Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 9:27 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The logical consequences of omnipotence
Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 21, 2013 at 10:16 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Where, exactly, have I contradicted myself?

You haven't contradicted yourself. By your own words, you state that God is at odds with your definition. And I have shown you how your definition is wrong.

Take a moment to address my argument instead of continually addressing your own.
Reply
Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 22, 2013 at 12:52 am)Celi Wrote: How could the ideal human world not be something that humans would want?

Humans want salt sugar and fat, yet a McDonald's diet of exactly that will kill you.

Human success, as seen in the 1st world, produces epidemics of suicide, obesity, etc. This is natures means of restoring balance.

Scientists have stated that life on earth could never have begun without the natural processes of tectonic activity.

Nature is good. That is the big picture, given my world view. Given your world view (sans God), it's all a bit hopeless.
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 22, 2013 at 5:01 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Nature is good. That is the big picture, given my world view. Given your world view (sans God), it's all a bit hopeless.
Why hopeless?
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 22, 2013 at 5:01 am)fr0d0 Wrote:
(January 22, 2013 at 12:52 am)Celi Wrote: How could the ideal human world not be something that humans would want?

Humans want salt sugar and fat, yet a McDonald's diet of exactly that will kill you.

Human success, as seen in the 1st world, produces epidemics of suicide, obesity, etc. This is natures means of restoring balance.

Scientists have stated that life on earth could never have begun without the natural processes of tectonic activity.

Nature is good. That is the big picture, given my world view. Given your world view (sans God), it's all a bit hopeless.
You know next to nothing about my worldview. Atheism isn't a worldview, and neither is it synonymous with nihilism. I don't think nature is bad.

More on topic: why the hell would God set the world up like that? Why would he use "epidemics of suicide and obesity" to pilot his well-oiled machine? If the world was set up with the good of humans specifically in mind, a horrible thing like suicide wouldn't exist, or, if it did, it wouldn't be what the universe's manager intentionally used for any reason.

I can totally understand how some aspects of the universe could suggest that an intelligent mind was behind them, but I certainly don't see how anyone could come to the conclusion that the universe was created and is maintained by someone who wants what's best for the human race. That's what Satan is for in Christianity: a scapegoat for the imperfection of the world.
Reply
Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 22, 2013 at 11:05 am)pocaracas Wrote: Why hopeless?

Purpose + meaning = hope

Without those there is no hope. Some if not most atheists don't see that as a bad thing.
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
Atheism doesn't prevent one's own life from having purpose and meaning.

If anything, it is more meaningful and purposeful to be atheist, because as a theist, your purpose is a meaningless fraud. You're wasting your life because your stupid faith tells you that there's an afterlife and it's more important that the one you're living now. Rest assured, I make no such mistake.

It does mean that human life, as a whole, has no meaning or purpose. But who the fuck cares? We do fine without it, and the illusion of it does you no good.
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 22, 2013 at 4:05 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(January 22, 2013 at 11:05 am)pocaracas Wrote: Why hopeless?

Purpose + meaning = hope

Without those there is no hope. Some if not most atheists don't see that as a bad thing.

The universe doesn't owe us a sense of hope. Plus, that equation makes no sense. Hope is the feeling of expectation and desire for something to happen or present itself. It can also be used to mean a feeling of trust, or be a grounds for believing that something good may happen.
Purpose + meaning = purpose and meaning.
Or perhaps you're talking about an entirely different, made up concept and are just using the word "hope" as a carrier for your new meaning.

Besides, we Atheists create our own sense purpose to achieve a sense of fulfilment, and our life has all the more meaning to it, as we know it's the only one we're gonna get, so we try to live it out to the best we can.

To be honest, I don't see why our existence must have a meaning or purpose. You're alive right now, so why not get the most out of it, instead of worshipping and running in circles, being directed by the invisible, non-tangible sky man, who seems to be playing an awfully long game of hide and seek with humanity. Get real man, your world view is no fun at all. It sucks dry the joys of life by imposing useless rules and regulations which only serve to constrict your already limited existence.
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
Hope for something is a subjective experience of a type of subjective purpose.... a sense of at least subjective meaning of one's own consciousness is required if not to experience this, then at least to enhance it.
Reply
Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
(January 22, 2013 at 11:26 am)Celi Wrote: You know next to nothing about my worldview.
All I said about your world view was that it was sans God. That's all I needed to say to make the generalisation. I accept that there may be exceptions.
Reply
RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
In other words, you were careful to cover yourself because this shit is complicated Wink
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Hate the sin, not the sinner" is such a logical fallacy Woah0 7 1275 September 7, 2022 at 4:24 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  The absurd need for logical proofs for God R00tKiT 225 21416 December 31, 2020 at 7:48 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Logical proof that God doesnt exist. Macoleco 5 2861 November 24, 2016 at 2:47 am
Last Post: ProgrammingGodJordan
  More insight into religion: logical and emotional beliefs robvalue 22 4145 August 16, 2016 at 10:13 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Atheists Have the Most Logical Reason for being Moral Rhondazvous 24 8129 January 22, 2016 at 6:49 pm
Last Post: Reforged
  Why logical arguments for Messengers don't work. Mystic 45 12748 January 6, 2016 at 2:40 am
Last Post: robvalue
  What logical fallacies are William Lane Craig's favorite? Lemonvariable72 19 8409 November 5, 2013 at 10:58 pm
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  the logical fallacies of religion and false arguments Nightfoot92 5 4330 September 15, 2013 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: Walking Void
  Top Logical Fallacies Used By Religion Meylis Delano Lawrence 12 7697 July 21, 2013 at 11:41 pm
Last Post: Michael Schubert
  Religions and Prayer, The Scientific Method, and Logical Holes Michael Schubert 2 2122 July 17, 2013 at 3:17 pm
Last Post: Michael Schubert



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)