You're not answering the question; what was the point in mentioning Theists? If you can't answer the question, just say so, don't pretend to be something you're not.

(May 30, 2013 at 5:43 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: Now, was there a point in mentioning Theists or not?

Let's see:

(May 30, 2013 at 5:43 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: It makes no difference to me whether someone is Atheist, Agnostic or Deist, it's all the same to me.

What was that again about basic english comprehension?

So you can't answer the question then? As expected.

lol, a grammar nazi

(May 30, 2013 at 5:52 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: So you can't answer the question then? As expected.

How ironic, you come swooping in here complaining about a simple typo, and now I have to literally spell out the answer to a question you already answered yourself. LOL.

It seems safe to assume, at this point, that you did not read the OP, or you would have quickly deduced that there is a false perception among Theists about what Atheists represent.

You obviously understood the dilemma I presented, as you yourself responded to it by declaring that all non-specific religious terms are the same to you. A position, by the way, that's ridiculous in itself, especially coming from someone who's a self-proclaimed authority on English Comprehension.

(May 30, 2013 at 6:41 pm)smax Wrote: How ironic, you come swooping in here complaining about a simple typo, and now I have to literally spell out the answer to a question you already answered yourself. LOL.

What a load of tosh. You still haven't answered the question; why did you refer to Theists only, when Atheists also make the same mistake? It's like me using your typo and other Atheists' typos, and complaining that a lot of Atheists make typos. The fact that you can't understand this tells me you're an ignorant person who can't be helped.

(May 30, 2013 at 5:56 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: lol, a grammar nazi

Definition

Grammar Nazi (a.k.a. Grammar Police) refers to someone who believes it is his/her duty to amend any grammar and/or spelling mistakes made by others in conversation. In most cases, the term carries a negative connotation of either being a buzzkiller who ruins a good joke by getting too technical or a n00b that’s fallen into the Grammar Trap, an intentional practice of using incorrect grammar for the purpose of spotting a Grammar Nazi.

---

(May 30, 2013 at 6:46 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: What a load of tosh. You still haven't answered the question; why did you refer to Theists only, when Atheists also make the same mistake? It's like me using your typo and other Atheists' typos, and complaining that a lot of Atheists make typos. The fact that you can't understand this tells me you're an ignorant person who can't be helped.

I don't agree that it's a common mistake among Atheists. Every single Atheist I know understands the term perfectly well.

I'm starting to think maybe you didn't understand the term prior to this thread, and by clicking on it, your rather selective evil perception of what Atheists are got ruined.

Now you are just bitter. Get over it. You are a Theist, disappointment is par for the course.

(May 30, 2013 at 6:46 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: What a load of tosh. You still haven't answered the question; why did you refer to Theists only, when Atheists also make the same mistake? It's like me using your typo and other Atheists' typos, and complaining that a lot of Atheists make typos. The fact that you can't understand this tells me you're an ignorant person who can't be helped.

The guy who resorts to calling people nazi states that others are ignorant.


He refered to theists after the observation of behavior patters, it was pointed out to him that this behaviorpatterns are not restricted to theists.

His lack of pointing out that this behavior is not only common amongst theists is not sufficiant enought to make a case for his ignorance, it simply shows that he didnt observe the behavior patterns of non theist, or forgot to take those into consideration.


You are simply a flaming moron and gilgameshs new fuck buddy in annoying people.

(May 30, 2013 at 6:46 pm)smax Wrote: I don't agree that it's a common mistake among Atheists. Ever single Atheist I know understands the term perfectly well.

I'm starting to think maybe you didn't understand the term prior to this thread, and by clicking on it, your rather selective evil perception of what Atheists are got ruined.

Now you are just bitter. Get over it. You are a Theist, disappointment is par for the course.

I don't agree that it's a common mistake among Theists. Every single Theist I know understands the term perfectly well.

Like I said before, you're ignorant and you can't be helped. You also have problems understanding basic English comprehension, are you dyslexic? If you are, it's nothing to be ashamed about you know.

---

(May 30, 2013 at 6:53 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: The guy who resorts to calling people nazi states that others are ignorant.

He refered to theists after the observation of behavior patters, it was pointed out to him that this behaviorpatterns are not restricted to theists.

You are simply a flaming moron and gilgameshs new fuck buddy in annoying people.

It's very ironic you use the term "Nazi" to describe other people...haha

Yes, I pointed out to him that Atheists also make the same mistake, but he's being willfully ignorant about it.

Better than being Hitler's fuckbuddy. Just like Hitler, you're an ignorant man filled with hatred and I can't help you.

(May 30, 2013 at 6:56 pm)ideologue08 Wrote: It's very ironic you use the term "Nazi" to describe other people...haha

Yes, I pointed out to him that Atheists also make the same mistake, but he's being willfully ignorant about it.

Better than being Hitler's fuckbuddy. Just like Hitler, you're an ignorant man filled with hatred and I can't help you.

No he is not willfully ignorant of it. He wanted to discuss this behaviorpattern concerning theists specificaly, and doesnt deny anywhere that this behavior does not occure amongst non theists.

Final warning: do not call me a nazi again unless you can prove it.

The very fact that you resort to name calling an insults underlines that you are not here for debate but for the purpose of amusing yourself through flaming up tentions between you and other members.