Well they didn't get much out of me by convincing me.

I never got over the disappointment of buying a toy for my wife only to find that not only did they not come with batteries......neither did she.

(October 10, 2013 at 3:37 pm)max-greece Wrote: Well they didn't get much out of me by convincing me.

I never got over the disappointment of buying a toy for my wife only to find that not only did they not come with batteries......neither did she.

Rookie mistake, not picking up the batteries at the same time.

Besides, if the toy is the only thing going in the bedroom, you're doing it wrong. Batteries might not be included, but most of those toys are multiplayer games.

Edit: I really, really love that Gracie's threads have become discussions on sex toys and gut microbes.

You should have gotten one of these, then!

(October 10, 2013 at 3:01 pm)daandaan Wrote: u ve just confirmed u r just copy pasting shit from the creatard site without even knowing what it says ..

If you have evidence that s/he is plagiarizing other's materials, PM me with the links to the source material, if you don't mind.

(October 10, 2013 at 3:49 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:

(October 10, 2013 at 3:01 pm)daandaan Wrote: u ve just confirmed u r just copy pasting shit from the creatard site without even knowing what it says ..

If you have evidence that s/he is plagiarizing other's materials, PM me with the links to the source material, if you don't mind.

i do not visite the creationist sites ...so i cant ...but i have seen it used before on youtube

everything they do here is copy paste from one of the creation sites

even their rebuttals are copy pasted ...thats why they fail when confronted with new material...like the stupid irrelevant questions the keep asking on my post on abiogenesis.

(October 10, 2013 at 3:55 pm)daandaan Wrote:

(October 10, 2013 at 3:49 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: If you have evidence that s/he is plagiarizing other's materials, PM me with the links to the source material, if you don't mind.

i do not visite the creationist sites ...so i cant ...but i have seen it used before on youtube

everything they do here is copy paste from one of the creation sites

I have looked and did not find any other instances of selected sentences that I ran through google. Which is why (in my capacity as an AF staff member), asked for any evidence you have of your accusation.

Please don't accuse people of plagiarism if you aren't prepared to demonstrate the truth of your claim.

(October 10, 2013 at 3:43 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I really, really love that Gracie's threads have become discussions on sex toys and gut microbes.

Something of substance had to come of it.

(October 10, 2013 at 2:41 pm)pocaracas Wrote: hmmm
Which ones are better?
Jelly?
vibrating?
balls?
string with pearls?
Smooth?
Bulgy with veins and a head?
Like a dolphin?

Something from Fun Factory, perhaps a 'Caterpillar'

(October 7, 2013 at 7:55 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:

(October 7, 2013 at 7:52 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote: Since you won't answer the question on the other thread, would a simple organism disprove god?

NO.

Answered again.

Then complex life can't prove the existence of god.

See, wasn't that simple?

(October 10, 2013 at 4:13 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote:

(October 7, 2013 at 7:55 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: NO.

Answered again.

Then complex life can't prove the existence of god.

See, wasn't that simple?

Oooo - owned!