Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:00 am
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2014 at 9:01 am by Alex K.)
(December 10, 2014 at 8:54 am)Nope Wrote: Sometimes I suspect that apologists do not care about the truth of their claim but just want to win the argument.
Yes. Their arguments are more a show of piety than a search for rigorous proof - look at me, how blatantly I am willing to equivocate for Jesus.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:06 am
(December 10, 2014 at 8:54 am)Nope Wrote: Sometimes I suspect that apologists do not care about the truth of their claim but just want to win the argument.
Exhibit A
[youtube]I4DJritFkzM[/youtube]
This is also what places the OP squarely in the Poe category, even with the tells.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:08 am
Sye Ten B., he must be one of the most annoying people in the business. Few people make me want so smash something like that guy.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:10 am
(December 10, 2014 at 5:57 am)Alex K Wrote: (December 10, 2014 at 5:24 am)Exian Wrote: This is inspiring. You need a suit, a green screen, and a youtube channel. Get on it, True Christian ™!
Seconded!
Might want to check out YouTube, actually. There's a guy going around claiming to be YitW's alter ego.
Also, I vote this thread needs turning into a sticky.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:12 am
Does anyone really think that by "winning" (going on until everyone else goes home) they have somehow achieved something?
The whole point of debate is to make people think, and ultimately, to maybe move closer to your point of view. If absolutely no one buys a word you say, you're just convincing yourself more of utter crap. What a waste of time.
It's sad how virtually every single apologetic tactic is deceitful. Real arguments don't need this sleight of hand crap. And hey look! Spin you wheels all you want, still no God.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:13 am
(December 10, 2014 at 9:08 am)Alex K Wrote: Sye Ten B., he must be one of the most annoying people in the business. Few people make me want so smash something like that guy.
My first encounter with that git was on the old Connecticut Valley Atheist forums (or was it EvilBible?). I still feel soiled.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:14 am
Hey, I can play games with words like know and truth! Therefor God.
However much he gets paid, it's too much. He's such a tool.
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 9:22 am
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2014 at 9:28 am by Exian.)
(December 10, 2014 at 9:10 am)Stimbo Wrote: (December 10, 2014 at 5:57 am)Alex K Wrote: Seconded!
Might want to check out YouTube, actually. There's a guy going around claiming to be YitW's alter ego.
Also, I vote this thread needs turning into a sticky.
Are you saying he already has a channel!?! Give the man a plug! I'll subscribe.
Also I 2nd the sticky.
Posts: 639
Threads: 47
Joined: March 7, 2012
Reputation:
34
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 6:17 pm
(December 10, 2014 at 9:22 am)Exian Wrote: (December 10, 2014 at 9:10 am)Stimbo Wrote: Might want to check out YouTube, actually. There's a guy going around claiming to be YitW's alter ego.
Also, I vote this thread needs turning into a sticky.
Are you saying he already has a channel!?! Give the man a plug! I'll subscribe.
Also I 2nd the sticky.
No, no, you mustn't go to that hellbound heathen's channel! He commits the most profane blasphemy by reading the Bible and applying all that logic and reason in his analysis of sacred scripture.
Here's an example of a video you should definitely not watch, where he presumes to cross-examine the "historical documents" we know as the Gospel accounts of the life of our Lord. It's posted so you know where not to go on YouTube:
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church
™: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians ™ because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to.
And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley: 
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 10, 2014 at 6:56 pm
I don't know who that fucker is, but I subscribed the shit out of it, you know,...ironically.
He knows. He knows.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
|
