(December 8, 2014 at 3:13 pm)abaris Wrote:

(December 8, 2014 at 2:59 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: In order to be considered scientific, they would have had to been tested. Feel free to post any test concerning NDE's.

I just pointed you to the links in the IF thread. The tests have been already posted. You just have to look - over there, if it isn't too much of an effort.

Or you can just link it, don't really feel like searching for something that's non existent.

(December 8, 2014 at 3:17 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(December 8, 2014 at 3:08 pm)Beccs Wrote: http://www.scientificamerican.com/articl...ear-death/

Making us disprove your claims is like asking you to disprove the claims of UFO "abductees".

Burden of proof isn't on us.

And where does your article reference any tests that have been done?

Nothing like moving the goalposts and ignoring burden of proof.

You have testimonials.

Now YOU provide the scientific tests of the claims you make.

"I have no scientific proof but I'm making a claim anyway. Show me scientific proof that I'm wrong."

I trust even you can see the lopsided nature of that statement Huggies.

(December 8, 2014 at 3:20 pm)Beccs Wrote:

(December 8, 2014 at 3:17 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: And where does your article reference any tests that have been done?

Nothing like moving the goalposts and ignoring burden of proof.

You have testimonials.

Now YOU provide the scientific tests of the claims you make.

1. Show where I moved the goal posts.

2. Show where I claimed my data was scientific.

I said it was eye witness testimony, which is accepted as "evidence' in a courtroom btw.

(December 8, 2014 at 3:24 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(December 8, 2014 at 3:20 pm)Beccs Wrote: Nothing like moving the goalposts and ignoring burden of proof.

You have testimonials.

Now YOU provide the scientific tests of the claims you make.

1. Show where I moved the goal posts.

2. Show where I claimed my data was scientific.

I said it was eye witness testimony, which is accepted as "evidence' in a courtroom btw.

So, then you accept the claims of UFO abductees?

(December 8, 2014 at 3:27 pm)Beccs Wrote:

(December 8, 2014 at 3:24 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: 1. Show where I moved the goal posts.

2. Show where I claimed my data was scientific.

I said it was eye witness testimony, which is accepted as "evidence' in a courtroom btw.

So, then you accept the claims of UFO abductees?

This would suggest UFO's exist, unless you have a "scientific" explanation.

Courtrooms don't make assertions about reality, Huggy. You are.

(December 8, 2014 at 3:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(December 8, 2014 at 3:27 pm)Beccs Wrote: So, then you accept the claims of UFO abductees?

This would suggest UFO's exist, unless you have a "scientific" explanation.

Gotcha.

Lack of scepticism.

(December 8, 2014 at 3:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(December 8, 2014 at 3:27 pm)Beccs Wrote: So, then you accept the claims of UFO abductees?

This would suggest UFO's exist, unless you have a "scientific" explanation.

And this suggests that leprechauns exist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nda_OSWeyn8

How far down the bullshit hole do you have to go before you realize that claiming to see something does not make that something exist.

Wowzer.

Might wanna Google "argument from ignorance." I've only explained what it is in about 7 threads today, but who's counting.