(December 5, 2013 at 8:39 pm)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Burn.

Really, because I interpret it as a compliment.

(December 5, 2013 at 8:40 pm)Kitanetos Wrote:

(December 5, 2013 at 8:39 pm)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Burn.

Really, because I interpret it as a compliment.

Oh yeah, resorting to deceitful debate tactics and completely misconstruing someone else's message is definitely something to be proud of. Then again, you admitted to being a sociopath, so I'm not surprised that you would resort to such underhanded tactics.

(December 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm)BreadGod Wrote: Oh yeah, resorting to deceitful debate tactics and completely misconstruing someone else's message is definitely something to be proud of. Then again, you admitted to being a sociopath, so I'm not surprised that you would resort to such underhanded tactics.

I merely reached a logical conclusion based upon the information you provided.

Guns will be irrelevant at some point in the not to distant future as our society becomes more and more digital and electronic. What good would it do to rob someone if they have nothing on them you can use to extract money from them with?

The 2nd amendment also lists things like "well-regulated" and "militia." I agree with both of those. Gun laws are necessary, and need to be regulated efficiently. And if militia does not mean military, then it at least needs to mean some form of training and evaluation and licensing.

(December 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm)BreadGod Wrote:

(December 5, 2013 at 8:40 pm)Kitanetos Wrote: Really, because I interpret it as a compliment.

Oh yeah, resorting to deceitful debate tactics and completely misconstruing someone else's message is definitely something to be proud of. Then again, you admitted to being a sociopath, so I'm not surprised that you would resort to such underhanded tactics.

Blow your indignation out your ass. This isn't a formal debate, and besides...






...burn. :p

---

(December 5, 2013 at 9:32 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote: Guns will be irrelevant at some point in the not to distant future as our society becomes more and more digital and electronic. What good would it do to rob someone if they have nothing on them you can use to extract money from them with?

Crimes of passion, hidden or subsequent mental instability, generalized 'Hey y'all, check this shit out' dumbfuckery...common gun related incidents without theft. I don't have your optomism that guns will be irrelevant anytime soon. However, the US is trending down with gun ownership, so you may be onto something.

(December 5, 2013 at 10:55 pm)Captain Colostomy Wrote:

(December 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm)BreadGod Wrote: Oh yeah, resorting to deceitful debate tactics and completely misconstruing someone else's message is definitely something to be proud of. Then again, you admitted to being a sociopath, so I'm not surprised that you would resort to such underhanded tactics.

Blow your indignation out your ass. This isn't a formal debate, and besides...






...burn. :p

---

(December 5, 2013 at 9:32 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote: Guns will be irrelevant at some point in the not to distant future as our society becomes more and more digital and electronic. What good would it do to rob someone if they have nothing on them you can use to extract money from them with?

Crimes of passion, hidden or subsequent mental instability, generalized 'Hey y'all, check this shit out' dumbfuckery...common gun related incidents without theft. I don't have your optomism that guns will be irrelevant anytime soon. However, the US is trending down with gun ownership, so you may be onto something.

But once the notion that you need it for self-defense becomes even more irrelevant than it already is for 99% of the population, I think the trend will only strengthen and it will also be easier to have the debate and make meaningful changes.

I am also optimistic that the GOP will continue their downward trend and as they lose more and more influence, so will the gun craze.

Barring Apophos creaming our corn, I reckon future generations will think our gun fascination a silly thing to have argued over.



I just hope phasers are only set on 'stun' at that time...