Hard to tell. Xtians rarely make a good first impression.

Hey Danny, found any evidence for the resurrection yet?

That's because there is none.


Don't be so cruel Zen

(January 2, 2014 at 1:06 am)Aractus Wrote:

(January 2, 2014 at 12:31 am)Minimalist Wrote: It doesn't even claim to have been written by an eye-witness you poor deluded schmuck.

These are anonymous writings which did not get their apostolic names until the late 2d century. Reality must be hard for you?

So what? Every early manuscript we have of John with page 1 intact says "Gospel according to John". The earliest of which is late 2nd century (and we have two of them), so your claim is demonstrably false. I appreciate your POV being based on evidence Min, but your claim that they didn't get their apostolic names until then would mean that we have the two first copies made with "Gospel According to John" on them?

So what? Does this mean The World According to Garp was written by Garp?

Quote:So what? Every early manuscript we have of John with page 1 intact says "Gospel according to John".

Holy fucking shitballs, Danny..are you stupid or have you just gotten desperate?

All we have are copies of copies of copies and yes, all of them were made by dutiful xtian scribes who were told to write that stupid shit across the top. Time to wake the fuck up, boy.

(January 2, 2014 at 12:42 pm)Minimalist Wrote: All we have are copies of copies of copies and yes, all of them were made by dutiful xtian scribes who were told to write that stupid shit across the top.

You're just repeating what I already said. We have copies of copies of copies, and as such being that the first two (near complete) copies of John are different to each other due to this, we know they titles didn't originate late 2nd century.

Then understand that NONE OF THE FUCKING THINGS WERE WRITTEN BY APOSTLES BECAUSE THERE WERE NO FUCKING APOSTLES.

That statement is well outside of general scholarly thought, so I won't bother entertaining it.

(January 3, 2014 at 4:54 am)Aractus Wrote: That statement is well outside of general scholarly thought, so I won't bother entertaining it.

Hey Danny, why are you ignoring my question about the resurrection?