(November 11, 2013 at 11:12 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(November 11, 2013 at 11:08 pm)snowtracks Wrote: i'm not giving any God of the gaps arguments when discussing issues so you really shouldn't keep whinning.

Then what's your point? All you've done so far is point out gaps in the science... what else could you be saying other than that?

one thing but not exclusively the only thing, don't assume something true just because science hasn't prove it so far.

there happens to be a sub-menu named 'Christianity', a sub, sub-menu 'abiogenesis'. so the discussion is atheistism, christianity, orgin of life. when i post a statement, there isn't an invisible tag line: 'therefore God exist'.

What in fuckstick's name is 'atheistism' ?

(November 12, 2013 at 12:05 am)apophenia Wrote:


What in fuckstick's name is 'atheistism' ?

I just got a shiver and a Vietnam style flashback to Savedbygracethrufaith's "atheistic origin science."

(November 12, 2013 at 12:05 am)apophenia Wrote:


What in fuckstick's name is 'atheistism' ?

only people with highly critical parents who insisted on exceptionally early toilet training would point out a spelling error on a mssg bd.

(November 12, 2013 at 12:18 am)snowtracks Wrote: only people with highly critical parents who insisted on exceptionally early toilet training would point out a spelling error on a mssg bd.

Did you just try to shame someone for learning it's bad to shit themselves early on?

(November 12, 2013 at 12:18 am)snowtracks Wrote:

(November 12, 2013 at 12:05 am)apophenia Wrote: What in fuckstick's name is 'atheistism' ?

only people with highly critical parents who insisted on exceptionally early toilet training would point out a spelling error on a mssg bd.

I'm gonna let this one slide. Enjoy the forum.

(November 12, 2013 at 12:20 am)apophenia Wrote:

(November 12, 2013 at 12:18 am)snowtracks Wrote: only people with highly critical parents who insisted on exceptionally early toilet training would point out a spelling error on a mssg bd.

I'm gonna let this one slide. Enjoy the forum.

touché

(November 11, 2013 at 11:53 pm)apophenia Wrote:


Ah, yes, and there's the "science is a grand conspiracy against jebus" bullshit, right on schedule. We don't need atomic clocks to set our watches against, we just have to set our watches by the pace at which the creationists rolls out the same, tired, many times refuted, bullshit arguments and we're good to go.


By the way, did you mean to type 'whining' or 'winning' there, because both apply.

I love that. Very concise. You hit the sniper right in the scope. 0:58

---

(November 12, 2013 at 12:18 am)snowtracks Wrote:

(November 12, 2013 at 12:05 am)apophenia Wrote:


What in fuckstick's name is 'atheistism' ?

only people with highly critical parents who insisted on exceptionally early toilet training would point out a spelling error on a mssg bd.

Easy cowboy...Don't rattle her cage.

(November 11, 2013 at 8:47 pm)Esquilax Wrote:

(November 11, 2013 at 8:42 pm)snowtracks Wrote: researcher haven't found that to be true - after panspermia lost it appeal due to ultraviolet radiation studies demonstrating that bacterial spores couldn't survive inter-stellar travel, researchers turned their attention to focusing on finding chemical routes that would produce molecular building blocks. after researching for decades, paul davies wrote investigators are baffled at this point but won't admit it publicly due to concern that funding will be curtailed. so stealthy, have turned their attention back to panspermia with a twist which is travel only within earth's solar system; hence the big hullabaloo about mars and it's moons.

So you're resorting to arguments from ignorance again?

Seriously, even if they haven't found it yet, it doesn't mean there was a designer. Rather than poking holes in the available science- and relying on your profound misunderstanding of such to do so- you need to provide positive evidence for your position.

evidence of life on planet earth has been discovered as early as 3.8 billion years ago. this places life's marker right after the heavy sun radiation bombardment period. this wasn't suppose to happen per the naturalism model, but even they say this is the evidence and they will have to deal with it.

(November 15, 2013 at 3:13 am)snowtracks Wrote: evidence of life on planet earth has been discovered as early as 3.8 billion years ago. this places life's marker right after the heavy sun radiation bombardment period. this wasn't suppose to happen per the naturalism model, but even they say this is the evidence and they will have to deal with it.

Certainly, but there isn't a "naturalism model," there's just methodological naturalism, which concerns itself with what's demonstrable. I don't really see what your point is, though: of course our models of the universe and life origins will change according to new information coming in, because we don't know everything yet.

If we didn't change as the facts did, we'd be religion.