(May 30, 2013 at 9:56 pm)catfish Wrote: lol
So man, are you one of those literal fundementalist atheists or are you a logical, coherent one?
?

I'm a realistically reinforced reality-based realist.

How about you? Are you one of those cherry picking scripturalists or a selective literal figuratist?

(May 30, 2013 at 10:18 pm)smax Wrote:

(May 30, 2013 at 9:56 pm)catfish Wrote: lol
So man, are you one of those literal fundementalist atheists or are you a logical, coherent one?
?

I'm a realistically reinforced reality-based realist.

How about you? Are you one of those cherry picking scripturalists or a selective literal figuratist?

You quoted scripture, not me. So I have the option of showing you how little you know about the bible.

first I want to know something, are you a literal fundementalist or what? Besides that, what the fuck was that quote supposed to prove? That a child died?
Really man, what was the point of that?

(May 30, 2013 at 10:23 pm)catfish Wrote:

(May 30, 2013 at 10:18 pm)smax Wrote: I'm a realistically reinforced reality-based realist.

How about you? Are you one of those cherry picking scripturalists or a selective literal figuratist?

You quoted scripture, not me. So I have the option of showing you how little you know about the bible.

first I want to know something, are you a literal fundementalist or what? Besides that, what the fuck was that quote supposed to prove? That a child died?
Really man, what was the point of that?

You won't have any luck showing me how little I know about the Bible, especially if you can't even understand the most basic implications of the text.

God killed this child as a punishment for David's sin.

Did you really miss that, or was that part just on ignore?

Or, even worse, are you arguing that it's perfectly okay with you?

(May 30, 2013 at 10:29 pm)smax Wrote:

(May 30, 2013 at 10:23 pm)catfish Wrote: You quoted scripture, not me. So I have the option of showing you how little you know about the bible.

first I want to know something, are you a literal fundementalist or what? Besides that, what the fuck was that quote supposed to prove? That a child died?
Really man, what was the point of that?

You won't have any luck showing me how little I know about the Bible, especially if you can't even understand the most basic implications of the text.

God killed this child as a punishment for David's sin.

Did you really miss that, or was that part just on ignore?

Or, even worse, are you arguing that it's perfectly okay with you?

Cool, you're a hardcore fundy.

Ezekiel 22:28

(May 30, 2013 at 10:43 pm)catfish Wrote:

(May 30, 2013 at 10:29 pm)smax Wrote: You won't have any luck showing me how little I know about the Bible, especially if you can't even understand the most basic implications of the text.

God killed this child as a punishment for David's sin.

Did you really miss that, or was that part just on ignore?

Or, even worse, are you arguing that it's perfectly okay with you?

Cool, you're a hardcore fundy.

Ezekiel 22:28

You don't have to convince me that the whole book is bullshit, I'm already there.

But that doesn't change what it says.

(May 30, 2013 at 10:48 pm)smax Wrote:

(May 30, 2013 at 10:43 pm)catfish Wrote: Cool, you're a hardcore fundy.

Ezekiel 22:28

You don't have to convince me that the whole book is bullshit, I'm already there.

But that doesn't change what it says.

lol!
Yes, it does... It changes the shit you quoted as "from God" to shit quoted "from man". I'm sure you'll deny it being the hardcore fundy that you are.

Just to rub it in, tell me what you think of Judges 13:7.

---

BTW, what "realistically reinforced reality-based realist" type shit convinced you that quoting scripture as a rebutal to my argument was a good idea? You can read my signature, can't you?

How about this, then?

Numbers 5:11-31(KGV) Wrote:11 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,

12 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man's wife go aside, and commit a trespass against him,

13 And a man lie with her carnally, and it be hid from the eyes of her husband, and be kept close, and she be defiled, and there be no witness against her, neither she be taken with the manner;

14 And the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be not defiled:

15 Then shall the man bring his wife unto the priest, and he shall bring her offering for her, the tenth part of an ephah of barley meal; he shall pour no oil upon it, nor put frankincense thereon; for it is an offering of jealousy, an offering of memorial, bringing iniquity to remembrance.

16 And the priest shall bring her near, and set her before the Lord:

17 And the priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel; and of the dust that is in the floor of the tabernacle the priest shall take, and put it into the water:

18 And the priest shall set the woman before the Lord, and uncover the woman's head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which is the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causeth the curse:

19 And the priest shall charge her by an oath, and say unto the woman, If no man have lain with thee, and if thou hast not gone aside to uncleanness with another instead of thy husband, be thou free from this bitter water that causeth the curse:

20 But if thou hast gone aside to another instead of thy husband, and if thou be defiled, and some man have lain with thee beside thine husband:

21 Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The Lord make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the Lord doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell;

22 And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen.

23 And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water:

24 And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water that causeth the curse: and the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter.

25 Then the priest shall take the jealousy offering out of the woman's hand, and shall wave the offering before the Lord, and offer it upon the altar:

26 And the priest shall take an handful of the offering, even the memorial thereof, and burn it upon the altar, and afterward shall cause the woman to drink the water.

27 And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people.

28 And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed.

29 This is the law of jealousies, when a wife goeth aside to another instead of her husband, and is defiled;

30 Or when the spirit of jealousy cometh upon him, and he be jealous over his wife, and shall set the woman before the Lord, and the priest shall execute upon her all this law.

31 Then shall the man be guiltless from iniquity, and this woman shall bear her iniquity.

(May 30, 2013 at 10:56 pm)catfish Wrote:

(May 30, 2013 at 10:48 pm)smax Wrote: You don't have to convince me that the whole book is bullshit, I'm already there.

But that doesn't change what it says.

lol!
Yes, it does... It changes the shit you quoted as "from God" to shit quoted "from man". I'm sure you'll deny it being the hardcore fundy that you are.

Just to rub it in, tell me what you think of Judges 13:7.

---

BTW, what "realistically reinforced reality-based realist" type shit convinced you that quoting scripture as a rebutal to my argument was a good idea? You can read my signature, can't you?

Wait a minute, did you just argue that all of scripture is possibly bullshit and then argue that it's still morally binding?

Now that's worth a LOL.

(May 31, 2013 at 5:38 am)smax Wrote: Wait a minute, did you just argue that all of scripture is possibly bullshit and then argue that it's still morally binding?

Now that's worth a LOL.

You're talking to catfish... only his very own special bits of the book are actual worth following... Try reading his signature.

(May 31, 2013 at 6:13 am)pocaracas Wrote:

(May 31, 2013 at 5:38 am)smax Wrote: Wait a minute, did you just argue that all of scripture is possibly bullshit and then argue that it's still morally binding?

Now that's worth a LOL.

You're talking to catfish... only his very own special bits of the book are actual worth following... Try reading his signature.

i really do need to start doing that