"Matthew's account follows the lineage of Joseph, while Luke's account also follows the lineage of Mary. Both show a direct connection between Jesus and David"

Wikipedia

(August 12, 2013 at 1:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: "Matthew's account follows the lineage of Joseph, while Luke's account also follows the lineage of Mary. Both show a direct connection between Jesus and David"

Wikipedia

No, they don't -- unless Joseph was actually Jesus's father, which the "inspired" word of God says wasn't the case.

(August 12, 2013 at 1:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: "Matthew's account follows the lineage of Joseph, while Luke's account also follows the lineage of Mary. Both show a direct connection between Jesus and David"

Wikipedia

Except both actually show the lineage of Joseph, not Mary. If his lineage is at all relevant, it makes the whole "Son of God" thing a little awkward.

(August 12, 2013 at 1:16 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:

(August 12, 2013 at 1:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Both show a direct connection between Jesus and David"

Wikipedia

No, they don't -- unless Joseph was actually Jesus's father, which the "inspired" word of God says wasn't the case.

lol

Bonus points for your level of ignorance

---

(August 12, 2013 at 1:25 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote:

(August 12, 2013 at 1:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: "Matthew's account follows the lineage of Joseph, while Luke's account also follows the lineage of Mary. Both show a direct connection between Jesus and David"

Wikipedia

Except both actually show the lineage of Joseph, not Mary. If his lineage is at all relevant, it makes the whole "Son of God" thing a little awkward.

Go check your information, because they do use Mary's lineage.

Check my information? Take a look for yourself at "my information"

Go look harder Nora.

(August 12, 2013 at 2:09 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Go look harder Nora.

Do you even know what having a point would entail?

(August 12, 2013 at 2:09 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Go look harder Nora.

No matter how hard I look, that still says "Joseph"

(August 12, 2013 at 2:20 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote:

(August 12, 2013 at 2:09 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Go look harder Nora.

No matter how hard I look, that still says "Joseph"

Well, see, Frodo thinks it's more logical that it says "Mary," but that claim, by its very nature, can't have evidence for it... so he must be right, right? And if you argue the point, you're really just supporting his, somehow.

Ain't that how this goes with you, Frods-a-poppin'?

(August 12, 2013 at 2:23 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(August 12, 2013 at 2:20 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote: No matter how hard I look, that still says "Joseph"

Well, see, Frodo thinks it's more logical that it says "Mary," but that claim, by its very nature, can't have evidence for it... so he must be right, right? And if you argue the point, you're really just supporting his, somehow.

Ain't that how this goes with you, Frods-a-poppin'?

So, fr0d0 says the Bible says Mary, Wikipedia (possibly edited by fr0d0) says the Bible says Mary, the actual Bible (which I took pics of on my phone as I was making the post containing said pics) says it says Joseph, but Fr0d0 and Wikipedia are correct, and the Bible is... wrong? Well, I knew that last part at least.