(March 7, 2013 at 6:10 am)i win you lose.com Wrote: What do you think allowed the conditions of consciousness to exist?

What precisely do you mean by that? Do you mean condition of consciousness - as in what allowed there to be conscious entities? Or do you mean conditions of consciousness - as in there are certain preconditions that need to be met for consciousness to exist and what allowed for those to exist?

(March 3, 2013 at 2:05 am)Minimalist Wrote: God is not very bright because the primitive men who invented him were not very bright.

Indeed, Why do you think they write a big book that says they are always drunk?

(March 7, 2013 at 6:15 am)genkaus Wrote:

(March 7, 2013 at 6:10 am)i win you lose.com Wrote: What do you think allowed the conditions of consciousness to exist?

What precisely do you mean by that? Do you mean condition of consciousness - as in what allowed there to be conscious entities? Or do you mean conditions of consciousness - as in there are certain preconditions that need to be met for consciousness to exist and what allowed for those to exist?

What allowed the conditions for consciousness to exist? Aka the observer

(March 7, 2013 at 4:39 pm)i win you lose.com Wrote:

(March 7, 2013 at 6:15 am)genkaus Wrote: What precisely do you mean by that? Do you mean condition of consciousness - as in what allowed there to be conscious entities? Or do you mean conditions of consciousness - as in there are certain preconditions that need to be met for consciousness to exist and what allowed for those to exist?

What allowed the conditions for consciousness to exist? Aka the observer

Repeating the statement does not answer my question.

Are we beating around the bush again?

(March 8, 2013 at 2:43 am)i win you lose.com Wrote: Are we beating around the bush again?

No. I'm asking you to clarify the question because without that I can't answer it.

(March 8, 2013 at 3:10 am)genkaus Wrote:

(March 8, 2013 at 2:43 am)i win you lose.com Wrote: Are we beating around the bush again?

No. I'm asking you to clarify the question because without that I can't answer it.

I rest my case 'i win you lose.com'




Apologies for jumping in here genkaus

(March 8, 2013 at 6:32 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:

(March 8, 2013 at 3:10 am)genkaus Wrote: No. I'm asking you to clarify the question because without that I can't answer it.

I rest my case 'i win you lose.com'




Apologies for jumping in here genkaus

Feel free...

(March 8, 2013 at 3:10 am)genkaus Wrote:

(March 8, 2013 at 2:43 am)i win you lose.com Wrote: Are we beating around the bush again?

No. I'm asking you to clarify the question because without that I can't answer it.

The more he "clarifies" for you, the more time is waisted... he could play your game with you all day long... but i think he just wants an answer