(February 16, 2013 at 12:29 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:

(February 16, 2013 at 9:24 am)Ryantology Wrote:

Don't forget to wear your tin foil hat.

I don't have one. Can I borrow yours?

(February 16, 2013 at 4:33 pm)A Theist Wrote:

(February 16, 2013 at 12:29 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Don't forget to wear your tin foil hat.

I don't have one. Can I borrow yours?

LOL! "I know you are but what am I".

I bet you thought that was a clever retort when you hit "post", didn't you?

Dude, I'm not the one who just got done posting that there's a gay mafia that successfully managed to intimidate the entire psychiatric community into falsely modifying the tome that literally is the most peer-reviewed and respected source in their profession!

Wear the tin foil hat with pride, dude, and stick a beanie propeller on the top. After what you've claimed, you can't possibly lose any more credibility.

(February 16, 2013 at 12:20 pm)A Theist Wrote: Regardless of the impact that bipedal walking has on our bodies, nature has provided that our bodies function to stand erect and to walk on two feet....it's still a natural function for us, unlike same gender sex, which is unnatural......

Nature has provided for sexual pleasure from anal sex, especially from males. And, anal sex done carefully and properly, between monogamous partners, does not carry a significant risk. Also, same-gender sex is not all anal. Women do anal penetration infrequently, and a significant percentage of gay men don't do it. In fact, regular anal sex appears to be something only a minority of gay men engage in.

But, whether it does carry risks or not is completely beside the point. Heterosexual sex carries risks of its own. Think about the rate of deaths for women during childbirth throughout human history (hell, even today), and tell me that the risks of anal sex are anywhere close to that. What's funny about that is that God intentionally made childbirth dangerous to women as Eve's punishment.

Your citation of the health risks is your attempt to justify an edict from God which cannot be justified in any other way than simple, stupid prejudice.

(February 16, 2013 at 5:48 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:

(February 16, 2013 at 4:33 pm)A Theist Wrote: I don't have one. Can I borrow yours?

LOL! "I know you are but what am I".

I bet you thought that was a clever retort when you hit "post", didn't you?

Dude, I'm not the one who just got done posting that there's a gay mafia that successfully managed to intimidate the entire psychiatric community into falsely modifying the tome that literally is the most peer-reviewed and respected source in their profession!

Wear the tin foil hat with pride, dude, and stick a beanie propeller on the top. After what you've claimed, you can't possibly lose any more credibility.

What gay mafia? Where did I say anything about a gay mafia?....I just posted the historical truth about how homosexuality was removed from the DSM list by the APA....during the '70's gay activists considered psychiatry to be the enemy incarnate..."'Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate. Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you." - gay activist, Frank Kameny, Gay Liberation Front.

From the book, 'Homosexuality and American Psychology'...

Quote:"Dr. Bayer documents the first attack by homosexual activists against the APA in 1970 when this organization held its convention in San Francisco. Homosexual activists decided to disrupt the conference by interrupting speakers and shouting down and ridiculing psychiatrists who viewed homosexuality as a mental disorder. In 1971, homosexual activist Frank Kameny
worked with the Gay Liberation Front collective to demonstrate against the APA’s convention. At the 1971 conference, Kameny grabbed the microphone and yelled, 'Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate. Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you.'"

I suppose that you have never stopped to consider that the APA was wrong to have included it in the first place.

You don't hate homosexuality because you believe it is a mental disorder, you believe it is a mental disorder because you hate homosexuals.

(February 17, 2013 at 7:45 am)Ryantology Wrote: I suppose that you have never stopped to consider that the APA was wrong to have included it in the first place.

You don't hate homosexuality because you believe it is a mental disorder, you believe it is a mental disorder because you hate homosexuals.

That's a lie. Just because I oppose the practice doesn't mean I hate homosexuals. Disagreeing with you doesn't make me a hater or a racist.

(February 17, 2013 at 8:40 am)A Theist Wrote:

(February 17, 2013 at 7:45 am)Ryantology Wrote: I suppose that you have never stopped to consider that the APA was wrong to have included it in the first place.

You don't hate homosexuality because you believe it is a mental disorder, you believe it is a mental disorder because you hate homosexuals.

That's a lie. Just because I oppose the practice doesn't mean I hate homosexuals. Disagreeing with you doesn't make me a hater or a racist.

And why do you oppose the practice?

(February 17, 2013 at 8:40 am)A Theist Wrote: That's a lie. Just because I oppose the practice doesn't mean I hate homosexuals.

Would you recognize that they should have equal rights to you in all ways, even though you oppose the practice?

Yeah, I'm sure that's how it happened.

"Oh no, please don't yell at us. We'll completely rewrite the most internationally respected and peer-reviewed source of information on mental health if you just stop yelling at us."

"What my colleague said. We're just so scared of you noisy protesters and are always ready to change our entire professional approach to mental health on the basis of people interrupting our conferences."

"Right, we're certain our other peers all over the world will feel the same way. We'll change how the entire field of psychiatry deals with homosexuality if you just please stop saying mean things about us."

Personally, I think my gay mafia story would be more credible. I was trying to help you out but whatever.

(February 17, 2013 at 11:39 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: Yeah, I'm sure that's how it happened.

"Oh no, please don't yell at us. We'll completely rewrite the most internationally respected and peer-reviewed source of information on mental health if you just stop yelling at us."

"What my colleague said. We're just so scared of you noisy protesters and are always ready to change our entire professional approach to mental health on the basis of people interrupting our conferences."

"Right, we're certain our other peers all over the world will feel the same way. We'll change how the entire field of psychiatry deals with homosexuality if you just please stop saying mean things about us."

Personally, I think my gay mafia story would be more credible. I was trying to help you out but whatever.

What are your thoughts on this,...During one of the APA conventions in the 1970's gay activist, Frank Kameny of the Gay Liberation Front, ran to the podium, grabbed the microphone and declared,.....
"'Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate. Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you."...would you agree or disagree with Frank Kameny that this 'internationally respected and peer-reviewed' group of professionals were 'waging a relentless war of extermination' against homosexuals?