(October 30, 2014 at 12:18 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(October 30, 2014 at 12:05 pm)Losty Wrote: 3 Let the husband render to his wife the affection due her, and likewise also the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. 5 Do not deprive one another except with consent for a time

I wish people would stop quoting this verse. It makes me physically ill.

If people would quit claiming that the Bible says sex is only for procreation, we wouldn't need to quote it.

If people didn't use it as an excuse to rape their spouses, it wouldn't make me sick. But then, that's the reason most of the bible makes me sick. It is either explicit permission/order to do something horrible and unspeakable, or it is something that can easily be interpreted as such.

(October 30, 2014 at 12:24 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Congratulations. The Bible contradicts itself. There are multiple passages that admonish celibacy as the preferred option. The above passage endorses spousal rape. Bold emphasis mine.

It's even funnier than that, since some revered christian leaders like Origen of Alexandria took it upon themselves to cut of their privates for the sake of purity. And by the way, the bible has some interesting contradictions about that too:

"For there are (1) some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are (2) some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be (3) eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." -Matthew 19:12

And of course:

Deuteronomy 23:1: No one who has been emasculated by crushing or cutting may enter the assembly of the LORD.

(October 30, 2014 at 12:57 pm)Alice Wrote:

(October 30, 2014 at 3:19 am)Losty Wrote: How fitting is it that the beefcake is the only one I find even slightly remotely attractive. Even then it's like...meh I'm just not that in to cartoon dudes.

That seems like such a sad state; while I'm not particularly into most of those, I can at least see why another might find them attractive. I wonder why some people don't.

Okay. How about these?

---

---

---

(October 30, 2014 at 8:04 am)DramaQueen Wrote: I don't like the beefcake, too much muscle

You're right. I should have made a meatloaf out of it instead

---

(October 30, 2014 at 8:14 am)Losty Wrote: 1)no one ever said you had good taste.
2)where can you see any muscle? All I can see is a lot of gear.

You know how people cover up nips and vag, and somehow come away looking all the sexier (especially with the 'big reveal')? Same theory... imagine him taking that armor... off.

Not to suggest that the large frame in and of itself shouldn't sell Marcus Fenix

---

(October 30, 2014 at 8:20 am)DramaQueen Wrote: I love muscular hairy men but that character was over the top

It's a video game. Over the top is part of our legacy.

Second to the last one is alright.

(October 30, 2014 at 1:30 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: I did not ask you to rephrase your assertion. I asked you to explain your logic.

The logic is apparent. Images aren't drawn randomly. They're intended to have effects on real live people. As Alice noted, games could be played with characters made only of basic shapes.

Quote:Predictable.

Yes, it's predictable that you go to the meta argument when you lose the Biblical argument.

Instead of lists of steps, just give the verses that say sex is only for procreation...

(October 30, 2014 at 2:20 pm)alpha male Wrote: As Alice noted, games could be played with characters made only of basic shapes.

How boring that would be.

(October 30, 2014 at 2:00 pm)Losty Wrote: If people didn't use it as an excuse to rape their spouses, it wouldn't make me sick. But then, that's the reason most of the bible makes me sick. It is either explicit permission/order to do something horrible and unspeakable, or it is something that can easily be interpreted as such.

A Christian who treats his wife as the Bible instructs will never have need to force himself on her. She'll be happy to oblige. My wife was waiting for me in black lingerie and heels when I got home yesterday. The kids were at church youth group. Heh heh.

*shudders*

(October 30, 2014 at 2:23 pm)abaris Wrote: How boring that would be.

Yep. That's why they dress it up - the images have an effect on the viewers.

---

(October 30, 2014 at 2:33 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: *shudders*

So did we...in a good way!

(October 30, 2014 at 2:33 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(October 30, 2014 at 2:23 pm)abaris Wrote: How boring that would be.

Yep. That's why they dress it up - the images have an effect on the viewers.

---

And that's as it should be, since games have the purpose of escapism.

By the way, I always think it's funny there's so much outrage about the possibilities of human privates in games, since seeing something like that might seriously hurt the tender souls of our little ones. But when it comes to violence, games have to be really gory to get the +18 label. Normal violence is obviously perfectly OK.

(October 30, 2014 at 2:32 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(October 30, 2014 at 2:00 pm)Losty Wrote: If people didn't use it as an excuse to rape their spouses, it wouldn't make me sick. But then, that's the reason most of the bible makes me sick. It is either explicit permission/order to do something horrible and unspeakable, or it is something that can easily be interpreted as such.

A Christian who treats his wife as the Bible instructs will never have need to force himself on her. She'll be happy to oblige. My wife was waiting for me in black lingerie and heels when I got home yesterday. The kids were at church youth group. Heh heh.

Absolutely no one ever needs to rape anyone ever regardless of how they interpret the bible
I'm so happy for you that your wife enjoys sex with you. I'm so happy for her that you enjoy sex the way she enjoys it.

Read the verse jackass. Not that the true sickos don't just stop reading before that anyways. The only consent required in the verse is for time. So once you have free time your spouse is biblically permitted to smash your face into the headboard and violently rape you while blood pours down your face onto the sheets. Because your body doesn't belong to you and god doesn't give a shit if you like sex like that. It's disgusting. Why do you make this assumption that all Christians are good people? You can easily adhere to that verse and justifiably rape your spouse just because you want to.

Let's say a woman is waiting in heels and lingerie for her husband, because like a good little wife she wants to please him. Let's say when he sees her he lifts her up by her throat and slams her into the wall, rips off her lingerie, and takes her violently all the while she is is begging him not to hurt her. Let's say she's not into that stuff and her pleas are genuine. Her husband hasn't broken any rules according to that verse.