:05 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: That is what atheists here are doing right? Telling us foolish theists all about the way things are. (Preachy, atheist counter-apologetics.) I can't tell if you're being satirical or not.
The purpose of apologetics is to defend a position. Atheism is technically not a position, it makes no claims, its not a world-view, there's nothing to defend, it barely qualifies as an "ism".
|
