(May 7, 2010 at 9:17 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: @leo-rcc
ME-262 ARE to little too late....Your point??

That is the point.

Zen Badger Wrote:True, but you can't blame the aircraft for that.

And it was Willy's best design.

I think that so late in the war Hitler would have been better off with more Volksjäger than ME 262's. Sure, the 262 was a better plane, but it took too many resources to build them.

1. Why?
2. Does infinity have a value?
3. What is dark energy?
4. What is ' anything ' non-material?
5. Is a Utopia on earth possible?
6. Are you a good person?
7. What is a good person?
8. Can you really answer all questions?

Zen Badger Wrote:Does Heisenbergs uncertainty principle mean that there is an ultimate limit to human knowledge?

No. We can only know as much as our brain has space for. That is our current limit.

As for wether our knowledge is an accurate portrayal of existence, however: the uncertainty principle applies, as does subjectivity. If this is what you meant by 'knowledge'... then the answer would be yes.

Quote:P.s like my new avatar?

Yuppers ^_^

---

Leo-rcc Wrote:ME 262's were too little too late.

To win the war for the Germans? Maybe.

They still kicked ass though

Kichiganeko Wrote:Nice!!

You got a facebook page baby girl??

Of course I haven't used it much until just this last week though... :S

---

ib.me.un Wrote:1. Why?

Specify.

Quote:2. Does infinity have a value?

Yes. An infinite one.

Quote:3. What is dark energy?

Energy that is dark.

Quote:4. What is ' anything ' non-material?

Nothing can exist without being by definition material. Therefore anything that is non-material is also nothing.

Quote:5. Is a Utopia on earth possible?

Indeed... the question becomes rather: do you really want to see it?

Quote:6. Are you a good person?

To answer indirectly (for reasons dictated in my answer to your 7th question of me)... I am as close to the paragon of humanity as it is possible to get without becoming dramatically unjust. In that sense... i suppose you could call me good beyond people.

Quote:7. What is a good person?

That depends on how you define "person". Further, it truly does depend on how you define "good". Semantics: important.

Quote:8. Can you really answer all questions?

I can indeed.

1: What's your mental age!? evil:
2: DO you have any "pets"?
3: How do you define "Insanity"?
4: Do you think i have any "pets"?

DSM Wrote:1: What's your mental age!?

2 SolIV Years.

Quote:2: DO you have any "pets"?

Yes.

Quote:3: How do you define "Insanity"?

A synonym would be 'Pineapple'. The full definition would be: 'me'.

Quote:4: Do you think i have any "pets"?

Probably even more than me

(May 7, 2010 at 9:33 am)leo-rcc Wrote: I think that so late in the war Hitler would have been better off with more Volksjäger than ME 262's. Sure, the 262 was a better plane, but it took too many resources to build them.

I would contend that more He162s would not have made a difference.

Aircraft production was in '44 at an all time high despite Allied bombing.

What Adolf needed was fuel and pilots.

A further point is that the 162 needed very experienced hands at the controls(which makes

a mockery of the plans to train hitler youths on gliders and stick 'em in the cockpits)

It would be easier to have trained pilots for the 262 and since it was much better armed

for the bomber destroyer mission it would have been a better return in investment.

What were the five best single seat fighters of WWII?

(May 8, 2010 at 7:23 am)Zen Badger Wrote: What were the five best single seat fighters of WWII?

mustang
spitfire
me 109
foker wolf
zero

^Dammit downbeatplumb! You answered *MY* question

1. Would Adrian agree with point 4?
2. Are you selfish?
3. What do you want to be?
4. Are you on drugs?
5. What would the World be like if Germany won the War?
6. What is the point of the thread?
7. Can you be serious?
8. How old are you?
9. If you answer a question with an opinion, is the answer correct?
10. Can you use a dictionary?