(February 13, 2013 at 7:46 am)Napoléon Wrote: I can't give any relationship advice because I've never had a relationship.

---

---

I know how you feel, man. I'm the same.

But that didn't stop me from giving relationship advice. Maybe it should have?
Oh well, people rated me up, so I'm guessing the advice didn't kill anyone.

I

(February 13, 2013 at 5:01 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: Fr0d0, I'm not the type of woman who is either, a. possessive, or b. looking for a backbone. I have one of my own, thanks. Actually, it's really interesting you would make that assumption.

Yeah that wasn't aimed at you, but at the mention of it in this conversation. Nothing wrong with femininity of any flavour.
Perhaps that's why you specifically didn't want theists in here: because of your own prejudices :p I bring no baggage. Don't assume.

(February 13, 2013 at 2:32 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I

(February 13, 2013 at 5:01 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: Fr0d0, I'm not the type of woman who is either, a. possessive, or b. looking for a backbone. I have one of my own, thanks. Actually, it's really interesting you would make that assumption.

Yeah that wasn't aimed at you, but at the mention of it in this conversation. Nothing wrong with femininity of any flavour.
Perhaps that's why you specifically didn't want theists in here: because of your own prejudices :p I bring no baggage. Don't assume.

Um, Fr0d0? This is what you said:

Quote:I think it's harder for women too. If you're that type of personality that looks for a mate to provide a backbone to a family, then possessiveness is a natural desire.

You said "women". If you had said "some women" it might be different, but since you were replying to a thread I started, I think it was pretty safe to assume you were directing it at me. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, though, and conclude you just didn't think it all of the way through.

(February 13, 2013 at 3:59 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: You said "women". If you had said "some women" it might be different, but since you were replying to a thread I started, I think it was pretty safe to assume you were directing it at me. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, though, and conclude you just didn't think it all of the way through.

Did you notice the bit where I said " if you're that type of personality"?
I guess if you did it didn't sink in. Are you blonde too? :p

Thinking doesn't seem to be your strong point huh? *hands rexbeccarox her atheist badge*

(February 13, 2013 at 8:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:

(February 13, 2013 at 3:59 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: You said "women". If you had said "some women" it might be different, but since you were replying to a thread I started, I think it was pretty safe to assume you were directing it at me. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, though, and conclude you just didn't think it all of the way through.

Did you notice the bit where I said " if you're that type of personality"?
I guess if you did it didn't sink in. Are you blonde too? :p

Thinking doesn't seem to be your strong point huh? *hands rexbeccarox her atheist badge*

*hands Fr0d0 his fuckhead badge*

You're an ass.

(February 14, 2013 at 12:28 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: *hands Fr0d0 his fuckhead badge*

You're an ass.

It made perfect sense to me.

Peeps getting irritated over so little these days

You can ever ever trust anyone you always have to gamble even if you believe in god or not, but it doesnt really sound like the guy you were with was untrustworthy just that he split up with you

trust? trust in what, and to trust with what? I know things about my ex and she knows things about me.
I know things about alot of people including other exgirlfriends.
I just fundermentaly respect the privacy of others and dont give away privat information or other.
And neighter did they.

I guess it depends on the characters one meets. But judging that character over his or her trustworthyness is something you will have to do yourself.
But dont bunker yourself in, drink liters of wine and eat pizza and cake for 4 months like I did.

(February 14, 2013 at 12:30 am)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:

(February 14, 2013 at 12:28 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: *hands Fr0d0 his fuckhead badge*

You're an ass.

It made perfect sense to me.

Peeps getting irritated over so little these days

Vae, EVERYTHING makes perfect sense to you, including things that don't make sense.

His reaction was REALLY not warranted. She wasn't insulting him, and there was no real actual reason to mention women with possessive natures since that has not actually come up at all so far by anyone. If you drop a non-sequitur regarding other people into a conversation, chances are higher that people are going to come to the conclusion that you're slipping up and letting it be known that you're coming to an unfounded conclusion about them.

His immediately-following insults don't do much to dispel that possibility at all, either. Quick, throw the personal-attack smokescreen before you're exposed! *gives Fr0d0 his Christian Debate Tactic Mastery medal* 'Ere ya go, buddy, it's well earned.

(February 14, 2013 at 1:43 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: Vae, EVERYTHING makes perfect sense to you, including things that don't make sense.

Actually, very little makes sense to me. People trying to be philosophical are usually spouting self-defeating nonsense, or saying ridiculous things.

Then, there are the things which do make sense... not that you'd understand.

Quote:His reaction was REALLY not warranted. She wasn't insulting him, and there was no real actual reason to mention women with possessive natures since that has not actually come up at all so far by anyone. If you drop a non-sequitur regarding other people into a conversation, chances are higher that people are going to come to the conclusion that you're slipping up and letting it be known that you're coming to an unfounded conclusion about them.

I swear, people see jokes and take it personally. Every damn time... how womanly

Boy, do you even know what a non-sequiter is? Everything he's said in this thread has followed... as demonstrated. QED, and all that shit.

Since when has possessiveness inherently become an insult?

Quote:His immediately-following insults don't do much to dispel that possibility at all, either. Quick, throw the personal-attack smokescreen before you're exposed! *gives Fr0d0 his Christian Debate Tactic Mastery medal* 'Ere ya go, buddy, it's well earned.

There's a difference between expressing humored ire and a smokescreen. The initial 'blanket' wasn't made with mindfullness paid to prefacing every statement ever made with 'some', 'a few', or otherwise <segmented> in hopes of not offending anyone.

My gods... people will go so far with a clearly unintentional blanket. It's like they haven't held a discusion before... quickly, let's tack on more random personal attacks in the same breath as we condemn the so-called ad-hominems used by another. That'll surely show 'em.