(October 14, 2013 at 10:59 pm)Drich Wrote:

(October 14, 2013 at 9:47 pm)Waratah Wrote: Why did you insist saying it was a neighbour?

Because for me the word means the same thing.

Please reply to the whole post.

(October 14, 2013 at 11:08 pm)Waratah Wrote: So we don't lose focus. It is this post that we are going one step at a time.
Please reply to the whole post.

Sorry warpath, when you made these words your own you opened yourself to be beaten by them.

(October 14, 2013 at 11:18 pm)Drich Wrote:

(October 14, 2013 at 11:08 pm)Waratah Wrote: So we don't lose focus. It is this post that we are going one step at a time.
Please reply to the whole post.

Sorry warpath, when you made these words your own you opened yourself to be beaten by them.

Always looking for an out to cover your lying.

So we will accept that your excuses were lies.

Even your excuse of saying "Because for me the word means the same thing." does not stack up. All these posts for you to say that does not make sense. What does make sense is you trying to discredit my argument for seek via the use of neighbour instead of friend.

Please don't go all cry baby on me because I have called you a liar. You opened yourself up to this due to you not responding to my post fully. I gave you a chance to say where you "misspoken". I just have to assume you did not misspeak, just lied.

So we don't lose focus. It is this post that we are going one step at a time.

Next Step

Now I would like you now to show me where christ converts the asking into knocking?

Just as reminder you said this

"knocking as described by Christ is the repetive nature of the asking, and the fact this man remained at his neighbors door step asking/petitioning his neighbor for the bread he desperately needed."

Please don't keep on repeating answers that I have shown to be false.

(October 15, 2013 at 12:59 am)Waratah Wrote: Always looking for an out to cover your lying.

So we will accept that your excuses were lies.

Even your excuse of saying "Because for me the word means the same thing." does not stack up. All these posts for you to say that does not make sense. What does make sense is you trying to discredit my argument for seek via the use of neighbour instead of friend.

Your arguement fails either way whether it was a neighbor or friend that is why i do not understand why you are stuck on this.

Restate you arguement and I will refute it with 'friend' inplace of neighbor. also leave a link to your orginal arguement just to show your 'honesty.'

Which brings me to the only logical reason i see for you to care so much about the crap you have been making a fuss over, you loose on content either way it is read. It seems the only way you can even semi legitmatly argue anything is to argue semantics, which is all that you have done for 2 or 3 weeks. This make you a petty little man who lashes out at anything and everything that he has in his power to lash out with. Because your theology is next to none existance you grade papers and look for subtal inconsistancies and then blow them up even if they meaning nothing nor have any bearing on a topical discussion.

Quote:Now I would like you now to show me where christ converts the asking into knocking?

http://atheistforums.org/thread-20901-page-23.html Post 229

Quote:Just as reminder you said this

"knocking as described by Christ is the repetive nature of the asking, and the fact this man remained at his neighbors door step asking/petitioning his neighbor for the bread he desperately needed."

Please don't keep on repeating answers that I have shown to be false.

where did I say this??

(October 15, 2013 at 8:59 am)Drich Wrote:

(October 15, 2013 at 12:59 am)Waratah Wrote: Always looking for an out to cover your lying.

So we will accept that your excuses were lies.

Even your excuse of saying "Because for me the word means the same thing." does not stack up. All these posts for you to say that does not make sense. What does make sense is you trying to discredit my argument for seek via the use of neighbour instead of friend.

Your arguement fails either way whether it was a neighbor or friend that is why i do not understand why you are stuck on this.

Restate you arguement and I will refute it with 'friend' inplace of neighbor. also leave a link to your orginal arguement just to show your 'honesty.'

So if my argument already fails according to you , you must know what that argument is. What was my argument? If you don't remember then you do not have an open mind. Is this your problem drich that you decide on an argument before you know what it is. Sad.

Quote:Which brings me to the only logical reason i see for you to care so much about the crap you have been making a fuss over, you loose on content either way it is read. It seems the only way you can even semi legitmatly argue anything is to argue semantics, which is all that you have done for 2 or 3 weeks. This make you a petty little man who lashes out at anything and everything that he has in his power to lash out with.

Your problem is that you hate being wrong. I showed that you were wrong with your use of neighbour instead of friend. I have asked why you did that. You came up with 2 excuses which I was able to point out that they were lies. You refuse to reply to my posts, using excuses that are false(lies really).

Your logic is weird. Remember your comprehension of the good samaritan parable where you stated that it says anyone that you come in close proximity to is a neighbour.

Quote:Because your theology is next to none existance you grade papers and look for subtal inconsistancies and then blow them up even if they meaning nothing nor have any bearing on a topical discussion.

The fallacy of authority again? It clearly states to receive the holy spirit you must ask him. No a/s/k.

Quote:

Quote:Now I would like you now to show me where christ converts the asking into knocking?

https://atheistforums.org/thread-20901-page-23.html Post 229

Please show where in that post you are showing that christ converts asking into knocking? You should read Cthulhu Dreaming post again because it explains why a/s/k is not needed for the holy spirit. I suspect that the reason why Cthulhu Dreaming did not reply to your post is because somehow you have the audacity to make shit up and say it was combined and ignore the clear explanation of how it is not combined. Your logic is weird.

Quote:

Quote:Just as reminder you said this

"knocking as described by Christ is the repetive nature of the asking, and the fact this man remained at his neighbors door step asking/petitioning his neighbor for the bread he desperately needed."

Please don't keep on repeating answers that I have shown to be false.

where did I say this??

In a post.

My above answer is a drich answer.

You have more patience than I do, Waratah.

Putting up with that much of Drippy's silly shit is above and beyond the call of duty.

(October 15, 2013 at 5:57 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You have more patience than I do, Waratah.

Putting up with that much of Drippy's silly shit is above and beyond the call of duty.

Thanks for that, much appreciated.

I just love it when you can pin him down and he squeals. I was going to say, squeals like a pig, but that would give him too much credit and really pigs don't deserve that comparison.

(October 15, 2013 at 6:13 pm)Waratah Wrote: I just love it when you can pin him down and he squeals.

Now there's a mental image I didn't need.

(October 15, 2013 at 5:52 pm)Waratah Wrote:

(October 15, 2013 at 8:59 am)Drich Wrote: Your arguement fails either way whether it was a neighbor or friend that is why i do not understand why you are stuck on this.

Restate you arguement and I will refute it with 'friend' inplace of neighbor. also leave a link to your orginal arguement just to show your 'honesty.'

So if my argument already fails according to you , you must know what that argument is. What was my argument? If you don't remember then you do not have an open mind. Is this your problem drich that you decide on an argument before you know what it is. Sad.

Quote:Which brings me to the only logical reason i see for you to care so much about the crap you have been making a fuss over, you loose on content either way it is read. It seems the only way you can even semi legitmatly argue anything is to argue semantics, which is all that you have done for 2 or 3 weeks. This make you a petty little man who lashes out at anything and everything that he has in his power to lash out with.

Your problem is that you hate being wrong. I showed that you were wrong with your use of neighbour instead of friend. I have asked why you did that. You came up with 2 excuses which I was able to point out that they were lies. You refuse to reply to my posts, using excuses that are false(lies really).

Your logic is weird. Remember your comprehension of the good samaritan parable where you stated that it says anyone that you come in close proximity to is a neighbour.

Quote:Because your theology is next to none existance you grade papers and look for subtal inconsistancies and then blow them up even if they meaning nothing nor have any bearing on a topical discussion.

The fallacy of authority again? It clearly states to receive the holy spirit you must ask him. No a/s/k.

Quote:https://atheistforums.org/thread-20901-page-23.html Post 229

Please show where in that post you are showing that christ converts asking into knocking? You should read Cthulhu Dreaming post again because it explains why a/s/k is not needed for the holy spirit. I suspect that the reason why Cthulhu Dreaming did not reply to your post is because somehow you have the audacity to make shit up and say it was combined and ignore the clear explanation of how it is not combined. Your logic is weird.

Quote:where did I say this??

In a post.

My above answer is a drich answer.

You've left me nothing to respond to, except vague speculation, and personal opinion, which you are entitled to. No legitimate questions, no facts to contest. Come up with something or I will have to leave you with your speculations and personal opinions..

(October 15, 2013 at 9:34 pm)Drich Wrote:

(October 15, 2013 at 5:52 pm)Waratah Wrote: So if my argument already fails according to you , you must know what that argument is. What was my argument? If you don't remember then you do not have an open mind. Is this your problem drich that you decide on an argument before you know what it is. Sad.
Your problem is that you hate being wrong. I showed that you were wrong with your use of neighbour instead of friend. I have asked why you did that. You came up with 2 excuses which I was able to point out that they were lies. You refuse to reply to my posts, using excuses that are false(lies really).

Your logic is weird. Remember your comprehension of the good samaritan parable where you stated that it says anyone that you come in close proximity to is a neighbour.
The fallacy of authority again? It clearly states to receive the holy spirit you must ask him. No a/s/k.
Please show where in that post you are showing that christ converts asking into knocking? You should read Cthulhu Dreaming post again because it explains why a/s/k is not needed for the holy spirit. I suspect that the reason why Cthulhu Dreaming did not reply to your post is because somehow you have the audacity to make shit up and say it was combined and ignore the clear explanation of how it is not combined. Your logic is weird.
In a post.

My above answer is a drich answer.

You've left me nothing to respond to, except vague speculation, and personal opinion, which you are entitled to. No legitimate questions, no facts to contest. Come up with something or I will have to leave you with your speculations and personal opinions..

Plenty to respond to. See the following

What was my argument? The one you have already dismissed without knowing what it is.

This is a reminder of a past excuse that you have not conceded. Your logic is weird. Remember your comprehension of the good samaritan parable where you stated that it says anyone that you come in close proximity to is a neighbour. Don't worry drich I do not expect a comment, you have already shown your lack integrity.

So we don't lose focus. It is this post that we are going one step at a time.

Next Step

Now I would like you now to show me where christ converts the asking into knocking?

Your response

Quote:https://atheistforums.org/thread-20901-page-23.html Post 229

My Response clearly asks you to "please explain"(I put it in quotations for an in joke for Australians. An annoying voiced politician.).

Quote:Please show where in that post you are showing that christ converts asking into knocking? You should read Cthulhu Dreaming post again because it explains why a/s/k is not needed for the holy spirit. I suspect that the reason why Cthulhu Dreaming did not reply to your post is because somehow you have the audacity to make shit up and say it was combined and ignore the clear explanation of how it is not combined. Your logic is weird.

Just as reminder you said this

Quote:knocking as described by Christ is the repetive nature of the asking, and the fact this man remained at his neighbors door step asking/petitioning his neighbor for the bread he desperately needed.

Please don't keep on repeating answers that I have shown to be false.