Posts: 1246
Threads: 14
Joined: January 5, 2014
Reputation:
9
WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 14, 2014 at 7:09 pm
In (Heb 10:5-6) Why does paul add "but a body thou hast prepared for me" why doe he add words to the text in (psa 40:6). Dont add words to make it fit jesus. Agnia in hebrew means ears, not body. Even the Wistminster Leningrad Codex, which has the Hebrew words, does not feature the words for "body" or "prepared" in this verse. The reason you haven't found "a body you have prepared for me" in the Torah is because that was another edit by Paul. Psalms 40:6 reads "Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but my ears you have opened for me" ( this is from the NIV!). King David is saying he would bring offerings, but they are not as important to G-D as opening one's ears and listening to His commandments!
Quite simply: "oznayim" in Hebrew is the plural form of the word "ear." "Karisa" is the root word "kaf-raysh," which means "excavate; dig" (as also found in Genesis 50:5: "Bury me in the tomb I dug [karisi] for myself in the land of Canaan") with the suffix denoting 2nd person, past tense. Why the change?
Posts: 46844
Threads: 545
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
108
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 14, 2014 at 7:19 pm
When you post things here of which you are not the author, it is customary to include a citation along with your post. In this case, such a citation should consist of - at a minimum - that name of the source you're copying from, and the author of it.
In future, please add 'from "Biblical Nonsense: A Review Of The Bible For Doubting Christians" by Dr. Jason Long'.
Alternatively, you could simply post http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/
That way, people won't accuse you of plagiarism.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 3226
Threads: 244
Joined: April 17, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 14, 2014 at 7:32 pm
I read all-caps in the voice of police officer Barbrady.
My ignore list
"The lord doesn't work in mysterious ways, but in ways that are indistinguishable from his nonexistence."
-- George Yorgo Veenhuyzen quoted by John W. Loftus in The End of Christianity (p. 103).
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 14, 2014 at 7:33 pm
(January 14, 2014 at 7:09 pm)truthBtold Wrote: In (Heb 10:5-6) Why does paul add "but a body thou hast prepared for me" why doe he add words to the text in (psa 40:6). Dont add words to make it fit jesus. Agnia in hebrew means ears, not body. Even the Wistminster Leningrad Codex, which has the Hebrew words, does not feature the words for "body" or "prepared" in this verse. The reason you haven't found "a body you have prepared for me" in the Torah is because that was another edit by Paul. Psalms 40:6 reads "Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but my ears you have opened for me" ( this is from the NIV!). King David is saying he would bring offerings, but they are not as important to G-D as opening one's ears and listening to His commandments!
Quite simply: "oznayim" in Hebrew is the plural form of the word "ear." "Karisa" is the root word "kaf-raysh," which means "excavate; dig" (as also found in Genesis 50:5: "Bury me in the tomb I dug [karisi] for myself in the land of Canaan") with the suffix denoting 2nd person, past tense. Why the change?
So if I look all this crap up and answer this like I did with your last post, will you in turn respond with " I knew someone would say this," and then proceed to spell out 'nut-huh' with your caps lock on, as you did with your last thread? Or will you be able to address the content of my rebuttal this time with the same attention to detail as you posted in the op?
Typically when something is plagiarized your only choice is the nut-huh response.
Posts: 1246
Threads: 14
Joined: January 5, 2014
Reputation:
9
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 14, 2014 at 7:55 pm
(This post was last modified: January 14, 2014 at 8:13 pm by truthBtold.)
(January 14, 2014 at 7:19 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: When you post things here of which you are not the author, it is customary to include a citation along with your post. In this case, such a citation should consist of - at a minimum - that name of the source you're copying from, and the author of it.
In future, please add 'from "Biblical Nonsense: A Review Of The Bible For Doubting Christians" by Dr. Jason Long'.
Alternatively, you could simply post http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/
That way, people won't accuse you of plagiarism.
Boru
thanks.
(January 14, 2014 at 7:33 pm)Drich Wrote: (January 14, 2014 at 7:09 pm)truthBtold Wrote: In (Heb 10:5-6) Why does paul add "but a body thou hast prepared for me" why doe he add words to the text in (psa 40:6). Dont add words to make it fit jesus. Agnia in hebrew means ears, not body. Even the Wistminster Leningrad Codex, which has the Hebrew words, does not feature the words for "body" or "prepared" in this verse. The reason you haven't found "a body you have prepared for me" in the Torah is because that was another edit by Paul. Psalms 40:6 reads "Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but my ears you have opened for me" ( this is from the NIV!). King David is saying he would bring offerings, but they are not as important to G-D as opening one's ears and listening to His commandments!
Quite simply: "oznayim" in Hebrew is the plural form of the word "ear." "Karisa" is the root word "kaf-raysh," which means "excavate; dig" (as also found in Genesis 50:5: "Bury me in the tomb I dug [karisi] for myself in the land of Canaan") with the suffix denoting 2nd person, past tense. Why the change?
So if I look all this crap up and answer this like I did with your last post, will you in turn respond with " I knew someone would say this," and then proceed to spell out 'nut-huh' with your caps lock on, as you did with your last thread? Or will you be able to address the content of my rebuttal this time with the same attention to detail as you posted in the op?
Typically when something is plagiarized your only choice is the nut-huh response.
I will address it.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 14, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Ok then let's start with a question. What makes you think Paul is quoting this psalm of David? Next question, do you know the difference between a psalm and scripture?
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 14, 2014 at 10:04 pm
They both smell like bullshit.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 15, 2014 at 10:33 am
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2014 at 10:33 am by Drich.)
(January 14, 2014 at 10:04 pm)Minimalist Wrote: They both smell like bullshit.
You know my grandpa had that problem too. Then we got him a sign that hung in front of the toilet at eye level reminding him to wipe... Short there after every thing stopped smell bullshit to him.
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 15, 2014 at 10:40 am
Let's back up a moment. Isn't Hebrews one of the epistles that many scholars consider to be of uncertain origin? Isn't Paul's authorship of that document in some doubt?
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?
January 15, 2014 at 11:29 am
(January 15, 2014 at 10:40 am)Crossless1 Wrote: Let's back up a moment. Isn't Hebrews one of the epistles that many scholars consider to be of uncertain origin? Isn't Paul's authorship of that document in some doubt?
yes
|