Thought so.
You don't know if I have or not.
I do, however, know you're a troll.
You don't know if I have or not.
I do, however, know you're a troll.
![[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn569%2Fthesummerqueen%2FUntitled2_zpswaosccbr.png)
|
Why can't science detect angels and demons?
|
|
Thought so.
You don't know if I have or not. I do, however, know you're a troll. ![]()
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(February 19, 2013 at 11:27 pm)Brakeman Wrote: Christians of today are veering away from the angels and demons found in their storybook, not to mention even cockatrices. Why can't science detect these? Why haven't we found Cockatrice skeletons? Why can't science detect the demons inside people today that the church still yet exorcises? Actually - science CAN detect angels, devils, imps ogres, fairies, AND gods. THEY are proven to be human created characters if mostly ancient myth and legend. Ie - Fictions.
Who's to say mental health science hasn't detected angels and demons if those biblical characters are actually allegorical references for what primitive men did imagined was active in the personality of the human condition?
(February 19, 2013 at 11:27 pm)Brakeman Wrote: Christians of today are veering away from the angels and demons found in their storybook, not to mention even cockatrices. Why can't science detect these? Why haven't we found Cockatrice skeletons? Why can't science detect the demons inside people today that the church still yet exorcises?
Actually angels and demons have been detected. You can clearly hear them on some old record albums when played backward. Just don't do anything they tell you to as it is pretty hard to tell them apart.
Reminds me of a bit of Twitter advice that sometimes does the rounds: "If you play Coldplay backwards you'll hear a hidden message from Satan. Even worse, if you play it forward, you'll hear Coldplay."
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(February 19, 2013 at 11:27 pm)Brakeman Wrote: Christians of today are veering away from the angels and demons found in their storybook, not to mention even cockatrices. Why can't science detect these? Why haven't we found Cockatrice skeletons? Why can't science detect the demons inside people today that the church still yet exorcises? Science CAN detect demons and devils - as well as they can detect angels and gods. THEY are proven to be FICTIONAL beings created by humans for the tales of their religious myths and legends. They simply have no reality. (February 26, 2013 at 12:16 am)ThomM Wrote:(February 19, 2013 at 11:27 pm)Brakeman Wrote: Christians of today are veering away from the angels and demons found in their storybook, not to mention even cockatrices. Why can't science detect these? Why haven't we found Cockatrice skeletons? Why can't science detect the demons inside people today that the church still yet exorcises? You got it. RE: Why can't science detect angels and demons?
February 26, 2013 at 12:45 pm
(This post was last modified: February 26, 2013 at 12:52 pm by junkyardboy.)
"This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come.
Your link isn't actually a ringing endorsement of religion. And don't tell me what to do or say.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|