(March 2, 2013 at 3:35 am)Aractus Wrote:

(March 1, 2013 at 12:17 pm)Gabriel Syme Wrote: Ther would also be wider social benefits - HIV would essentially disappear in the west, for a start. (In western society, the disease affects gay men almost exclusively).

This is true... did you know that you need to have unprotected vaginal sex an average of 700 times with an HIV+ partner to contract HIV?

I'm afraid that is not actually true, it's a commonly held myth based on earlier studies. Whilst it is riskier for penile-anal sex to contract the disease, penile-vaginal sex can range from 1 per 1000 sexual acts to 1 in 3 sexual acts based on factors such as the stage oft he disease, circumcision, other present STI's, roughness of the acts, and a number of other things.

Saying it's a near purely gay disease wouldn't do anything to explain why Africa is having an epidemic. It's just residual nonsense from the 80's.

Why don't we prevent all kinds of sexuality, it causes all kinds of bother.

(February 27, 2013 at 9:13 am)earmuffs Wrote:

(February 27, 2013 at 5:11 am)Aractus Wrote: Well they should be prevented from marrying, and prevented from adopting children, so I suppose prevented from existence makes perfect sense.

So do you plan on defending your ignorant opinion or are you happy to just appear as a complete fucktard?

What? You haven't seen his bible? That's his reason and he is really such a good boy.

(March 1, 2013 at 6:07 am)Ryantology Wrote:

(March 1, 2013 at 5:47 am)A Theist Wrote: New research is disputing the so-called Gay Gene...

http://io9.com/5967426/scientists-confir...n-the-womb

I'm just wondering if you realize that this doesn't change the fact that sexuality is not a choice.

I realize that homosexuality defies physical biology and that our bodies are not constructed for same gender sex...the act is unnatural.

(March 2, 2013 at 11:57 am)A Theist Wrote:

(March 1, 2013 at 6:07 am)Ryantology Wrote: I'm just wondering if you realize that this doesn't change the fact that sexuality is not a choice.

I realize that homosexuality defies physical biology and that our bodies are not constructed for same gender sex...the act is unnatural.

Yet, it works, and occurs in nature, soo... actually it is natural.

It doesn't procreate, but it's a form of sex, and successful forms of sex fulfill biological needs of individuals that participate, and has positive effects on their physical health.

(March 2, 2013 at 11:57 am)A Theist Wrote: I realize that homosexuality defies physical biology and that our bodies are not constructed for same gender sex...the act is unnatural.

http://news.stanford.edu/pr/95/950310Arc5328.html

(March 2, 2013 at 11:57 am)A Theist Wrote: I realize that homosexuality defies physical biology and that our bodies are not constructed for same gender sex...the act is unnatural.

Argh, how do you people never seem to understand this?! Humans are natural too! Humans are developed from nature, we are natural; anything we do is natural! We are animals, just the same as the ones in the post above.

"Unnatural" as a concept is just magical thinking, really.

(March 2, 2013 at 12:04 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote:

(March 2, 2013 at 11:57 am)A Theist Wrote: I realize that homosexuality defies physical biology and that our bodies are not constructed for same gender sex...the act is unnatural.

---

http://news.stanford.edu/pr/95/950310Arc5328.html

---

Sorry Germ, that doesn't make it natural for animals either.

Which leads one to ask: what the fuck is your metric for what's natural?

And more importantly, why should we give a damn what you think is natural or not? Your opinions aren't the sole basis for reality, after all.

(March 2, 2013 at 12:16 pm)A Theist Wrote: Sorry Germ, that doesn't make it natural for animals either.

Yet the link I left explains why it is natural.

A research paper into the biological causes for homosexuality.