(April 1, 2010 at 9:25 am)RedFish Wrote: Wow, a bit insulting in your response, but par for the course. Do you drink? Alcohol I mean. I've read the paper, and it's not actually disproving anything I 'postulated'. They admit to their potential for inaccuracy, and the level of 'assumption' made. Almost to never is close enough for me, I mean no-one alive today was actually there, were they?
You be 45% mushroom, makes no difference to me. I see the reconstructed face, and a person, therefore a relative. Closer than a fkn bonobo anyway.

I get ridiculously tired of people's woo-laden assertions and unfounded statements teetering on ignorance. Like this or the dark matter woo in an earlier thread.

I am not surprised you have fallen back to the "it-looks-to-me" position, as your statements earlier were thoroughly devoid of any notion on current neanderthal gene sequencing. I am aware of the annoying primate urge to breed with things but this is ridiculous.

Yeah, it is closer than a bonobo. Whoop de fucking doo. It is much more relevant to talk about the gene exchange between chimps and early humans that lasted up to a thousand years, as it is proven. What you are talking about is weakly asserted. I don't need you to add to that - I have Pippy for that.

And seriously, the "no one was alive then" argument? Go die in a fire. I am so fucking sick of that old trope - just because you weren't personally there doesn't mean you cannot understand what occurred.

Alcohol question is unlinked to topic at hand - discarding.

Wow, musta really hurt when you fell, and to land on your face too. Such a shame.
I think what you need, Stinkyone, is to evolve beyond basic plumbing, and go out and get laid. In whatever manner suits you best. Obviously long overdue.
If you weren't there, you cannot possibly understand fully.

(April 2, 2010 at 12:19 pm)RedFish Wrote: Wow, musta really hurt when you fell, and to land on your face too. Such a shame.
I think what you need, Stinkyone, is to evolve beyond basic plumbing, and go out and get laid. In whatever manner suits you best. Obviously long overdue.
If you weren't there, you cannot possibly understand fully.

Wow. Thanks for being such an insightful psychiatrist.

Noted that you have avoided the argument at hand, with the minor exception of claiming that if one was not there, they cannot "understand".

I am curious, then, as to why I understand physics far better than many of the early pioneers, even though I was not present during their groundbreaking experiments.

I was not there when my brother and his wife conceived my niece.

According to Redfish, I guess I don't fully understand how that happened.

Well I don't want to start shouting about the need for firmer evidence cos of the risk of offending your brother and his wife..

You know the conception occured, and you can infer the physical technicalities that must have occurred, but the actual technicalities were only known by those present, surely? Or did you record the act?

(April 5, 2010 at 11:00 am)RedFish Wrote: Well I don't want to start shouting about the need for firmer evidence cos of the risk of offending your brother and his wife..

You know the conception occured, and you can infer the physical technicalities that must have occurred, but the actual technicalities were only known by those present, surely? Or did you record the act?

and even if it was recorded, he couldnt know, for example, what both...parties...thought at the time, or the reason for this conception.

Absolute evidence is impossible.

I eat food and magically poop comes out a few hours later. How can I know what's going on inside my body if I'm not witnessing it?

My best guess? God did it.

(April 3, 2010 at 8:23 am)Dotard Wrote: I was not there when my brother and his wife conceived my niece.

According to Redfish, I guess I don't fully understand how that happened.

Did the angel of lord come?

I'm more than 45% mushroom...

(April 6, 2010 at 5:50 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: I'm more than 45% mushroom...

Hush you. We're not talking about intelligent talking fungi.