Time to die thread.

This one knows all the evidence that we can throw at him but has decided to live in denial.

I say let him.

This false belief is at his core now and now matter what evidence we show him he will come back with "but that could be falsified", "that woman could have been lying", "show me the DNA evidence" (from before the discovery of DNA).

No this is holocaust "flat earther".

Best to ignore him.

Oh man on man. I knew this guy was nutty based on his anti-Israel threads which are full of tripe and misinformation but it looks like he just took a turn to full retard. You need someone to define the holocaust for you? People don't want to argue with you because your position has no legitimacy and we have no wish to give you any. You are dug into your own neo-nazi position and if you don't believe in the holocaust I doubt the mountains of evidence are going to convince you.

(May 12, 2013 at 8:44 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: Oh man on man. I knew this guy was nutty based on his anti-Israel threads which are full of tripe and misinformation but it looks like he just took a turn to full retard. You need someone to define the holocaust for you? People don't want to argue with you because your position has no legitimacy and we have no wish to give you any. You are dug into your own neo-nazi position and if you don't believe in the holocaust I doubt the mountains of evidence are going to convince you.

The guy's brain is poisoned by his own neonazi propaganda...there's no sense arguing with, or entertaining this nazi troll...he's going to reject any and all evidence of a holocaust anyway...what's the point...let him drag his nazi ass back to Stormfront where he has a willing and listening audience full of other bigots and racists who'll drink his Kool Aid...

Predictable Bob is predictable...

(May 12, 2013 at 4:53 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Time to die thread.

This one knows all the evidence that we can throw at him but has decided to live in denial.

I say let him.

This false belief is at his core now and now matter what evidence we show him he will come back with "but that could be falsified", "that woman could have been lying", "show me the DNA evidence" (from before the discovery of DNA).

No this is holocaust "flat earther".

Best to ignore him.

How can anything be evidence for something no one can define? A real big non sequitur there.

I have not said anything like it could be falsified which you for a fact from reading my posts. Why do you invent that false accusation. Do you enjoy lying?

---

(May 12, 2013 at 8:44 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: Oh man on man. I knew this guy was nutty based on his anti-Israel threads which are full of tripe and misinformation

If in fact that is the case why do Israeli jewish newspapers publish "tripe and misinformation" in their online English language editions?

Quote: but it looks like he just took a turn to full retard. You need someone to define the holocaust for you?

Noting that believers cannot define it, it follows that holohuggers have no idea what they believe in.

Quote:People don't want to argue with you because your position has no legitimacy and we have no wish to give you any. You are dug into your own neo-nazi position and if you don't believe in the holocaust I doubt the mountains of evidence are going to convince you.

Anyone reading this thread can see the holohuggers are not arguing, are NOT defending their claims after I point out they are not relevant, because there is no answer. When it comes to the prurient but trivial human skin claim it is perfectly reasonable to ask how religion and cause of death were determined is it not? Besides look closely at them. Who ever heard of a real Jew with a tattoo?

As I noted to person who did not get involved, the failure to document this subject amounts to criminal negligence.

---

(May 12, 2013 at 3:09 pm)A Theist Wrote:

(May 12, 2013 at 8:44 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: Oh man on man. I knew this guy was nutty based on his anti-Israel threads which are full of tripe and misinformation but it looks like he just took a turn to full retard. You need someone to define the holocaust for you? People don't want to argue with you because your position has no legitimacy and we have no wish to give you any. You are dug into your own neo-nazi position and if you don't believe in the holocaust I doubt the mountains of evidence are going to convince you.

The guy's brain is poisoned by his own neonazi propaganda...there's no sense arguing with, or entertaining this nazi troll...he's going to reject any and all evidence of a holocaust anyway...what's the point...let him drag his nazi ass back to Stormfront where he has a willing and listening audience full of other bigots and racists who'll drink his Kool Aid...

Another person who enjoys being a liar. It is believers who have no idea what they believe in because they cannot define what they are talking about. Pictures without traceability and not even with attribution and which are not even interesting are claimed as evidence without even saying evidence of what.

Theists do a much better job than holohuggers. At least they do not refuse to define what they mean by god. Usually they take a shot at it. They do not say, "You know what I mean and here is a picture of a church to prove it." Admittedly some come close.

Was the claim of the resurrection of Jesus more truthful in the 2nd c. AD because that was closer in time to the claimed event?

You guys are all idiots. You're arguing with someone who, essentially, believes that the moon landings were a hoax and a conspiracy and therefore all the "evidence" is really the work of those behind the conspiracy!

You give him pictures, and he says "those are of something else, nana-nana", so what? You show pictures in a court of law, they are what they are, it's up to the other side to disprove your evidence once it has been lodged, not up to you to prove the identity of everybody in the picture.

For there to be a genuine chance of there being a conspiracy you have to bring evidence that one exists. You have to show that it is possible that a conspiracy may exist, and you have to be able to show that the evidence does not fit the official version of events. Once the conspiracy theorist dismisses evidence he doesn't like, you know he's living in lala land. There's simply no excusing it; nobody dismisses evidence before it can be proved that the evidence itself is bad, or without good reason to believe it so.

That is why Predictable Bob is predictable.

Y'all should have let me play with him, I've seen this game before...

(May 12, 2013 at 4:04 pm)A_Nony_Mouse Wrote:

(May 12, 2013 at 4:53 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Time to die thread.

This one knows all the evidence that we can throw at him but has decided to live in denial.

I say let him.

This false belief is at his core now and now matter what evidence we show him he will come back with "but that could be falsified", "that woman could have been lying", "show me the DNA evidence" (from before the discovery of DNA).

No this is holocaust "flat earther".

Best to ignore him.

How can anything be evidence for something no one can define? A real big non sequitur there.

I have not said anything like it could be falsified which you for a fact from reading my posts. Why do you invent that false accusation. Do you enjoy lying?

Well as I was predicting the sort of thing you would say and not misquoting you I find your hissy fit rather amusing.

I made that comment because of your twisting the facts about Hitlers beliefs, you managed to persuade yourself that someone who professed a belief in god in writing many many times could not be a theist because it would be good politics to put on a christian front.

This would be like saying Pope John Paul did not believe in god, sure all he evidence says he did, but what he believed in his heart, can we really know for sure?

DIE THREAD DIE.

(May 13, 2013 at 6:35 am)Aractus Wrote: You guys are all idiots. You're arguing with someone who, essentially, believes that the moon landings were a hoax

people who believe the moon landings were a hoax actually believe that it was a hoax......... which is actually a fun conspiracy too debate because even if the first landing was a hoax...... it really doesn't mean fuck all............

holocaust deniers are neo nazis (and in some rare cases ultra militant muslims) who KNOW FOR A FACT that the holocaust was real

this pathetic excuse for a person knows the holocaust was real but thinks if he can deny the holocaust enough (something which is a crime in dozens of countries) he can bring back nazi politics....unfortunately he's realized atheist websites permit blatant religous bigotry and most racist politics.....

never the less.........other than the fact that inbreeding produces freakish humans..............see hapsburg jaw syndrome...............



and the fact that most nazis believe aryans were related too an alien race............... these scumbags actually think that their theories are harmeless............ writings like this specific assholes.......... have produced mass murders like anders breivik and timothy mcveigh........ hopefully this sad excuse for a human being will be shot before he can influence people with his pathetic attempts at rewriting history

...........that and he's fucking nuts

Oh come on now. What better way to expose people to everything you find abhorrent about a position then to keep it's proponents talking about it as loudly as possible, as often as possible, to as many people as possible?

What's needed here is a megaphone, not a bullet.