Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 19, 2024, 6:25 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
That is a possibility, I admit. But I find it more likely that this was a popular personality cult, possibly one of the unnamed ones in the histories I read. Obviously the mythic aspects of Jesus are just that. But a simple revolutionary preacher? This seems plausible. And recall that the gospels were propaganda pieces, never meant to be honest attempts at history.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
When people report being abducted by aliens, does that mean that there are aliens?

Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
No, of course not. But it's easier to hallucinate or dream something you're already familiar with than one you just make up.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 15, 2014 at 1:49 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: When people report being abducted by aliens, does that mean that there are aliens?

Well of course.

It's our alien overlords coming back to check on their creation. Didn't you know?

And I hope you appreciate the fact that I messed up my hair deliberately just to type that.

[Image: i-dont-care-what-you-say-ancient-fucking-aliens.jpg]

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
There were, I believe, four Jesuses known to history from around that time, all of them doomsday prophets in their own way and none of them fitting the bill for the godboy even if you strip away the magic. Add to which the name Jesus (Yeshu, Yeshua, whatever) was practically as common a name then as, say, Dave is now, and you could postulate a thousand rebel cult leaders called Jesus, the existence of whom is lost to history.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 15, 2014 at 1:58 pm)Stimbo Wrote: There were, I believe, four Jesuses known to history from around that time, all of them doomsday prophets in their own way and none of them fitting the bill for the godboy even if you strip away the magic. Add to which the name Jesus (Yeshu, Yeshua, whatever) was practically as common a name then as, say, Dave is now, and you could postulate a thousand rebel cult leaders called Jesus, the existence of whom is lost to history.

Dave of Nazereth, Someone must make this sit com.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 15, 2014 at 2:06 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(December 15, 2014 at 1:58 pm)Stimbo Wrote: There were, I believe, four Jesuses known to history from around that time, all of them doomsday prophets in their own way and none of them fitting the bill for the godboy even if you strip away the magic. Add to which the name Jesus (Yeshu, Yeshua, whatever) was practically as common a name then as, say, Dave is now, and you could postulate a thousand rebel cult leaders called Jesus, the existence of whom is lost to history.

Dave of Nazereth, Someone must make this sit com.

Someone must make this their user title.

Oh, wait.

Angel
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 15, 2014 at 1:54 am)His_Majesty Wrote:
(December 14, 2014 at 6:00 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: But the thing is, Shakespeare, I didn't make that claim.

You said in post #75 "He (God) actually doesn't do anything at all, because he is a figment of your imagination."

That is a claim of knowledge...and I simply asked you to provide evidence for that absolute claim...which you didn't, which you can't.

No, it's an opinion.

(December 15, 2014 at 1:54 am)His_Majesty Wrote:
(December 14, 2014 at 6:00 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I voiced my opinion that your god is a figment of your imagination.

You conveniently left out the first part where you said made the absolute claim...I just posted it in context above...and the # post you said it in...so keep it real...have some integrity about yourself.

... said the guy who made a positive claim about having settled the matter of Jesus's existence ... only to backtrack and say that it was his opinion.

You're so stupid you don't even realize you got fished into this position deliberately. Thank you for agreeing with my point.

Oh -- and I believe your god is a figment of your imagination.

[Image: 2qi92xg.jpg]

Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 15, 2014 at 1:49 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: When people report being abducted by aliens, does that mean that there are aliens?
I think what really reinforces it is when people who knew people who claimed to know those people write about the abductions. Forty or so years later.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Two threads merged?

Does that mean I can start a thread on the case for the resurrection of Gandalf the Grey?

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 52 4148 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 6387 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 9376 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 4066 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 4286 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1702 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 4129 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 3429 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20895 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2487 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)