(May 24, 2013 at 5:24 pm)ideologue08 Wrote:

(May 24, 2013 at 5:19 pm)Godschild Wrote: If they had decided to use them no one would be able to defend themselves.

What, you mean like Sandy Hook? They didn't use a gun here, gun nuts can only be found in the US. Doesn't the fact that a machete was used clearly signal how much safer our laws are compared to yours?

Gun or no gun the guy is still dead and his family suffering, my point is that if someone wants to kill a person they will find a way. Here they know if they just bring a machete they screwed up, because it will turn into a gun fight.

---

(May 24, 2013 at 5:42 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: That's redneck logic. 20 something people killed by a gun=> We want guns! 1 person killed by machete=> You should have had guns!

It might be redneck but the terrorist would be history.

Restrictions on freedom of speech because it offends you. That is not freedom.

You should have the freedom to say whatever you want when ever you want. Freedom of speech in United States of America is to protect the minority, and it is not there to protect the majority. No one is calling for the suppression of popular speech. If majority rules, then Islam would have been ban in America long time ago.

Words do not hurt other people. Acting on words can!

I lose faith in humanity when people want to control others.

Side note! It is sad for those two to kill a soldier, whom would protect their rights to practice their religion. There is no war on Islam, Christians, or any other religion in America or Europe. Some religious figures are proposing there is, because they do not get YES answer to everything.

Fucking "truthers"

http://truthfrequencyradio.com/exclusive...confirmed/

Quote:The world is all a stage. Call me jaded, cynical, skeptical or even out right crazy but this event has all of the same earmarks as the Sandy Hook, The Boston Marathon Bombing and so many recent events. The stage is a some-what well organized area, actors seem to be placed in strategic areas waiting for their cue and once again we see the remarkable absence of blood. The story as reported by Sky News and the BBC are also full of anti-Islamic propaganda, even going so far as to claim the “perpetrator” yelled“Allahu akbar,” just before beheading the man.

I imagine these people sitting at home with their tin foil hats on picking apart every news item.

The props must of have been well stage. As, I have seen pictures of the body, head, and performers. Blood and body looks real to me.

(May 24, 2013 at 6:35 pm)cato123 Wrote: You aren't talking about restricting speech in order to maintain public safety; i.e., not having the freedom to yell fire in a theater. You advocate censorship because you don't agree with what's being said. Huge difference.

You mean a bit like this forum?

---

(May 25, 2013 at 1:54 am)Godschild Wrote: It might be redneck but the terrorist would be history.

Well, more than 20 children were history in Sandy Hook...doesn't take a genius to figure out why those things don't happen in the UK...

The forum is private own. Not a country/state.

(May 25, 2013 at 7:26 am)ideologue08 Wrote: Well, more than 20 children were history in Sandy Hook...doesn't take a genius to figure out why those things don't happen in the UK...

because the UK has great mental health facilities similair to what america had before ronald reagan.....what the fucking hell this has to do with the woolwich killing is beyond me... the murderer was a radical islamist who was bent on creating a situation of terror for soldiers walking in their homecountries streets........not a bad form of psychological warfare if you ask me..........and it was most likely encouraged by some wackjob imam from the middle east..... sandy hook was not enocouraged by a religous leader of any kind so what the flying fuck are you on about???

So, what if a shop banned black people from coming in? That's a private business isn't it? Should the Govt. not step in? You scum. Unconditional freedom does not work.

My opinion is all that matters to me. I do not want Hannity on UK television, you guys can watch all the redneck propoganda scum you want in the US. I'm against unconditional freedom of speech and thankfully, so are the vast majority of Brits

---

(May 25, 2013 at 7:33 am)cratehorus Wrote: because the UK has great mental health facilities similair to what america had before ronald reagan.....what the fucking hell this has to do with the woolwich killing is beyond me... the murderer was a radical isalmist who was bent on creating a situation of terror for soldiers walking in their homecountries streets........not a bad form of psychological warfare if you ask me..........and it was most likely encouraged by some wackjob imam from the middle east..... sandy hook was not enocouraged by a religous leader of any kind so what the flying fuck are you on about???

We're talking about gun laws you fucking idiot. Just how illiterate are you? How's it working out in the US, fucker? More and more massacres year-on-year, only a matter of time before the next one.

Private business does work. You idiot (you start name calling first). What stops people from banning black people? Its call the opinion of the populous/customers. People will stop doing business with that company, which will in turn hurt business. Business have to target and attract their customers, since it is about making money (the bottom line). I will not do business with a company that bans blacks, and I am sure many people feel the same way in America.

Again, you are the center of the world. You opinion is the only one that matters. That is how Hannity feels as well, which makes you no better than him, but in a America he can express those views in the public, even tho I do not agree with them. Fox News is a minority in the USA.

He brings up gun laws, because the men were armed with firearms.

Gun laws in the USA is fine. It is the mental health care system, and the background checks. UK/Europe have many more stabbing than the United States, so I guess they should ban knives.

(May 25, 2013 at 7:55 am)Dragonetti Wrote: Private business does work. You idiot (you start name calling first). What stops people from banning black people? Its call the opinion of the populous/customers. People will stop doing business with that company, which will in turn hurt business. Business have to target and attract their customers, since it is about making money (the bottom line). I will not do business with a company that bans blacks, and I am sure many people feel the same way in America.

Again, you are the center of the world. You opinion is the only one that matters. That is how Hannity feels as well, which makes you no better than him, but in a America he can express those views in the public, even tho I do not agree with them. Fox News is a minority in the USA.

He brings up gun laws, because the men were armed with firearms.

Gun laws in the USA is fine. It is the mental health care system, and the background checks. UK/Europe have many more stabbing than the United States, so I guess they should ban knives.

Just fuck you. If you want to tolerate a society of enshrined racism that's up to you, cocksucker. I'm glad no country agrees with your racist ass.

I don't care about your opinion because I don't. You're the one that wants Hannity propaganda on TV, not me. We won't have scum with redneck opinions on our TV screens here. Thanks, but no thanks. Fox has the largest viewership in the US, get your facts straight. And MSNBC are just as biased, a liberal propaganda machine.

"Gun laws in the USA are fine" -Redneck. There's a surprise. It's fine for gun massacres to happen isn't it, you sadistic cretin? You wouldn't mind that wouldn't you? Keeps you bloodthirsty people entertained. A gun is like a knife, isn't it? Kills about the sane number of people does it? You can't reason with rednecks.