Mickiel, if you truly do believe in evolution, then you are doing it for the wrong reasons because you clearly don't understand any of it.

(June 7, 2014 at 7:08 am)Bad Wolf Wrote: Mickiel, if you truly do believe in evolution, then you are doing it for the wrong reasons because you clearly don't understand any of it.

I don't believe a word that shows up under his username.

He clearly doesn't understand what evidence is, yet by his book this whole thread is 'evidence'. He clearly doesn't understand what evolution is, yet he says he 'believes' in it, but not quite the same way as everyone else. He says he's not religious, but seems to want to tell the world about what it is he believes, and the fact that he chooses an atheist forum to come and do this on, shows me without any doubt that he's a lying piece of shit, he clearly has an agenda is so blatantly religious it's unreal.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: I have no mythology,

This is a lie, based on what "mythology" means, which I told you.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: I am not confined by you're definitions.

If you're just going to redefine everything to suit your "arguments", you will fail at convincing anyone of anything... other than yourself.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: Religion is mans effort to search for and reach god,

So you're not searching for and trying to reach god? Do you believe in an afterlife? Do you follow what your god tells you to do to go to the "good" afterlife? If the answer to these questions is "yes", then, by definition, you're trying to reach god.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: which is the origin of science;

Wrong. Science evolved independently of "searching for and trying to reach god". See, people back then read the Bible and found the part about the Tower of Babel, where god pissed his pants at the very idea of humans trying to reach him, which caused him to throw a hissy fit and scramble everyone's brain, so science was largely repressed.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: I already know its the other way around; god has to reveal himself to the human first; or there can be no real connection with him directly.

I'm sure it works that way for humans too, only humans go to jail when they reveal themselves to other humans when said humans don't want to.
Seriously though, why doesn't god reveal himself to everyone? If people can't search for and reach god, but god still wants to be known and worshiped by everyone. Is your god an idiot? Or is your religion simply full of holes, as all religions are?

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: Well even that is no so, he can reveal things through his spirit to a human, and still not get personal with that human.

God has a "spirit", whatever that is? Weren't "spirits" created by god? What would be the purpose of that? Does your god want to go to "god Heaven" when he (by the way, why is your god a "he"?) dies? And how is revealing things not getting personal? Is there no interaction between god and the human?

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: I know and accept that I will not know god, until he decides its my time; he has not.

Yeah... Except "he" told you he's real. No knowledge transfer went on there.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: I am not religious, because I do not believe hardly anything religion does;

Other than:
Deities
Spirits
Mythology
Creationism

You know, which are the core principles of every major religion. You're just missing "objective morality", and your religion is the same as everyone else's.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: I view religion as differently ass I view evolution.

What you call evolution is nothing of the sort, which you know. Again, this is a lie.
Does your god like liars?

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: By the way, have you ever seen " The Nuzi Tablets", a great find in biblical archaeology.

And you also ascribe to the Bible? The only way you could be more religious is if you had followers.

(June 7, 2014 at 11:31 am)One Above All Wrote:

(June 7, 2014 at 11:18 am)mickiel Wrote: I have no mythology,

If you're just going to redefine everything to suit your "arguments", you will fail at convincing anyone of anything... other than yourself.

[.

I hold no interest in convincing anyone here of anything; atheist should think exactly as they do, they are supposed to. I think as I do, because it is my time to think in that manner. I do not believe in changing how others think; I like atheist just as they are.