Violet, this isnt about genderoperations and the changing of a persons sexuality.



It´s about cutting of a minors balls and thereby destroying his potential future sexuality before he even has the chance to develope one.

(February 4, 2013 at 8:29 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: It´s about cutting of a minors balls and thereby destroying his potential future sexuality before he even has the chance to develope one.

Right, and the debate has shifted into the realm of "Does a person of this particular age have the cognition to give consent to this particular act?"

(February 4, 2013 at 8:29 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: Violet, this isnt about genderoperations and the changing of a persons sexuality.

It´s about cutting of a minors balls and thereby destroying his potential future sexuality before he even has the chance to develope one.

As far as it was stated by several people: it involves a minor's ability to decide what they are, arbitrarily marking 'a person who wants their dick off' as not one of the things they were capable of declaring. That they were (and are) UNABLE to consent to such actions.

I agree with not doing these things until puberty, but that's because I would want the person to experience (for a small while) what it is that they are wanting rid of... only acting after their decision (and to be sure it very clearly is their decision).

But *regardless*, if castrating them fulfills the goal they want to fill... I'd see that they get a chance to do so. After their sex drive activates is a preference of mine, but then: I'd also prefer they have sex before they say what they want with sex. Sometimes, reality comes by and shits on everything we believe

Mind... even before puberty, if they express *enough* interest in the subject for a long enough period of time: I'll let someone hang themself with their own decision. I don't have to agree with someone to stand aside... only to respect them.

(February 4, 2013 at 8:44 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: As far as it was stated by several people: it involves a minor's ability to decide what they are, arbitrarily marking 'a person who wants their dick off' as not one of the things they were capable of declaring. That they were (and are) UNABLE to consent to such actions.

I agree with not doing these things until puberty, but that's because I would want the person to experience (for a small while) what it is that they are wanting rid of... only acting after their decision (and to be sure it very clearly is their decision).

But *regardless*, if castrating them fulfills the goal they want to fill... I'd see that they get a chance to do so. After their sex drive activates is a preference of mine, but then: I'd also prefer they have sex before they say what they want with sex. Sometimes, reality comes by and shits on everything we believe

Mind... even before puberty, if they express *enough* interest in the subject for a long enough period of time: I'll let someone hang themself with their own decision. I don't have to agree with someone to stand aside... only to respect them.

Think about it:

"I don't have to agree with someone to stand aside... only to respect them."

Crash course in English: The first paragraph was stating what it was that others were stating in response to your confusion as to my response. Second came personal belief. Final paragraph: that I'm willing to partake in actions I do not agree with *if* I respect someone.

(February 4, 2013 at 8:58 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: Think about it:

"I don't have to agree with someone to stand aside... only to respect them."

Crash course in English: The first paragraph was stating what it was that others were stating in response to your confusion as to my response. Second came personal belief. Final paragraph: that I'm willing to partake in actions I do not agree with *if* I respect someone.

JESUS LILLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I`m a German!!! The kind of people who are known to simply walk into Mordor.

But what I cant do is perfectly read or write english. I mostly translate posts before I can understand them and then mostly misunderstand them.

And this:

Der erste Paragraf stand in der Behauptungdas Andere eine Antwort zu deiner Verwirrung gaben und zu meiner Antwort?!?!?!??????????1!

has no meaning.

Please, please, please,.... I have no Idea what your point is in this post because it makes absolutly no sence.

(February 4, 2013 at 9:03 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: I`m a German!!! The kind of people who are known to simply walk into Mordor.

Poland isn't exactly Mordor.

(February 4, 2013 at 9:03 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: And this:

Der erste Paragraf stand in der Behauptungdas Andere eine Antwort zu deiner Verwirrung gaben und zu meiner Antwort?!?!?!??????????1!

has no meaning.

Well, it doesn't mean anything to me either... I dont know German. My girlfriend might be some help to you here, she's taking German

Quote:Please, please, please,.... I have no Idea what your point is in this post because it makes absolutly no sence.

Rephased: I have beliefs, but they do not stand in the way of me allowing another to do as they believe... given my regard for them.

(February 4, 2013 at 9:10 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: [quote='The Germans are coming' pid='396341' dateline='1360026219']

Rephased: I have beliefs, but they do not stand in the way of me allowing another to do as they believe... given my regard for them.

So at first you state that such actions should not be undertaken on someone who hasnt jet reached puperty.

Then: this is nothing but a belief, and you dont sstand in the way of people who dont believe in that aslong as you like them????????


Am I right with this?

Cause it still makes no sence.

There is a set standerd but you ignore standards when you "like" people?

(February 4, 2013 at 9:13 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: So at first you state that such actions should not be undertaken on someone who hasnt jet reached puperty.

First: I reiterate what it was I was responding to.

Quote:Then: this is nothing but a belief, and you dont sstand in the way of people who dont believe in that aslong as you like them????????

Then, I state my personal belief, and I don't prevent people who believe differently from doing as they believe... if I respect them (enough).

It's quite different from liking people... I mean, I don't like that many people. But I respect a whole lot of people. I don't so much care what their belief is (until it's hurting others, see my responses to circumcision and parent-based decisions about their child's gender)... as I care how firmly they hold it. If they firmly hold a belief that hurts someone I care about: I'll fight back with hard with my own firm beliefs to drive me... if their belief can hurt only themselves: they can believe whatever they want, and I do not give a rat's ass

Quote:Am I right with this?

Cause it still makes no sence.

There is a set standerd but you ignore standards when you "like" people?

Well... I ALSO ignore standards when I like people, what can I say? It's a gooey tentacle monster... but it's so nice, and it knows *exactly* what I want